this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
863 points (98.8% liked)

politics

18894 readers
3462 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Mm, yes, and what would happen if they tried to take these "transferable" skills and make money elsewhere?

Fucken rubes, how did we end up here?

[–] TechyDad@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (3 children)

This was exactly my view when this whole "black people learned valuable skills from slavery" thing came up.

Let's say it was true. Jim is a slave and he's learned a few valuable skills due to being a slave. How can Jim use those skills? It's not like he can just tell his master "I've decided to quit and open my own business." He's literally a slave. His entire being is owned by his master.

The only way he might be able to put those skills to good use would be to flee slavery. Even then, though, he'd first need to avoid capture or being killed. He'd have needed to make his way north to Canada. Former slaves couldn't just stop in a Northern "free" state because the South got a law passed to allow them to go into Northern states and drag escaped slaves (and sometimes free black people) back to the South.

The best case scenario for this "slave that learned valuable skills" is that they might be able to use those skills only after a perilous escape and journey during which they risked dying in a multitude of ways. There is no way that "but they learned useful skills" makes slavery any less horrific.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

because the South got a law passed to allow them to go into Northern states and drag escaped slaves (and sometimes free black people) back to the South.

remember this when they try to cast the civil war as being about "states' rights". They wanted the federal government to stomp on the rights of free states. They put in their constitution that no confederate state had the right to be a free state. They tried to use force and violence to annex free states. They didn't give a fuck about states' rights. Anytime a conservative is talking about freedom he's talking about two freedoms in particular:

  1. his freedom to do what he wants

  2. his freedom to use violence to force you to do what he wants

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I refuse to have this argument in real life. This is the kind of shit politicians should be threatening fights over.

[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No no no. They simply had to wait fifteen generations until the rules of slavery changed in 1865, at which point Black people were suddenly treated perfectly well and had access to all the opportunities of other Americans.

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Forget where I heard this but "slavery didn't just end like a no-wipe shit."

[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I definitely remember Trevor Noah saying that.

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

Might have been Louis cause I've never watched Noah