So the state supreme court ruled that a fertilized human egg is a human life and killing it is murder. Now the legislature is, in essence, saying murder of those innocent, unborn humans in this circumstance is okay. They care about innocent human life, but not when it might cost them votes, I guess.
this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
112 points (100.0% liked)
politics
19072 readers
3738 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
So what's to stop their supreme court from striking that down?
Since self defense is a valid defense for a murder charge, murder itself is not against the constitution. In theory, the state legislature could pass legislation making "they looked at me funny" a valid defense for murder too if they wanted, so saying IVF makes murder okay should fly. I guess the state supreme court could say that this legislation runs afoul of the equal protection clause of the US Constitution since it only applies to some people, but who knows. Considering that these judges just make shit up these days they could strike it down because they passed it on a Wednesday.
In a speech that included quotes from the Bible, the TV show Reacher, and the lyrics of 90's rapper Vanilla Ice, Republican state Rep. Ernie Yarbrough introduced an amendment to the bill to add that "immunity will not be provided to a person who intentionally causes the death of an unborn child."
LMFAO Please tell me he used "ice ice baby" in a speech about frozen embryos 🤣
So essentially they didn't address one of the biggest issues, what to do with the remaining embryos. Seems pretty on brand for conservative legislation.
From what I gathered the legislation was simple enough with just being two paragraphs long (imagine a world where there's not 50 pages of bullshit and 2 ear marks to vote on) that it reads that they're able to do whatever they want without getting in trouble for it. Keep em or toss em.
Thanks for the clarification. I read it quickly earlier and missed the part where the amendment was voted down.
I don't know which part of that list of sources is the saddest
The "other" Holy Trinity.
"Life begins at conception" but embryos outside a woman's body have no personhood rights, while embryos within a woman's body (even those outside her uterus, in the case of ectopic pregnancy) have personhood rights that exceed those of the woman. It's not about the embryos, it's about controlling women's bodies.
And it's really a viability argument, because if you do nothing, the IVF ones will eventually thaw out and die, and the ones in utero will live. Yet they're unwilling to follow that argument to its logical extension of a 24-week leeway for abortion.
“I never thought leopards would eat my face,” said the legislators from the face-eating leopards party.
So what are the odds that these voters will vote out the people that caused this mess in November? This is a rhetorical statement, as this is Alabama. The state that almost voted for a child molester over a Democrat.
They might as well pass a law that says deaths in the meat packing industry aren't actually criminal 🤷
Shhhhh! They'll hear you!