this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
1158 points (97.2% liked)

tumblr

3480 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world 118 points 1 year ago (16 children)

Writing and playing tabletop RPG horror one gets a real sense of what horror is just a little too personal to be fun. There's a whole lot of safety tools the community has developed (actually crossing over a bit with the BDSM community's tools for safe consent when acting out a fiction). It's really common to survey all players with an exhaustive list of all the potential horrors one could potentially bring to a table. The top five that are people's no gos are sexual violence, harm to animals, reproductive horror, harm to children and body horror.

A lot of horror movie fans are not prepared for how you having agency in the situation of tabletop storytelling can make something you can easily handle watching suddenly effect you even when it's just being described and can misjudge their level of chill and need to tap out mid game. Typical advice on reproductive horror a'la Alien is don't even bother writing a reproductive horror that directly effects a player character. Damn near every table taps out for that, if not the player targeted then someone else at the table.

Alien de-gendering that horror was definitely a masterstroke. There's good reason the chestburster reached cultural saturation.

[–] Piecemakers3Dprints@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Let's not forget that no one on-screen in that specific scene other than the host (John Hurt) was aware that the character was swapped for a neck-down prosthetic, so every single reaction by each actor was genuinely horrific in that they each "saw" a prop explode out of a human body. IIRC, the director went on to pay for counseling for most (all?) of said actors after the fact.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did not know this. That makes it way wilder, and also a much better movie. I do feel bad for the actors in this situation, but also no better method acting than watching your costar literally explode next to you as a chestburster comes out with zero knowledge that it was carefully planned by the special effects team. Also, big gamble. If someone broke character, they would have to redo the whole thing. Shock value is gone, all the special effects prep work has to be redone, everybody already wants to vomit, etc

[–] Piecemakers3Dprints@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While this is true, I want you to go back and rewatch that scene with special attention to Parker (Yaphet Kotto, also the first black Bond villain!) and tell me that guy didn't catch some serious trauma from that "gamble". 🥹

[–] revdrnegative@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

He was the first one to pop into my mind while reading about that. That looks..

[–] godot@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don’t often get a chance to talk about it, but Lover in the Ice is a fascinating, well regarded module that dives directly into the sort of sexual horror you’ve correctly pointed out as way off all but the most extreme table.

I’m certain, to my bones, that I could run a life changing version of Lover in the Ice. It will never happen. Even my few players who have given me the green light on that sort of content would I suspect tap out pretty fast, and I don’t blame them. I don’t think most people who just play realize how far TTRPGs can go.

I’m okay with never running that story. I get a lot reading modules like that for perspective; when GMs recoil at the thought of running that content it shows them how much more vulnerable they, and their players, are to that sort of horror relative to a shoggoth in the basement. That should prompt them toward creativity in looking for or writing other scenarios.

I do wonder what proportion of people who buy modules like that play them.

[–] 0xD@infosec.pub 9 points 1 year ago

Not sure how much it fits online but I've never played a horror TTRPG and I'd love to try it! I like extreme stuff!

[–] Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I am usually just kind of unphased by the idea of reproductive or sexual horror when it's not directed at my PC's personally but being ace and with no history of sexual assault I find it doesn't affect me any different than any other kind of horror? Like I have read my share of true crime and awful shit and I can see how it just segments into something just genuinely horrific but my brain just treats it as a straight up no different than a torture theme. I can find other people's reactions to it waaay more unsettling though so I could never run it myself and I know a number of people in my cohort who have been in domestic violence and sexual assault scenarios irl and it would break my heart if any of them were triggered at a table I was at.

I've definitely been at tables which used sexual horror themes in lazy, trashy ways that made me think poorly of the GM but I have seen it used thematically well twice and only once where it didn't cause an X card tap out by someone who honestly thought they would be okay.

High risk TTRPGs can be ridiculously rewarding and some of the best games I've played were ones that danced really close to the wire of being not okay.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] clayh@lemmy.ml 106 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also the original screenplay only listed the characters’ last names, so that any actor could play any role, regardless of gender.

[–] MinusPi@yiffit.net 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is how fiction should be written imo

[–] ech@lemm.ee 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it's a good general rule, but any story regarding gender is going to need specifically gendered characters to tell that story. Writing that kind of story off completely is needlessly prohibitive.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago

Even when gender is not the focus of the story, I feel that this risks "male default-ism" and sometimes erases femininity out of female protagonists. Not that women have to be feminine, but I find that fiction often defaults on that "girl boss™" trope to make women fit in the tropes of the genre they are in where male protagonists have traditionally solved all their problems with violence and kicking ass (I remember Lindsay Ellis complaining about that girl boss trope in a video essay but it's been a while).

I guess it comes back around to what you're saying, women in most times and places don't have the luxury of being able to ignore their gender. In such a setting, if you make your protagonist a woman, she's either going to have to be so much "one of the boys" that no-one acknowledges her as a woman... or the story is going to have to deal with gender in some way.

[–] WhiteHawk@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I disagree. There are too many challenges unique to being male/female to be able to write a convincing story without specifying the characters' genders. There are exceptions, of course.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 70 points 1 year ago

It should also be noted that the alien was designed to resemble a sexualized androgyny while also being sufficiently alien to be unsettling, it’s a huge part of the art of the designer of it

[–] SuperJetShoes@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I saw this movie at the cinema in 1979 when it was released. I was 14, therefore 4 years too young to see it (UK, "X Certificate), but a member of friend group with a gruff voice went to the ticket office).

Large cinema, packed out, lots of excited mumbling until the film started.

After the face-hugger jump shot, total and absolute silence. And the at the chest-burster scene... absolute chaos. Screams. Real screams, not happy roller coaster screams. A few people leaving, unable to take it.

And it got me. It hit me hard. I had deliberately avoided any description of the movie so had no expectations, and then this happened, ,right there in front of me. The gore, the realistic acting, the pain of John Hurt...oh my...

That set the scene for the rest of the movie and you knew they weren't fucking about.

It traumatized me for weeks. Superb movie.

Edited on request.

[–] jaywalker@lemm.ee 38 points 1 year ago

It got me hard.

ಠ⁠_⁠ಠ

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You gotta change that to "it got me bad" or "it fucked me up"

It took seeing someone else's reaction to figure out that this isn't you saying it sparked an interest in guro in you

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mriormro@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, conceptually, sure that's a very scary thing that happens within the movie. I don't think that's the scariest thing about the movie though. Nor do I think it's the scariest thing the creators of ALIEN came up with for that movie.

It may just be me, but the original comment just comes off as smug rather than trying to honestly add observations.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Indeed. "Oh males thinking childbirth is horrific lel!"

[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I mean for 1979? A lot of males probably DID think it was horrific. I don’t think males were allowed in the delivery room UNTIL the 70s, and choosing to actually exercise the option became more common in the late 90s/2000s.

I think your comment really dismisses the fact that Alien feels like a modern movie in a lot of ways BECAUSE of these types of deliberate choices made during the writing and filming. The movie is over 40 years old.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Alien is one of my favorite movies ever, so I'm not dismissing anything.

I was responding to OP who observed that the comment about childbirth in the post felt dismissive, and I summarized it to make fun of it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I really wish I saw alien before it became a cultural phenomenon. Everything was spoiled the second I knew the movie existed.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I read the graphic novel (published by Heavy Metal magazine) long before I saw the movie and it was great.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Horik@artemis.camp 24 points 1 year ago

Well, now I love this movie even more.

Time for a rewatch.

[–] F_Haxhausen@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Reproduction has always been horror. Life IS body horror: sex, childbearing, puberty, eating, aging, the micro-biome, the human virome. All very pretty disgusting when we pay attention.

Human DNA is 8-10% virus DNA. And there are 39 trillion bacterias, of about 10,000 species, virions outnumber them 10 to 1 in the human body. Viruses infect bacteria inside us. Then there is the Mycobiome. And while the amount of fungus in the human body is comparably low, certain sites are rather high. Like the ear for example. Do not read the “Human” section on the Mycobiome on Wikipedia.

[–] brewbellyblueberry@sopuli.xyz 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dang I thought the whole "vaginas mouth raping people" of facehuggers and all the sexual horror stuff and all that was just an H. R. Giger thing. All this just made one of my all time favorite movies even better.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Turns out it was the director telling Giger to go nuts.

[–] Kleinbonum@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago

Not sure how much more encouragement H.R. needed, given that his work from the 1960s was already pretty nuts, but he certainly didn't hold back for the movies!

[–] daltotron@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

so, the horror of alien is just mpreg? isn't that also the horror of "junior"?

that explains a lot of what I feel about the alien

[–] mriormro@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No, that's one of the horrors of ALIEN. Another is a seemingly unstoppable force of nature with no discernable motivation beyond killing and reproducing. As well as the terror of extreme isolation in unknowable lands. There's a lot to get scared by.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Don't forget the acid blood.

[–] thawed_caveman@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

It is the horror of Junior though.

[–] Shou@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

More rape and forced birth than just mpreg

[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Image Transcription: Tumblr


funnytwittertweets

A screenshot of a Twitter tweet by Olivia Campbell (@liviecampbell) stating

I mean, the SCARIEST thing the men who wrote ALIEN (1979) could think of was a living thing taking up residence in your torso then bursting out of you.


wahbegan

i mean i know you're taking the piss, but Dan O'Bannon has talked at length about how he did very much deliberately write the movie to attack a male character in a way that invoked oral rape and violent childbirth because he wanted the film to create sexual anxiety and fear in the men in the audience, which he felt was an untapped potential in horror


tempest-of-set

"Dan O'Bannon specifically wrote this scene with the male's fear of penetration in mind and wanted the scene to operate as a payback of sorts for all of the times horror films have subjected weak women to male predatory monsters. His goal was to reverse the stigma associated with the sexualized violence against women in horror and turn the idea back on itself. It's no coincidence that the chestburster's birth involves a forceful invasion of male bodied victims and concludes with a phallic entity being born out of a male's chest."


[–] Emerald@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What the fuck did I just type

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

Words for the visually impaired. Thank you for your service.

[–] nyar@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Would recommend reading Men, Women, and Chainsaws.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is one of the movies that made me super thankful for the fact that I intentionally go into movies with as little information as possible.

I got so sick of trailers leaving me with virtually all major plot points and locales. Now I just check ratings and occasionally the genre before watching.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

I get it. The Xenomorph's head kinda looks like a dick. Giger is a perve yada yada yada.

But jeez. I am honestly so tired of reading about how phallic the Xenomorph is. They're beautiful hungry guys, and they've been done so dirty by time and freshman film studies essays.

load more comments
view more: next ›