this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
128 points (95.1% liked)

Android

18880 readers
117 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

πŸ”—Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


πŸ’‘Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

πŸ’¬Matrix Chat

πŸ’¬Telegram channels / chats

πŸ“°Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 70 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It was a waste of time beginning to end. If they were smart, they were doing this for a quick cash grab. If they were dumb, then they legitimately thought this would work long-term.

[–] EarthlingHazard@lemm.ee 53 points 1 year ago

Whatever their motives are I'm glad it brought the interoperability conversation into the spotlight.

[–] habanhero@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 year ago

It's a marketing and publicity stunt, kinda like Nothing's fiasco with the Sunbird app. The goal is to get people talking about them and come out looking like the good guy underdog vs Apple. To be fair their plan is probably working judging by how many people are jumping out in front of Beeper and condemning "Big Apple", even though Apple is just doing what any service provider should be doing.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I just don't understand how anyone could base a company on an exploit. That is what it is in the end - the found an exploit and took advantage of it. Seems like the logical thing would be for apple to immediately close the exploit.

The answer is right there. If Apple wanted iMessage on Android it would be there. It isn't so they don't want it.

[–] LUHG_HANI@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Beeper isn't relying on this tho. It's whole USP is unified messaging and it wants iMessage.

[–] JWBananas@startrek.website 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Adversarial interoperability is not exploitative.

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes it is when they're not allowed to

[–] franklin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Would you characterize reactOS as exploitive?

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 year ago

No, it's not exploiting any active service for Microsoft

[–] GnomeComedy@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Beeper predates this new iMessage thing by a few years. You just hadn't heard of them apparently.

See news story from 2021:

https://www.theverge.com/2021/1/21/22242143/beeper-universal-chat-app-imessage-whatsapp-signal-telegram-pebble-founder

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

It was a waste of time beginning to end.

Sounded like the original effort was hobby reverse engineering for fun by a smart school kid and then Beeper went ahead and tried to turn it into a product.

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They need to go to the EU and get them to intervene! Only the EU can stand up to apple.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The EU doesn't care about iMessage. Almost nobody uses that thing over here. Usually Applie die hards try it out after new features have been released, try to convince everyone that it's the year of iMessage now, and move back to WhatsApp what the vast majority is actually using.

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

Oh I know.... I wasn't being serious. 😁

[–] leetnewb@beehaw.org 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mostly blame Apple for walling off the default text messaging app on the iOS platform. It is ridiculous to me that we are over 10 years into the smartphone era and are stuck in a duopoly with two players that would rather degrade communications between platforms than prioritize interoperability for some base level functionality. I hope that Beeper's campaign forces regulation that puts an end to the insanity.

[–] janabuggs@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

Remember when Android was entirely open source?

[–] kowcop@aussie.zone 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why not go whinge to Google to develop a messaging system that Apple users want to integrate with..

[–] MiddledAgedGuy@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They did. RCS. And it sounds like Apple will be adopting it due to regulatory pressure. But the idea of "Apple users will want to integrate with" has a flaw. A lot of their userbase happily drinks the Kool-aid and want their walled garden, even if it's not in their best interest.

[–] kowcop@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe there is no kool-aid and it is just better, hence why these apps exist. As you said, RCS is coming yet people still aren’t happy. It sounds like Google can’t make a decent messaging app and is mobilising it’s user base to force the issue instead of innovating

[–] MiddledAgedGuy@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Apple definitely came out with the better messaging product first. But RCS has nearly all the same features as iMessage.

Maybe it's not drinking the kool-aid, Apple does make a good product. But since integrating RCS has no negative impact to them, and allows them to use those features with more people, why wouldn't they want it?

Maybe, generally speaking on the userbase. I'm personally not interested in promoting Android or Google. I begrudgingly use it, but I'm not a fan. I am interested in interoperability, which this gives us.

Edit: Redundant

[–] habanhero@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

surprised_pikachu_face.png.jpg

[–] ijeff@lemdro.id 1 points 1 year ago