this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2024

194 points (86.7% liked)

Political Memes

5413 readers

2770 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civil

Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformation

Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memes

Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotion

Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

HLMenckenFan@lemmy.world

Rooki@lemmy.world

automodbeta@lemmy.world

Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world

rjc@lemmy.world

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

JonsJava@lemmy.world

WrenFeathers@lemmy.world

194

Untitled Goose Game (lemmy.world)

submitted 9 months ago by TokenBoomer@lemmy.world to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 19 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Gigan@lemmy.world 17 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Maybe because child labor existed before capitalism and it exists in non-capitalist countries?

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

capitalism came with machines that mangles children, chemical exposures etc. Things they can't possibly know the consequences of.

Realistically like a kid making a basket or watching sheep is not the same danger level as being pulled into a machine or getting silicosis before they turn 18

[+] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world -12 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Then why didn’t capitalism fix that? Why?

[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

For a self-proclaimed "boomer", you're a surprisingly dense and uninformed, troll.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world -4 points 9 months ago

Every once in a while the universe surprises you.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Then why didn’t capitalism fix that? Why?

I mean, it did fix part of it:

Britain passed the Children and Young Persons Act in 1933 source

USA passed the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1938 source

We don't have adolescence coal miners today in the USA as a result:

Certainly not perfect, and even these standards are under attack today in the USA to make them worse.

If you're extending this child labor in other countries then you're opening a whole can of geopolitical problems with notes of imperialism and enforcing one culture's values on another.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 21 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Sorry, but things done by governments under the pressure of organised labour—even if those governments happened to be predominantly capitalist—do not qualify as "capitalism fixing that".

[–] Ashyr@sh.itjust.works 15 points 9 months ago

Socialist democracy fixed it, not capitalism.

[–] testfactor@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I feel like the issue with what you're saying is that it's a bit of a "no true Scotsman," right?

Like, if any time someone points out where a capitalistic group or society did something good, you respond, "well that's not capitalism," then you're just creating a tautological framework.

"All things I don't like are capitalism, and it doesn't matter if those same things happen in non-capitalist systems because in those cases that's actually just capitalism infecting an otherwise good non-capitalist system" is a fairly unexamined stance, right? It might as well be, "capitalism is any bad thing in the world." The word loses meaning at some point.

[–] Rolder@reddthat.com 9 points 9 months ago

I feel like, in this case, big business would LOVE to hire children if they were allowed to. So laws prevent this in spite of those desires.

[–] usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca 7 points 9 months ago

Things that happen under capitalism aren't necessarily because of capitalism (or any of the other "isms") so it is important to try and determine if these things that happen are a result of the system or despite it (or from some other overlapping system).

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

No, this isn't really a, "no true Scotsman," situation. The person claimed that Capitalism did reform child labor, but they gave examples of regulation, not Capitalism. An example of Capitalism ending child labor would be something like the free-market ending child labor because it was less profitable, but I can't think of a large-scale example of that.

If they had said, "No capitalist country could end Capitalism," and then when someone brought up the Fair Labor Act and they said, "Well then America isn't a really a Capitalist country," that would be a, "No true Scotsman," situation.

[–] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yesterday a 16 year old died in a poultry processing plant accident.

solved what now ? what are you on about solving when a 16 year old dies for your McNuggets ?

No one brought up other countries or other economic systems but you. That was changing the subject because why ?

Tu quo que what now ?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 9 months ago

Those were passed despite Capitalism, not because of it. Workers fought tooth and nail for every right they have.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Laws fixed that. Not capitalism.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

"Capitalism did fix it!"

Proceeds to list Socialist reforms passed in spite of Capitalist opposition.

[–] mortalglowworm@reddthat.com 5 points 9 months ago

If anyone is looking for, and if I am not mistaken, the above quote is from Parenti's Blackshirts and Reds.