this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
598 points (98.2% liked)

Technology

59288 readers
4364 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

FCC chair wants to boost broadband standard to 100Mbps::First refresh of minimums in eight years for the country that invented the internet

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fkn@lemmy.world 122 points 1 year ago (5 children)

My God is American internet awful

[–] PeterPoopshit@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you have 100mbps of non bandwidth capped internet in America, you're doing damn good for yourself.

[–] nowwhatnapster@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

But what if it costs $95/mo, there are no alternatives and the price has nearly doubled in 10 years from $55?

I sure don't feel that great.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] eatham@aussie.zone 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's a lot better than Australian internet. I'm getting 20-50mbps

[–] Ser_Salty@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I had 2Mbps (yes, bits, not bytes) until 2020. Then I moved out. Pretty sure that my parents house still only gets that same speed. And this is in fucking Germany, a pretty densely populated country.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fkn@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

That sucks too...

[–] Nioxic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can ONLY get 1gbit, where i live. (Denmark)

[–] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago

Denmark is also around 1/200th of the size of the us.

[–] Mysterious_old_man@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

It depends. I grew up in the country and my parents still have to use phone hotspots for internet which works well for streaming but forget about any gaming. I live in a fairly major metropolitan city now and my internet is pretty good, although I've noticed my download speeds get throttled sometimes

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

It can be, but I live in a semi-rural neighborhood outside of a town that doesn't even have 100,000 people and I'm still getting 400/400 on fiber (and can get higher speeds if I want to pay for them).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Saff@lemmy.ml 59 points 1 year ago (4 children)

If you’re going to initiate a new rollout of tech, why rollout already out of date stuff? Just mandate fibre to the prem and 1 gigabit minimum from the start. It will take 15 years to complete anyway!

[–] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Government officials in areas where 100 Mbps internet isn’t already available are too busy making sure trans people can’t use the toilet or play high school sports.

[–] legion02@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They're also waiting for their trans porn to download.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JakoJakoJako13@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

That's way too hard for this country.

[–] brightandshinyobject@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How will the isps get another government grant to roll out the next bit of outdated tech?

[–] Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

How will the isps get another government grant to ~~roll out the next bit of outdated tech~~ outright refuse to update any infrastructure and perform stock buybacks instead?

FTFY. Google the Connect America Fund if you want your blood pressure to spike. ISPs are notorious for taking taxpayer money and doing fuck-all with it.

They are fucking all of us with it. Does that count?

Sure, but how is that going to make more money for rich people?

[–] brightandshinyobject@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How is that not already the standard?

[–] picassowary@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

where i live my choices are fixed beam wireless internet that caps out at about 75mbps, at&t dsl that caps at 10mbps, satellite or i guess Starlink

[–] brightandshinyobject@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But it's a healthy and competitive market right?

[–] picassowary@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

super healthy, very competitive

did i mention that i barely get 5G service at my home but if i walk 100ft down to the street i get service?

[–] brightandshinyobject@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gotta love that, there are technically two providers in my area, no fiber, one of them supports asymmetric gigdown/30 up for $130/month cable and 60 mb dsl fo $70/momth. My mother who lives 15 minutes from me has symmetric gigabit fiber for $70 from the same provider that does DSL for me.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At my house I get 500mbps. My store (40 miles away) gets 15mbps. I pay significantly less at home.

Not just that but you have to pay extra to avoid a data cap on the 15mbps line.

[–] brightandshinyobject@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Datacaps are incredibly annoying, they are just a cash grab.

[–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Absolutely. That’s exactly what they are.

[–] overzeetop@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not only that, 100Mbps is so 2018. Quit pussy-footing around, FCC, make the standard 1Gbps, both ways. And make bandwidth caps illegal. I'm lucky enough to not have one but for years I had to put up with a 1TB limit from those Cox suckers until Verizon came to town.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do United States really doesn't want to live in the 21st century does it?

The slowest speed by internet service provider offers is 250mbps.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

We spent like 5k per household to get fiber everywhere in the US. Then the companies who were supposed to do it just decided to take the money and not do it.

[–] soulifix@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

And the government continues to give them more money. I've figured it out now.

People want better broadband. ISPs promise to broaden internet. Government gives money. ISPs spend a considerable amount of the promise of better broadband in marketing. Doesn't happen. People still want better broadband. ISPs promise again. Government gives more money. ISPs continue spending on marketing.

Over and over.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kemsat@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago
[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Didn't we already pay for the infrastructure?

[–] bappity@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

is this about that Connect America Fund where the ISPs took all the money and did fuck all

[–] brightandshinyobject@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

You'd think that would be criminal

[–] rusticus1773@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 year ago

Welcome to the United States, where consumers built the internet infrastructure that monopolies profit from and fight tooth and nail to prevent communities from providing high speed internet to its residents. Capitalism at its most corrupt: privatize profits and socialize capital costs and losses.

[–] jb007gd@lemmy.one 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What about net neutrality? Does anyone remember net neutrality? I'd like that back please. I'd also like the opportunity to publicly flog Ajit Pai as long as we're dreaming.

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

I would be content with just stealing his comically oversized Reese's mug.

[–] bappity@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] 3laws@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have 150Mbps and pay $570 Mexican Pesos which right now is about $35 USD but last year was $28 USD due to the Peso doing significantly better and the USD kinda crashing.

Still, it's not enough for my client work, piracy and live streaming needs since it's non symmetrical, I only get 30Mbps upload.

I got receipts 📜:

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mr_tyler_durden@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Gigabit symmetrical or GTFO.

I pay something like $110/mo for my symmetrical gigabit fiber line (plus static IP). This should be the standard, not 100Mbps.

[–] Jmr@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

sometimes I really worry for the US

[–] nostradiel@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I pay 30$ for 1Gb/s down, 250Mb/s up. It's usually around 40$ in the Czech Republic.

[–] BrrooklynMan@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

why just 100Mbps? why not 250? that’s still pretty simple for them to do. also: net neutrality, dammit!

[–] TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

And at least 50 up?

[–] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

$40 for 2Gb/s symmetrical FTW!

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Lucky bastard

Also, where, and how?

[–] mhz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I'm paying $25 fo a 20mbps ADSL, but I only get 16down/1up due to the cable degradation.

load more comments
view more: next ›