dgerard

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] dgerard@awful.systems 3 points 14 hours ago

that gives me questions about China

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 2 points 14 hours ago

that's tomorrow's Pivot

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 4 points 14 hours ago

Chris Kluwe vs Gamergate is an example of the jocks as the good guys up against the nerds as the bad guys

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 9 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

IQ is a farce multiplier. Elon is a High IQ Individual which means he wreaks 1000x the havoc of a regular dumbass. IQ stands for Idiot Quickly

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 3 points 15 hours ago

BBC summary of the story of Ziz

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 11 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

the user has been gently directed to the debate club

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 4 points 1 day ago (4 children)

the Laserjet 4M from the 1990s, the incredible unstoppable tank of lasers

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Superbabies is a backup plan; focus the energy of humanity’s collective genetic endowment into a single generation, and have THAT generation to solve problems like “figure out how to control digital superintelligence

The academic institutions in charge of exploring these ideas are deeply compromised by insane ideologies. And the big commercial entities are too timid to do anything truly novel; once they discovered they had a technology that could potentially make a few tens of billions treating single gene genetic disorders, no one wanted to take any risks; better to take the easy, guaranteed money and spend your life on a lucrative endeavor improving the lives of 0.5% of the population than go for a hail mary project that will result in journalists writing lots of articles calling you a eugenicist.

oh no, not a eugenicist!

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 6 points 2 days ago

apparently video is just huuuuge

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

this is also why pivot to AI is mostly 200-250 words, not 1200 or 2000 or 8000

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

per link, venture capital has been very reluctant to unambiguously realise the losses. a $1b book value is an (imaginary) asset you can hug and hold, a $114m loss is not.

 

the old one is three weeks old, let's start another

previous thread

view more: next ›