this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18909 readers
3464 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has endorsed President Joe Biden’s reelection campaign, a sign of the president’s strength in uniting his party to have the backing of one of its most liberal members

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] onionbaggage@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Old man who vaguely agrees with my politics and is just mildly disappointing or a literal shit filled dumpster fire? Hmmm tough choice.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How is Biden disappointing? Before he became President he gave every indication of being yet another appeasement-oriented centrist, but he's actually gotten a surprising amount done. Biden has ended up being far better than I expected him to be.

[–] ashok36@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

If you'd told me we could virtually eliminate Russia's army and remove them as a competitor on the world stage for a couple billion bucks with no american troops in 2020 I would have taken that deal any day.

[–] jdsquared@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Now imagine what he could accomplish if the people in this thread who complain so much actually went out and grassroots volunteered and got some progressives elected in their districts.

[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

She understands that we are under attack by a global RW fascist insurgency. Keeping the GOP out of the WH will save democracy in the US and around the world. Any GOP winner would stand back and allow the russian terrorists to take Ukraine and beyond.

[–] TwoGems@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] figaro@lemdro.id 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Like I get that is what we probably are getting, and fine, he is better than whatever the republicans are putting forward, so I'll vote for him.

But

Come on

I wish, so much, we had a better candidate

[–] Falmarri@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What exactly has Biden done wrong? He may not be as crazy left wing as you'd prefer, but really I don't see why so many on the left are saying he's so bad

[–] Irlut_@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Although I think Biden has overall done a good job I am disappointed that they're running someone who is 80 years old. I would also like to see a general shift to the left, but at the same time I realize that the increased political division in the US makes this unlikely in the near term.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Giving up the incumbent advantage at a time like this is short sighted at best, and destructive and dangerous at worst.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

People always have some reason ready to roll out when telling you to settle for some shitty candidate you don't really like. I'm done with it. I compromised on Joe Biden to save America from Trump. I compromised in every election for my entire adult life. Now I'm voting for people I actually like. If the US is collectively dumb enough to go back to the GOP then we deserve the consequences of that choice.

You can call that selfish if you want but I've been waiting 35 years for the compromise candidate to be the one from my camp and there's always a bunch of armchair poly-sci experts coming out of the woodwork to explain why that would be irresponsible in the current political climate. Well too bad, I'm not voting for the geriatric anymore.

[–] TwoGems@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] whereisdani_r@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Isn't she eligible to run herself now? Things can absolutely get worse but can we try to have some imagination? Sigh

[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At least make her VP so when Bernie becomes a Force ghost, we've got someone on the inside at the top.

[–] whereisdani_r@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

what if he already is a force ghost 0_0

[–] littlebluespark@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I was there for the sparrow landing moment at the Moda center, back when. Literally 100ft from the podium (on the clock), and after that sight? I gotta say: I wouldn't be surprised.

[–] Ab_intra@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

To run for president you need to be at least 35. She is currently 33. This is the same for VP.

[–] whereisdani_r@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

AOC does turn 35 on 10/13/24, one month before the presidential election

[–] Sightline@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Let's fucking go, sick and tired of geriatric candidates.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

wtf is happening. This is a - rep for AOC in my eyes. She realizes the fucker is real old right? Elect someone younger please.