this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
999 points (97.5% liked)

News

23320 readers
3314 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Bill Gates wants ultra-wealthy individuals to pay more tax — and now a growing chorus of billionaires agree.

In his annual "Ask Me Anything" forum on Reddit last year, the Microsoft cofounder said he was "surprised" that taxes for the rich haven't been increased more.

Gates doubled down on his calls to tax the rich in a panel at the World Economic Forum in Davos this week. He said the wealthiest nations should donate more money to developing countries to help redress inequality.

"Those who have the most — whether it's countries, companies, or individuals — should be pushed to be more generous," he said.

It seems others agree, as more than 250 ultra-wealthy people signed an open letter calling for global leaders to impose a wealth tax.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ono@lemmy.ca 183 points 10 months ago (3 children)

How about backing up that letter with some lobbyists?

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 86 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Ads. We need these folks taking out issues ads, raising the profile of taxing the ultra-rich.

Hi, I'm Bill Gates, and I am spending more on this ad campaign than I paid in taxes.

Paid for by Bill Gates

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (5 children)

As long as it is only a letter other billionaires don't care. They know it's lip service.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 31 points 10 months ago

Yep, who cares what these billionaires say.

Other billionaires are spending tens or hundreds of millions on lobbyists to prevent tax.

If they want it to change, they need to pay some lobbyists too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 67 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (7 children)

People are right to point out that he should not simply cut a check to the government, instead he should lobby for higher wealth taxes like he lobbies for patents or voucher schools. Anything less is just free PR.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 59 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Says the guy that fought tooth and nail for MRNA vaccination patents to remain private. Yeah pay taxes but maybe don't make the money to begin with.

actions > words

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] gencha@lemm.ee 51 points 10 months ago (8 children)

Says the guy who funnels his entire wealth through a foundation to avoid paying any taxes. Just like he told Epstein to do. Love you Bill

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago (5 children)

But you see, he deserves it for stealing all that work and ideas from other people

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 45 points 10 months ago (10 children)

Dear Bill,

Would you be up for taxing charities owned by billionaires?

Sincerely yours

[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Charities are such an obvious money laundering scheme. "Philanthropy" my ass, it's always tax evasion, all of this is just for the gallery.

Source: https://ips-dc.org/report-true-cost-of-billionaire-philanthropy/?mc_cid=bfa8894a28

[–] LostWon@lemmy.ca 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Billionaire philanthropy is also frequently a PR thing-- image rehabilitation.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] daniyeg@lemmy.ml 42 points 10 months ago (1 children)

"i know you guys are upset at us fucking over all of you, but i assure you if you let us continue being petty tyrants with vast fortunes, we might give a marginally bigger sum of it back to the government, which will still spend it on whatever we tell it to anyway. win win!"

i don't want you to be more generous, i want you to be gone. if anyone proposed a plan that would actually affect them i doubt they would still support a wealth tax.

[–] cgarret3@lemm.ee 9 points 10 months ago

“Generous” is the noteworthy takeaway. Either ‘currency’ belongs to society and some people hoard it instead of circulating it, or ‘the world’ ‘belongs’ to a very select few people.

[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 40 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Imagine if a wealthy individual, who believes that the wealthy should be taxed more, actually used their wealth to take out TV commercials in all states/provinces advocating for the increase in taxes for the wealthy, actually trying to sway the political mindset in a big way with the power they have via their wealth.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Easier to just release a statement. That way you can be the "good guy billionaire" without actually having to pay up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] anarchy79@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't believe shit they say, if they say "go ahead and tax me" it's because they've got a way out so they won't have to, somehow.

[–] Boop2133@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That "somehow" is called using credit to buy everything then setting your stocks as collateral, and since debt can't be taxed well...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rusticus@lemm.ee 35 points 10 months ago (4 children)

TL/DR; The super wealthy own the politicians so much they can tell them to do something that they will never do. Democracy is a fool's word.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 34 points 10 months ago (1 children)

After he has already used a "charity" he created to tax shelter most of his money...

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 20 points 10 months ago

He has more money now than when he started giving “virtually all” of it away to (his) charity. This doesn’t stop rubes from using his fauxlanthropy as some kind of proof that not all billionaires are evil.

[–] muelltonne@feddit.de 29 points 10 months ago

Dear Bill,

the german government has a banking account where you can send them money, no questions asked. Feel free to send over your fair share of taxes you are avoiding by routing the Microsoft profits from Germany via Luxembourg and other tax havens.

[–] Daxtron2@startrek.website 28 points 10 months ago (6 children)

They can flap their lips all they want, I won't believe them til they lobby for it and it gets changed.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It'd be really cool if Gates and other not-so-evil megarich would just openly give a bag of money to every congressman to vote for more taxes to multimillionaires :)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 21 points 10 months ago

Too late, compost these fuckers.

[–] Twelve20two@slrpnk.net 20 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Put up or shut up, Bill. And don't get me started on all the land you own

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

Oh, thank goodness the billionaires will save us from [checks notes] the billionaires.

[–] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago (2 children)

But not him, he doesn’t have a lot of money. He donated all of it to charity which he is the founding member of and has an exclusive rights on using resources they have. Thus some money gets used yearly for charity, but significantly less than if it was taxed, the rest is kept for when he needs it. The most common way for rich to avoid taxation. So now every time you see some rich dude donating almost all of their wealth to charity… they are creating a banking institution without tax.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kool_newt@lemm.ee 18 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Pretty sure I've seen this exact story about every 5 years for the last 20 years. It looks to me at this point like wealth apologism.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 16 points 10 months ago

My nine year old: “My nails are sharp and they get stuck to my clothes”
Me: “You should cut them. Do you need any help?”
9 y.o.: “Please cut them even if I start crying”

Sometimes people need their nails cut for them and you should be happy to oblige even if they start crying. Though I think Bill’s waning moment bribes are more convincing than offering to do chores.

[–] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Okay then like do it, if you want to pay more money to the government then just fucking give it to them instead of fucking around with this dumb letter saying, "oh we promise we care about the peasan.... I mean poors.... I mean the financially disadvantaged"

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I can't actually picture how easily someone would just send a larger check to the IRS - it'd probably be kicked back to you as a tax refund if you filled your taxes correctly.

Much easier would be to found your own charity to get similar effects done - which, surprise, Gates already does. And I'm sure he doesn't just mean "I should be paying more taxes", he means "Everyone as wealthy as me", even if said other people don't agree with him.

[–] ninja@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

If billionaires really wanted higher taxes, they'd have higher taxes.

What they want is no taxes and to look like their hands are tied "I can't possibly pay taxes they won't take my money! It's not my fault it's the government. Damn them!"

While they spend millions of dollars a year lobbying to get their taxes reduced even further and passed on to the working class.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TIMMAY@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Bill Gates should either shut his stupid fucking mouth or put his insanely exorbitant amount of money where that stupid fucking mouth is. Oh, he is a philanthropist and supports many causes and charities? No, he is an ultra wealthy individual who hordes his insane amount of wealth and has so much of it that he can casually drop seven plus figures in to any cause he wants, collect accolades from the public for it, and make that money back by the end of the fucking hour. Fuck bill gates

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] AnneBonny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 10 months ago (9 children)

No one is stopping you from giving money to the government.

You can make a gift to reduce public debt here: https://www.pay.gov/public/form/start/23779454

You can donate to the U.S. Government here: https://www.pay.gov/public/form/start/708094624

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] JoBo@feddit.uk 12 points 10 months ago

"should be pushed to be more generous"

Generosity my arse. Should be forced to pay their way. The rest of us cannot afford them.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

For every one of him, there are probably thousands of neuvo riche and wannabe rich who say otherwise. It's an unfortunate truth.

[–] novibe@lemmy.ml 11 points 10 months ago

They always say shit like this then put all their money in charities or shell corporations overseas… this is just marketing. He could easily pay more taxes right now if he wanted to.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

So does this mean a wealth tax that will actually hit the rich or simply increasing income taxes that will be avoided by the rich as usual?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] herrwoland@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

The fox thinks that we need a stronger hen security doors installed and the weasels agree 👏

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 10 points 10 months ago

"if only someone would close the loop holes, but alack, they remain and the accountants force me to use them, what ever is to become of poor rich Bill"

[–] AnAngryAlpaca@feddit.de 9 points 10 months ago (4 children)

What would stop them from just funding housing, healthcare or education by themselves, if they want to contribute to society?

[–] Tubics@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

It's still a massive difference to taxes. Society should decide where the money goes, not the wealthy individuals themselves

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

You can voluntarily overpay taxes. Put your money where your mouth is Bill.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›