this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
170 points (96.7% liked)

Games

32344 readers
741 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

WipeOut was Sony’s initial first-party exclusive for the original PlayStation when it launched back in 1995. The anti-gravity racing game was phenomenal. Now it’s abandoned. So one dedicated programmer took it upon himself to excavate the game’s leaked source code and make it playable for free in any web browser.

“Either let it be, or shut this thing down and get a real remaster going,” he told Sony...

top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Frogster8@lemmy.world 76 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, what? They'll just shut it down and NOT make a remaster surely

[–] Call_Me_Maple@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean yeah, that's typically how it works but...

He's double dawg daring them.

[–] Retrograde@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

You don't just double dawg dare for no reason, you know

[–] ElPussyKangaroo@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why can't we get a law going that if you stop supporting some software product, game or otherwise, you should open source it and hand over control to the public?

[–] nomecks@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

Because corporations get the laws written.

[–] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Games should be public domain after 25 years, everything else at 50.

[–] infotainment@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why not everything? Honestly even 25 years seems too long, make it 10.

[–] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

some book series take longer than that to finish

[–] Sendbeer@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Might give George Martin some incentive to finish Winds of Winter though.

[–] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think he even knows how to finish it

[–] Sendbeer@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh yeah I agree. It's got to be a challenge to bring all his characters and plot lines together. Sadly, I think the show is the only ending we are going to get.

[–] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

I think it is the Lost problem. He's got all these hints and foreshadowing going and no idea where they're actually going. Disappointing and evidence of lazy writing, so I've stopped reading his works overall

[–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah but if someone wants to write their own sequel to a first book, before the series is done, that's fine. Still not canon, just fanfic that can make a profit, and that sounds fine to me.

[–] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What happens when grifters generate a billion AI knockoffs and an artist can't protect their intellectual property

[–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The above was advocating for a 25-year period between publishing and public domain. They'll have to somehow pay that mortgage with a quarter of a century of profit somehow.

New books get new protections anyway, so a 25-year-old series only loses book 1 to public domain. They can also release new editions of book 1 with new (canon) content, and those new things get new protections, too.

[–] Cleverdawny@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

10, actually, is what he said

[–] TeoTwawki@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I think at a minimum if you stop publishing and supporting your own work you shouldn't get to cry copyright whem somebody else does. For that context 10 certainly seems plenty long..

[–] Aesk@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

The WipeOut games for the PSP were pretty great. Shame this whole genre has vanished from big publishers. A new WipeOut and a new F-Zero would make my year.

[–] dpkonofa@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sony will just shut it down, seize his code, and then release it as paid content. He has no legs to stand on. It’s a damn travesty.

[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Should have just made a spiritual successor

[–] dpkonofa@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

This is more of a preservation thing, I think. The guy is clearly not interested in the theft or harm of the game. He’s doing this because he thinks this old-ass game is so good that more people should play it.

[–] Skua@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be fair there are already quite a few of those. Pacer (which used to be called Formula Fusion), Redout, and BallisticNG are all already out

[–] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Redout is a bit closer to F-Zero, BeamNG is definitely a full blown Wipeout clone. It got even the pixel look from the first game.
Still not the greatest presence on the PC for this genre, unfortunately.

[–] eleefece@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

How about this: I shut down the game, don't release anything and sue you to oblivion... Yeah, I'll probably do that - Sony (most likely)

[–] DingoBilly@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Guy is a moron.

Better to be quiet about it than to try and bait the multi-billion company whether they're willing to chase up their copyrighted game or not.

[–] yoyogamer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Please tell me that this thing is open source

[–] soyagi@yiffit.net 12 points 1 year ago

The source code of the original game was leaked last year.

https://phoboslab.org/log/2023/08/rewriting-wipeout

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

lol…. Threatening a major company with no leverage. Let’s see how this plays out.

Sony is going to ruin that dudes life.

[–] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

While the variety, quality and especially scope isn't great, I wouldn't call it abandoned. Especially ~~BeamNG~~ BallisticNG has been one of the more successful ones and Redout 1 was also fairly well received. There generally hasn't been a big presence for this genre on the PC unfortunately.

[–] Krompus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

BallisticNG is awesome, and so is Redout. FYI Redout and all DLC tracks is part of Fanatical's Build Your Own Play on the Go Bundle right now, get it and two other games for 5 $/£/€: https://www.fanatical.com/en/pick-and-mix/build-your-own-play-on-the-go-bundle

[–] gerryflap@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Damn that's a very good deal. From the price I suspected that it was just another grey market key seller, but from all that I can find it's actually legit. Thanks for sharing!

[–] Krompus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Nah Fanatical is legit, they've got good sales and bundles now and then, I get alerts about them from IsThereAnyDeal.

[–] Call_Me_Maple@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Wait we're talking about the same BeamNG right? Like BeamNG Drive? Last I checked that game is not in the same genre as Redout and WipeOut.

[–] Skua@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Pretty sure they mean BallisticNG, which actually a Wipeout-alike

[–] Call_Me_Maple@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Ahh, I see. I'll have to check it out. :)

[–] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

That's what happens when you write comments at the end of a day. I blame their names to be too similar. lol