this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
87 points (89.2% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35566 readers
943 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I feel like it would be useful to know exactly how much alcohol is in a can or a bottle. Also why is alcohol the only thing measured in percentages and not sugar or caffeine or medicine?

top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BeefPiano@lemmy.world 80 points 10 months ago

ABV works for all types of packages. It could be helpful to know that a can of beer contains 18.6ml of alcohol, sure, but what about a bottle of whiskey or vodka? Is it better to know that it’s 40% alcohol or 300ml? Should a bar publish that a keg has 4.2 liters of alcohol in it?

With ABV you can compare alcohol across volumes.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 34 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

X% of the cans volume tells you the exact amount. You can know with very simple math. The reason why is because historically, alcohol drinks are taxed based on the concentration, or percentage, of alcohol. Beer would be taxed at a lower rate than say whisky. It was all based on the percentage, or "proof", of the beverage, not the actual amount. That way a small and large jug of whisky would be taxed at the same rate.

[–] Breve@pawb.social 31 points 10 months ago

There are medications that measure the active ingredient as a percentage too, like topical creams. I think it's done to make the relative strength easier to compare when the volume is varied. Labelling a keg of beer or a barrel of wine with the actual volume of alcohol it contains doesn't make it easy to tell the amount that would be in a single glass.

[–] theKalash@feddit.ch 25 points 10 months ago

I feel like it would be useful to know exactly how much alcohol is in a can or a bottle

They always list the total volume of the liquid so you can easily get the absolute alcohol content with the percentage.

[–] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't know, but sugar is usually in "g / 100g" so technically in percentage

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

In beverages, it's g/100ml.

[–] ebits21@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Which is basically the same since 1g of water is 1ml.

[–] venoft@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

In water yes, but not in sodas.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 10 points 10 months ago

The difference is quite small though right? Since a soda is still largely just water with sugar in it.

[–] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 months ago

Why? Because it's slightly heavier with all the sugar in it?

[–] vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 months ago

Alcohol drinks is vol% around here.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 14 points 10 months ago

Should be relatively easy to figure out if you know both the total amount of liquid and the percentage of alcohol.

100ml bottle that's 40% ABV would be 40ml of alcohol.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 11 points 10 months ago

As a consumer, I think it makes more sense to have the percentage by volume. Firstly, it makes the general pattern of alcohol content much clearer so we get a better intuition of what we're getting into. Beers generally hover around 5%, wines at 10-15%, and spirits at 20% and above.

Building on that, people don't generally remember the volume of pure alcohol they can handle, but they do remember, for example, that three glasses of wine is the most that they should drink. If you're presented beer, then along with your intuition of their relative alcohol content, you can easily approximate that you can handle about twice as much volume since it's about half the alcohol by volume. And similar if you have spirits, then you can reduce that volume to half or less.

How would you estimate it given a volume of alcohol instead? I know I can handle three glasses of this one particular kind of wine. If I have another type of wine with a different alcohol content and different bottle size, I'll have to math out how much alcohol will be in my glass: (Volume of glass)*(total alcohol context)/(Volume of wine bottle). Most people would give up before even trying to come up with this formula. Now how much alcohol did I have the last time when I had three glasses of wine? The bottle said something like 80ml of alcohol. But how big was it? That's two large numbers that you need to remember, and since they're so different from one bottle of wine to the next, you likely don't remember any of it.

Secondly, it affected flavour. In general, you can taste how much alcohol is in a certain drink and that depends on the relative volume of alcohol, not the absolute amount.

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Since krellor answered the main question:

I feel like it would be useful to know exactly how much alcohol is in a can or a bottle.

  • By volume: multiply ABV by the volume of the drink.
  • By weight: do the maths above, and then multiply the result by 0.789 g/ml.

RL example: the beer in my fridge is 350ml, 4.7% ABV. Doing the maths this is roughly 16.5ml of alcohol, or 13.0g.

[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Since everyone pretty much nailed the ABV% answer I’ll take a crack at the other. I’m guessing that the reason they don’t list other ingredients, like what food producers are required to do, is because most countries are concerned about the alcohol content more than anything else that’s in it.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago

A percentage is going to be more useful to a consumer than a volume anyway, especially for bottles that are consumed in part. 40% tells you a drink is going to be strong, without any further math based on whatever size drink you have poured yourself. If you wanted to know the volume alcohol of a poured drink, you'd have to linearly interpolate according to the size of glass you poured yourself, which is one step beyond just multiplying the alcohol percentage by the volume of the glass.

So in conclusion, labeling the volume of alcohol on a bottle is only practical for beer bottles and prepackaged cocktails, etc. If you do want to know the volume of alcohol consumed, simply multiply the volume of drink consumed by the ABV%.

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Australia does this right. Everything has a percentage.

Nutritional panels have:

  • Serving size
  • Servings in the pack
  • Energy, sugar, fat salt. etc per 100ml or 100g, and per serving.

Alcoholic beverages have "standard drinks" per bottle which factors in ABV and volume.

I can quickly see that a drink has 9g sugar per 100ml and know it's 9% sugar. Easy.

[–] Vash63@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Isn't this standard everywhere? I know it's like this in the Netherlands. I assume in America they give you the bald eagle feathers per egg or something too.

[–] jmd_akbar@aussie.zone 2 points 10 months ago

America give something useful for customers? No way... /s

[–] Spyro@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sucrose has a solubility of about 200 g/100 mL water. I’m in American so I’ve never seen Australian food labels, but would they really label a sugar-saturated drink as having 200% sugar? I guess technically you can do that, but it seems a bit weird. In my experience % is usually reserved for liquid in liquid solutions, like alcoholic beverages.

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The best example is the slab 'o' Coke from Woolies.

Sugar is marked as 10.6g/100ml and 39.8g per 375ml serve (yes, stupidly large), and 24 serves in the pack.

Syrups are typically sold in grams. But 200g of sugar and 100ml of water would be more than 100ml of total product by volume, and 300g by wileight. If anything, it would be labeled 66% sucrose because it's one third water.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Wouldn't it be lower than 8% sugar by volume since sugar is more dense than water?

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Don't most consumables list their volume?

1liter of beverage at 5% ABV is 50ml of alcohol. For example

[–] fine_sandy_bottom@aussie.zone 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There are special rules for labelling for alcohol given the obvious risks of consuming more than you realised.

Here alcohol must show the percentage alcohol content, but alcohol designed to be consumed as-is (without mixing) also states the number of standard drinks.

The number of standard drinks is the same as the "amount of alcohol" you mentioned.

Other ingredients like sugar aren't shown as a percentage because manufacturers don't want to show it, and it's not required by law because although there are risks of excess consumption, they're not "immediate risk to life" type risks.

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, NZ & Aus both have a 'standard drinks' system.

My guess is that larger quantities of alcohol (particularly bottles of spirits but also wine) simply aren't intended to be drunk by one person in one sitting. Total volume of alcohol isn't that useful; it's more useful to be able to work out how much is in one shot or one glass.

This is especially important when you look at the same product being sold by the shot/bottle/cask/barrel, or being able to buy a gallon of it in your own container historically.

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 1 points 10 months ago

Yep, in the UK we have both abv and units of alcohol on most drinks. So you can go by whichever makes most sense for you.

[–] solidgrue@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Labeling alcohol content by %ABV or %ABW is more versatile than absolute measure. Its also trivial to figure the absolute content given a specific volume.

In the US at least, there are regulations for packaging and labeling enforced by a federal agency. (I think that agency is Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF), but I could be wrong.) The label must include the %ABV or proof, and must also specify the volume. Every distiller and brewer must file a label for approval of every product and pay a free before the product can be packaged and sold. The fees are not trivial, and the approval takes time.

In the US, you can purchase liquor in bottles from 50mL all the way up to 1.75L, beer from 8oz (customary) to 750mL, and wine from 333mL up to a magnum (which volume I don't know off the top of my head), all with many sizes in between

Allowing for labeling the alcohol content in %ABV means the producer can package the same product in different sized units using the same approved label across the line. It saves on fees and administrative overhead.

edit to add: Another nuance of alcohol production and distribution in the US is bonding. There's a federal tax on all alcohol products made for consumption that is paid by the producer when the product leaves the production facility. Product is psckaged and held "in bond," a specific area of the facility where the product awaits sale and shipment. When it leaves Tue area, it must he recorded and taxes paid. It's serious business, and the ATF can sometimes pull licenses even for minor infractions.

To keep the math and record keeping easy, the producer tracks the number of units releaeed from bond, and usually reports and pays the duties on it quarterly. Since the duties are assessed by absolute volume, the duties are calculated by %ABV times times number of units.

[–] MyDearWatson616@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't mean to nitpick but where have you seen packaged 8oz beers in the US?

[–] Nemo@midwest.social 4 points 10 months ago

At the corner beer store. They're called ponies, and while uncommon are definitely a thing.

[–] aldalire@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago

You wouldn’t take a shot of beer with 5% ABV

Nor would you take a pitcher of vodka

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

To add to this, %ABV is what's actually measured by distillers when distilling, unless they're doing it entirely by smell/taste. The first and last parts will have less alchohol since everything evaporates off at different temperatures. (the tail is mostly water. the head, IIRC is mostly methanol or whatever else.)

The total amount of alchohol changes depending on how it's packaged or sold off, or if you're pouring a double, so people will need to do math anyhow; unless it's a single serving package. (and even then... they might not drink it all. blashphemy, I know.)

[–] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I doubt it will be of any benefit. How would it help if you knew that bottle of liqueur contans 125ml of pure alcohol? Or that bottle of Sauvignon Blanc contains 98ml? Or a can of beer 15ml?

I suppose you need to multiply. And you need to factor in all of that additional info anyways. How much wine do you drink? The whole bottle? How much alcohol can you tolerate? (What do you weigh...) And how much sugar is in the beverage, because that also affects things and is extra work for your liver, too.

But it's a good question. And sugar, caffeine etc are in fact measured in percentage. At least in europe you always have a measurement per 100ml or 100g written on the packaging, which is kind of the percentage. Interestingly enough it's not written on wine, liqueur etc.

[–] bouh@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think alcohol can't be kept pure in normal conditions, it would turn into a gas. So it is diluted by necessity. Knowing the full volume of the thing is certainly better than knowing only the quantity of alcohol without knowing the degree of dilution.

It is not the only product to be indicated this way. All diluted chemicals are. I think syrup is also?

[–] subtext@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The boiling point of pure ethanol is 78°C / 173°F [1], so it would not turn into a gas at normal conditions.

Pure ethanol is very hard to produce because it forms an azeotrope with water in the ~96% [1] range, meaning it cannot be distilled further than that, it must be separated by other means.

Alcohol in spirits is usually diluted because of taxes on higher percentage alcohol, consumer preference, or being able to make more bottles with the same amount of ethanol. I believe using percentages for alcohol began when ye olde England was putting taxes based on the percentage of alcohol in the drink [2].

[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethanol [2] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcohol_proof

[–] excitingburp@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

it would not turn into a gas at normal conditions.

It does: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vapor_pressure. In an airtight container you would have an equilibrium of alcohol vapor and liquid. In open-atmosphere, the atmosphere basically behaves like an infinitely large volume for the vapor - so the alcohol will completely vaporize (and cool the surface it is on in order to do so).

It's also trivial to demonstrate by pouring alcohol onto a surface, it disappears in seconds. Same with gasoline and numerous other liquids you've surely seen do this (another example is hand sanitizer, which is basically pure alcohol).

Being diluted doesn't really help with any of this though. Also alcohol is kept in bottles, which are usually airtight until they are first opened.

[–] subtext@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I mean sure, but you could say that about any liquid, or even any solid for that matter (with sublimation). But that’s not really what I was talking about when I responded.

[–] excitingburp@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It was what the GP was, though.

[–] subtext@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

To take your train of thought one step further, think about gasoline. Gasoline has a high vapor pressure, maybe even higher vapor pressure than ethanol. Would you say that gasoline is a liquid at normal conditions?

[–] excitingburp@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you throw gasoline out on to the pavement it will evaporate away. If you keep it in a gasoline can it will not. In a gasoline can the liquid and gas will reach equilibrium, though you'll certainly have slightly less liquid than what you started with. If the can isn't sealed then, yes, all the gasoline will eventually evaporate away - even at STP.

And, again, this is all trivial to test at home by using some hand sanitizer. Another example is your skin does not remain wet with water forever, despite human skin temperature not being 100°C. It's an everyday phenomena, I'm not sure what you're trying to argue against here. It's not my "line of thinking," it's objectively reality.

As for your distillation problem, the issue isn't that some alcohol remains in the water - it's that some water evaporates alongside the alcohol during the distillation process at the boiling point of alcohol - due to, guess what, vapor pressure. That's called an azeotrope - clicking through to that Wikipedia page might have helped.

[–] subtext@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago
[–] take6056@feddit.nl -1 points 10 months ago

Just thinking. Maybe there's a non linear relation between the uptake and the amount of alcohol. As for other products, they usually have a nutritional information table per 100g that you can thus read as percentages.