this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
863 points (98.8% liked)

politics

18894 readers
3006 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DannyMac@lemmy.world 190 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's depressing that something like that is needed in the first place.

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 73 points 10 months ago (9 children)

Yeah it is. I've actually heard people make this argument too. How stupid do you have to be to believe that?

[–] spider@lemmy.nz 46 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

How stupid do you have to be to believe that?

stupid enough to re-elect DeSantis

[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

Ol' Pudding Fingers, himself, king of the Go-Go boots! The meatball-iest of Rons!

[–] constantokra@lemmy.one 23 points 10 months ago

Having read the standards, possibly the worst part about them is that it's not written such that you have to teach that racist bs, but it's obviously written to give cover to those who do. So it's not so much that it's supporting a bullshit way of looking at slavery as an institution in the past. It's really supporting the horrible people who continue to think that way today, and enabling them to pass it on to a new generation.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They're not stupid, but they're trying to ensure the next generation is.

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Ugh... yeah you're probably right

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Alright I'll bite. Why did it help?

[–] drislands@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago (3 children)

IIRC, the common argument is that modern Black Americans have great opportunities by virtue of being in America. Without slavery, they would have been born in Africa.

This is ludicrous for a variety of reasons. It's the same kind of thinking that leads to people saying your relative died "because of God's plan", as if suffering always has a good reason to it.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 months ago

They overlook the destabilization of Africa that went on during colonialism that led to its current state

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

The lesson Florida is teaching is that slaves learned 'useful skills.' They don't say who those skills were useful to though.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] oxjox@lemmy.ml 42 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Our government is broken.

We shouldn't need to pass a bill to prevent lies and irrational theories from being taught. Honestly, I can't think of a reason why government should be telling teachers what they should be discussing at all (just like telling mothers how to deal with their health) - other than ensuring that children be given the best opportunities in the real world.

new standards published by the Florida State Board of Education earlier this year, which included language on “how slaves developed skills which, in some instances, could be applied for their personal benefit.”

How the hell does a school board even exist that could adopt this? This should never have passed in the first place. There's too many bandaids in government resolving things that shouldn't have ever been passed by idiots in the first place.

How the hell can anyone (DeSantis) continue being a government leader while claiming that slavery is beneficial?

This is what happens when people have little choice in elections but to vote for the candidates they dislike the least. We don't get to vote for people we like, for people we believe to represent our values. We're screwed by a two party system that's funded by corporations and legislated by lobbyists. Ranked. Choice. Voting.

[–] HorseWithNoName@lemm.ee 12 points 10 months ago

I had a sociology professor who taught us about Harriett Jacobs as a counter to racist claims like this (because apparently students now have to have evidence to back up why slavery was bad. That's where we are.)

Harriet Jacobs lived in a crawl space for seven years after escaping her enslavers until she could make it to the north. I wish I could find the video we watched, but it basically said it was so small she couldn't even stand up. That would be considered torture in other circumstances. And imagine living in a crawl space with no heat in the winter or AC in the summer, in the South? But it was still preferable to being property.

[–] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago (2 children)

How the hell does a school board even exist that could adopt this?

Florida is a retirement state full of old white people. They are the last vestiges of racism in its old form. Of course those old assholes are pushing back against the idea that it was their families that caused racial inequality in America.

It's like when descendants of Nazis try to say that their own grandpappy didn't do any of the killing, he just had the swastika on his uniform he wasn't that bad.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SCB@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

We shouldn’t need to pass a bill to prevent lies and irrational theories from being taught. Honestly, I can’t think of a reason why government should be telling teachers what they should be discussing at all (just like telling mothers how to deal with their health) - other than ensuring that children be given the best opportunities in the real world.

We have a public school system, and you very much want that public school system regulated. You cannot ensure that students have opportunities without regulating education.

What you don't want is fucking lunatics in your legislature, saying things like "slavery good."

This is what happens when people have little choice in elections but to vote for the candidates they dislike the least.

Their candidates ran on exactly this. This was their campaign promise. Their voters got exactly what they wanted.

Government isn't broken. People are.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

How the hell does a school board even exist that could adopt this? This should never have passed in the first place.

Because Republicans aren't like Democrats when it comes to strategy (that is to say, awful). This is happening at school boards across the country. It's a concerted effort to pack these boards with Christian nationalist lunatics. And they've been quite successful so far, there hasn't been much push back until recently, but by now they already have a lot of control.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 39 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The only good thing about Florida is eventually climate change will destroy it

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

hopefully, we can wall Florida off before that happens. you know. and make them pay for it.

[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

maybe we can figure something out.... I jest, mostly. It just really pisses me off that as a whole Floridians are going against climate change- and immigration/refugees as hard as they are, despite a simple fact that they're about become internally displaced refugees themselves. (okay, so 'about' is maybe a decade away? or three.)

kind of like how certain people were voting against aid for hurricane victims, then demanding FEMA aid when it hit them.

[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The problem is that Florida is actually fairly purple, but gerrymandering, voter suppression, etc. are altering the outcomes of our elections.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

I could see that.
Fuck Gerry and his mandering ways.

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 37 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Even with a lobotomy i wouldnt come up with such braindead takes as "black people benefited from slavery". As sane as saying homeless people benefit from fentanyl addiction or that african people benefit from hunger.

[–] Omnificer@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

It's white man's burden BS slipping back in, where people (like Robert E. Lee) would say "We don't want to enslave these people, it's just our duty to civilize them."

I assume it's some kind of mechanism for maintaining their cognitive dissonance.

[–] antidote101@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

There's a clip where white supremacist Richard B. Spencer (who has family ties to plantation history) argues the point against UK Guardian writer Gary Younge.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=puJ-arJgkZU

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They benefited from being in a nation different from their own

...said the guy who wants to form an ethnostate

I swear man people just don't have functioning brains

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SCB@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Homeless people should clearly all be given cocaine so that they are less hungry. I mean c'mon!

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 5 points 10 months ago

And more productive!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Good. Put out a plain bill that bans something they claim won't happen, and get them on record.

DeSantis is going to invariably weigh in on this and make things even worse for himself

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 24 points 10 months ago (2 children)

"get them on record" nobody cares about that shit anymore when they have an 'R' next to their name. Pointing out the hypocrisy has been a waste of time for a long time. They don't care.

[–] Phlogiston@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

correct. getting them on record doesn't do shit -- but making sure they are legally liable if they do try that bullshit might help.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)

We have Trump on record admitting that he committed tons of crimes.

He’s still allowed to lead this country.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 28 points 10 months ago

The great thing about this is that any argument against this which isn't explicitly focused on confronting the racial aspect, is an argument against the Don't Say Gay law.

[–] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If racism doesn't exist anymore why do we need this?

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Didn't you hear? Racism officially ended when Obama got elected! We did it everyone!

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I love that the same people who say that will turn around and say Obama wasn't born in America.

[–] Saltblue@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

We need to know Obama's last name

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Good. Black people did not.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And while we're at it, neither did Native Americans. And we enslaved them far longer than we enslaved black people:

This practice continued throughout the colonial era aided and encouraged by Native American tribes themselves up through 1750 and, after the American War of Independence (1775-1783), natives were pushed into the interior as African slavery became more lucrative. Even so, the enslavement of Native Americans continued even after slavery was abolished by the 13th Amendment to the Constitution in 1865. Americans got around illegal enslavement of natives by calling it by other names and justified it in the interests of "civilizing the savages". The practice continued up through 1900, dramatically impacting Native American cultures, languages, and development.

https://www.worldhistory.org/article/1742/native-american-enslavement-in-colonial-america/

Guess how much of that they teach in U.S. schools?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Saying that black people benefited from slavery is like saying a kidnapping is beneficial when people are rescued from it.

This is cognitive dissonance if I've ever seen it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Breaking news: Teaching children blatantly, shamelessly false information is bad. More on this unexpected development at 11!

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Hopefully more on this Tuesday November 5th 2024

[–] rchive@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago

Everyone is talking past each other on this issue.

https://www.wral.com/story/fact-check-does-a-new-florida-curriculum-teach-that-enslaved-people-benefited-from-slavery/20971401/

Some people who don't know anything are arguing that enslaved people literally benefited from slavery, but that's not what started this discussion.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Mm, yes, and what would happen if they tried to take these "transferable" skills and make money elsewhere?

Fucken rubes, how did we end up here?

[–] TechyDad@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (3 children)

This was exactly my view when this whole "black people learned valuable skills from slavery" thing came up.

Let's say it was true. Jim is a slave and he's learned a few valuable skills due to being a slave. How can Jim use those skills? It's not like he can just tell his master "I've decided to quit and open my own business." He's literally a slave. His entire being is owned by his master.

The only way he might be able to put those skills to good use would be to flee slavery. Even then, though, he'd first need to avoid capture or being killed. He'd have needed to make his way north to Canada. Former slaves couldn't just stop in a Northern "free" state because the South got a law passed to allow them to go into Northern states and drag escaped slaves (and sometimes free black people) back to the South.

The best case scenario for this "slave that learned valuable skills" is that they might be able to use those skills only after a perilous escape and journey during which they risked dying in a multitude of ways. There is no way that "but they learned useful skills" makes slavery any less horrific.

[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

No no no. They simply had to wait fifteen generations until the rules of slavery changed in 1865, at which point Black people were suddenly treated perfectly well and had access to all the opportunities of other Americans.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I refuse to have this argument in real life. This is the kind of shit politicians should be threatening fights over.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

because the South got a law passed to allow them to go into Northern states and drag escaped slaves (and sometimes free black people) back to the South.

remember this when they try to cast the civil war as being about "states' rights". They wanted the federal government to stomp on the rights of free states. They put in their constitution that no confederate state had the right to be a free state. They tried to use force and violence to annex free states. They didn't give a fuck about states' rights. Anytime a conservative is talking about freedom he's talking about two freedoms in particular:

  1. his freedom to do what he wants

  2. his freedom to use violence to force you to do what he wants

load more comments
view more: next ›