this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
346 points (94.6% liked)

politics

19240 readers
2411 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Jacob Chansley, sentenced to three years for his role in the Capitol riots, will run as a libertarian in Arizona.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 166 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The 14th Amendment disqualifies him.

[–] procrastitron@lemmy.world 136 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

It only applies if he took an oath to uphold the constitution prior to committing the treason.

I.E. government officials and ex military personnel who took place in the Jan 6 riots would be disqualified, but not every random yahoo that was there.

EDIT: Others have pointed out that he is ex-military, so it looks like the 14th amendment does apply to him after all.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] nocturne213@lemm.ee 119 points 1 year ago (1 children)

will run as a libertarian in Arizona

Neither of these surprises me.

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Libertarians are just Republicans in disguise

[–] halferect@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Libertarians are even worse, they are like anarchist Republicans. Slamming two dumb political ideas into one really dumb political idea and acting like they are very smart about it.

[–] Fester@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Republicans have to deal with being constantly proven wrong on everything, but Libertarians enjoy that their fantasy ideology will never be tested in the real world. That makes them feel immune to obvious criticisms, and therefore “very smart.”

[–] halferect@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

They did test it and it failed completely. A book was written about it. A libertarian walks into a bear. So you can point and laugh at libertarians any time you want

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

They are trying to make Meta from Facebook

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 103 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Jacob Chansley can eat a whole cauldron of gently boiled dicks.

[–] negativeyoda@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

He's vegan or something. Remember how butthurt he was in prison because the food wasn't up to his standards?

White people, man...

[–] Piecemakers3Dprints@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] CthuluVoIP@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago

He has very specific dietary needs. His mommy said so.

[–] saltnotsugar@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don’t ruin a whole batch of cocks by overheating!

[–] metallic_substance@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Vigorous boiling or stirring may cause dicks to break up while cooking and nobody wants that

[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah cooked dicks is a dish best served whole

[–] CascadianGiraffe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

'parts of lots of dicks'

just doesn't roll off the tongue like

'whole lotta dicks'

Maybe we're making dick slaw

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Retention of texture while emphasizing natural flavour

[–] modifier@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago

I hope that, once a year, at the most inopportune possible time of that year, he shits himself loudly and thoroughly. For all the years of his life.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Is this like, an ordeal you think he should go through, or are you saying that you know for a fact, that this man can slurp down a whole caludron of al-dente dicks?

[–] rob64@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't forget to let the dicks rest for a few minutes before serving.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

We don't want to burn the back of his throat.

[–] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 54 points 1 year ago

Good deal. Let him siphon off the republican vote.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

Gee, let me think about it. According to this article he may be uniquely suited to run as a Republican.

In an interview, defense lawyer Albert Watkins said that officials at the federal Bureau of Prisons, or BOP, have diagnosed his client Jacob Chansley with transient schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depression and anxiety.

If you throw in a low IQ, he'll do well with Republican voters.

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Felons can't run for office

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure they can and do.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In 2016, the libertarian convention had a guy strip to his underwear on stage. At the convention debate, one of the candidates was boo'd for saying you shouldn't be able to sell heroin to five year olds.

The QAnon Shaman isn't the craziest thing in the Libertarian Party. They are not serious people.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

will run as a libertarian in Arizona.

Well at least we won't have to worry about him winning.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It is just a money maker for him.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Getting some "Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho"-vibes from this, lol

[–] throbbing_banjo@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

For all his flaws, Camacho at least tried to enlist the help of, and listen to, people he knew were smarter than him. And at the end of the day, he tried to help his people.

This guy just wants to play dress up and smear shit on the walls.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

This guy is t elligible…. Trump might be able to weasel it, but this guy was an insurrectionist through and through.

[–] AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He'd best have a good security detail. If anything goes awry, a bunch of Leftists are going to be peacefully asking him pointed questions that might make him uncomfortable.

If you're assuaged to believe that winning means everything, I can't speak for you. It assumes that you start and stay on the same side of any moral argument and you have to fight for it to the end regardless of if new evidence nullifies your opinion.

That's not how humans understand each-other. Humans garner nuance and discern things in new and meaningful ways over time and social interaction. We understand others - people that we can identify with in profound ways even if they don't necessarily share our point of view.

I would give him a moment of our time - maybe 30 seconds if he doesn't state one of the over-used vitriolic statements on the Bingo cards that I will be handing out now.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think he’s in a well protected place lol

[–] AgentOrangesicle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Agreed, he is, but not from internet rhetoric.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He and Bimbert can have a dumb-off for that seat.

[–] dpkonofa@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Uh…She’s not in AZ…

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He should be required to wear that costume the entire time on the campaign trail.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No argument here. But if he’s out and running, no one should forget what a weirdass goofball he is.

[–] Piecemakers3Dprints@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If only he'd wear it during hunting season, maybe with some female elk piss on it?

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

You'd be more productive sticking a fork in an outlet, Jacob.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

What a crazy world we live in.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Republicans stopped using "cuck" as an insult because the person who epitomizes what they're all about wore horns.