this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
476 points (96.1% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2817 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vegeta@lemmy.world 238 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (8 children)

He's Schrödinger's Brandon: Too strong and too weak at the same time. I wonder if there is an ideology that typically uses this tactic to define an opponent?

[–] Veraxus@lemmy.world 150 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Fascism trait #8:

Thus, by a continuous shifting of rhetorical focus, the enemies are at the same time too strong and too weak.
Ur-Fascism by Umberto Eco

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago

This whole piece is excellent, thanks for sharing

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 94 points 8 months ago (1 children)

He's Schrödinger's Brandon: Too strong and too weak at the same time. I wonder if there is an ideology that typically uses this tactic to define an opponent?

There is, and the answer is as clear as the nose on your fascist.

Face! I meant face. Stupid autocorrect.

[–] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 months ago

Oh sure, it's clear to most, but today's conservative minds need to carefully do some warm up stretches before they can absorb this truth, or they'll tyranny ligament.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's gotta be democracy because the Republicans are adamant they are defending it right?

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

I'm pretty sure the republicans recently explicitly said they don't like democracy

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Same as it ever was. The Nazis did the same thing with the groups they scapegoated, simultaneously an incompetent drain/liability and and a hyper-competent threat that cannot be ignored.

Critical thinking and reasoning must be taught, without that, people will follow their feelings anywhere, and those are easy to manipulate.

Starving public education into complete and utter ruins for half a century to cut rich sociopath's taxes, and the rise of tens of millions of proudly counterfactual, willfully ignorant nitwits as a political force is not a coincidence.

Garbage in (refusing to pay to educate kids to critically scrutinize the information they take in), garbage out (The United States of duhhhhhhhhhhh).

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

Hell, Republicans have been doing this for decades. Remember all the lazy handout-demanding Mexicans who are stealing all our jobs?

[–] Maeve@kbin.social 11 points 8 months ago

The saddest part for them is, I've read about studies that say a better-educated populace is a more compassionate populace. Guess who will care for them when they are too old to care for themselves?

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

The followers must feel humiliated by the ostentatious wealth and force of their enemies. When I was a boy I was taught to think of Englishmen as the five-meal people. They ate more frequently than the poor but sober Italians. Jews are rich and help each other through a secret web of mutual assistance. However, the followers must be convinced that they can overwhelm the enemies. Thus, by a continuous shifting of rhetorical focus, the enemies are at the same time too strong and too weak. Fascist governments are condemned to lose wars because they are constitutionally incapable of objectively evaluating the force of the enemy.

Edit: I guess I can’t bold in a quoted passage, so here it is: Thus, by a continuous shifting of rhetorical focus, the enemies are at the same time too strong and too weak.

Umberto Eco

Ur Fascism

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

But my favorite piece is at the end. I remind everyone all the time and nauseum that facists are stupid:

Fascist governments are condemned to lose wars because they are constitutionally incapable of objectively evaluating the force of the enemy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] solarvector@lemmy.zip 144 points 8 months ago (8 children)

The comments from the article were surprisingly not bad. One made a good point:

The POTUS started his SotU speech with:

“Now it is we who face an unprecedented moment in the history of the Union. And yes, my purpose tonight is to both wake up this Congress, and alert the American people that this is no ordinary moment either. Not since President Lincoln and the Civil War have freedom and democracy been under assault here at home as they are today.”

I have watched a lot of state of the union addresses and I cannot remember one that began with this stark of warning.

Yet, all the articles being posted are about MTG and whether Biden looked/didn’t look old and who clapped and who didn’t.

That’s a 5-alarm fire bell he just rang, broadcasted out to the entire country and world, pay attention to what’s important

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 34 points 8 months ago

The majority of the USA is behind Ukraine, it's the magats that are being dumb russian puppets.

[–] xenoclast@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

Yes. Every other thing is rage bait to distract you.

I worry that at this point if people haven't figured that out they're never going to

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] voracitude@lemmy.world 122 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

He's too low-energy, he's old! He's too high-energy, he's... uh... Whatever! Vote for the guy who wants to do away with voting!

These guys, I swear 🙄

[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 108 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The forklift moving the goalposts just broke the sound barrier.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago (6 children)

Which is wild because forklifts really can't go much faster than a brisk jogging pace. Not unless you strap a rocket to it. Coincidentally Rocket Propelled Forklift is my new band name

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

The qons have installed wheels on the goalposts long ago.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 92 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ah, those times when reality reads like an onion article.

Fox News was ready to criticize Biden about his energy levels - they realized sleepy Joe wouldn't land so they had to pivot. This is honestly feeling like 1984 satire, I expect to see footage from rallies were Trump supporters are quoted as saying "Biden is so angry and sporadic, I'm voting for Trump because he's much more calm and composed" and the one guy that didn't get the memo that they've always been at war with East Asia will hold up a "Sleepy Joe" sign before being shunned and photoshopped out of the rally.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

I laughed because I thought it was an Onion article at first glance. Holy shit.

[–] orphiebaby@lemm.ee 63 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 8 months ago

"Too woke! More sleepy please"

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 58 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Republicans will complain about literally anything to make anyone who opposes them look worse.

We should only listen to Republicans in order to decipher (it ain't hard, they aren't subtle) what new atrocities they are going to be attempting next.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not complain, they will attack literally anything.

And if they ever run out of things to attack, they will create things to attack. Remember that recession that was going to happen?

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Migrant caravan and bears oh my!

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 56 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The “he was too partisan” comments annoyed the shit out of me. Republicans are nothing if not hypocritical snowflakes.

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 33 points 8 months ago

That's why i stopped giving their words any weight. They'll complain no matter what, so fuck em

[–] Nobody@lemmy.world 36 points 8 months ago
[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 29 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

"JOE BIDEN IS TOO (insert current thing Joe has done well)"

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 27 points 8 months ago (1 children)

"Intelligible!"

"Knowledgeable!"

"Sane!"

"Capable of completing a thought!"

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

He doesn't piss his stinky diaper as good as trump tho!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NevermindNoMind@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Republican media has convinced their viewers that Biden is basically constantly confused and just slackjawed and drooling constantly. They set expectations for him so low, when reality didn't bare out their caracicture they had to pivot. I think the implication they are going for is Biden was dosed with something to make him seem coherent, basically the weekend at Bernie's president. Dumb, but so are Fox News viewers, so I'm sure it'll go over just fine with them.

That said, it did seem like Biden was yelling a lot. The few moments where he slowed down to talk about some somber topic came as a relief to me. To put a metric to it, I saw in Politico that the written version of his speech contained 80 more explanation marks than last year's speech.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

Their viewers aren't watching the raw state of the address. They're watching the sound bites, so the conservative media can sell it whatever way they want

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Gotta love these idiots' logic.

GOP: "SLEEPY JOE!!!"

Dems inject him with Adderall or whatever juice to get him going.

GOP: "HE'S TOO POWERFUL!!!"

Biden: "muahahaha!"

[–] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

honestly I hope he did take stimulants- by all accounts a river of lab grade amphetimines and benzodiazepines flowed through the trump whitehouse. gotta level the playing field

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tolstoshev@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Fucking Goldilocks over here.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago
[–] EvilLootbox@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

It's wrong for someone to talk quickly trying to destroy people with facts and logic! No President should be allowed allowed to angrily yell at a crowd in a long speech! I need to watch Ben Shapiro and Trump for hours now because I'm so angry about these things Biden did!

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I finally just watched it, and especially paid attention to verbal missteps that people are talking about ……

….. I saw lots and took way too long to realize YouTube search had given me the 2022 state of the union. Oops

….. back on track with the current one, and the President was on fire. So much livelier and more expressive than two years ago! Definitely kicked ass and laid to rest the idea that he is too old

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Why are people still even talking about his verbal missteps? I ignore anyone who rags on his stutter. He's got a legitimate medical condition, and he works hard in his speech therapy to talk as well as he does. It has nothing to do with his mental ability, as there are young people with the same issue.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›