Have they tried removing more women's rights?
this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
122 points (96.2% liked)
politics
18904 readers
3051 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Maybe they should attack trans people more and ban even more books!
Just ban all books. Checkmade [sic] nerds.
Isn’t this their goal? An uneducated populace is easier to control
It's almost like you and I can tell the future!
Or how about blatantly ignoring the will of the people because sky daddy said so?
Sky daddy never said these things because
- He doesn't exist
- All words "said" by sky daddy were written by racist and misogynist centuries after words were "said"
- Sky daddy's ultimate philosophy, is follow the golden rule.
They could also try funding the cops with a marijuana tax as revenge for it being legalized despite home grow being legalized too
"We've tried nothing, and we're out of ideas!"
Sorry, someone had to say it. But seriously, they don't even stand for anything. Everything is just culture-war bullshit and blaming Democrats for imagined evils, they have no desire or ability to actually lead. They can't even *fund the government or elect their own Speaker...
It's so clear that the GOP is flailing. They've only won a single presidential popular vote since 1988. Old white people are dying and brown kids are reaching voting age. Young people at large are overwhelmingly fed up with the GOP. They are losing the demographics game big time, and I think they know it.
And I think the GOP base knows it deep down, too, and I think Obama was really emblematic of it. Suddenly, they had to wake up to a country that was rapidly shifting, a black man was president, gay people were getting rights and becoming broadly accepted in society, people were starting to talk about racism as an actual problem again, movies and advertising were getting more diversity, trans people were getting rights... And I think this deeply unsettled a significant chunk of the population who felt like their control over America was waning, hence the Tea Party, hence the MAGA movement.
This fascistic movement we're seeing from the GOP isn't logical at all. It's losing them elections left and right, but if they don't pursue this, they lose all their primaries, because this movement is about the Republican base lashing out over them losing demographically.
The GOP is in a rough spot right now. Their whole thing for the past 40 years was about fighting boogymen to court the evangelical and fundamentalist sects, while relying on votes from the moderates who like the economic or foreign policy.
Then Obama proved the impossible by being a largely successful presidentwhile scandalously having a darker skin tone. From there, the party's culture shifted right and they started actually trying to change things that should've stayed as punching bags.
"Look, we're fighting for the rights of unborn children here but the evil leftists have too much support. You better keep voting for us or it's going to get worse"
A phrase like that will hook the far right into voting for you, and the moderates will basically ignore it and continue to vote for you because they want to keep immigration to a minimum or keep taxes where they are.
Now that the GOP started actually pushing for sweeping social change, the far right got a taste of blood and are screaming for more while the moderates are starting to look to the dems as they're now far more likely to keep things normal.
Mostly they're just neoliberals. They're in it for the pay, pension, insider trading and open bribes. The only thing they're interested in "leading" is other pigs to the trough.
But as a means to that end, they've spent decades pandering to every form of bigotry and idiocy they could wring a vote from and now it's starting to consume them from the inside out.
They're not worth any sympathy though. If their fascist faction started dragging black people from their homes and executing them, they'd only be upset that they couldn't use them as slaves to maximise profits.
Hey - hey member that time after Obama won when the republicans got all concerned and made a super serious report about what was wrong with them? Member? And the report said they should be less hateful to Latinos and other people? And the next thing they did was quadruple down on hating everyone who wasn’t them? Member that?
That was awesome.
I member!
Growth & Opportunity Project https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Growth_%26_Opportunity_Project "the perception that the GOP does not care about people is doing great harm to the Party and its candidates on the federal level, especially in presidential years."
"emphasizing the increasing Hispanic population in the United States and urging the party to limit its rhetoric on immigration policy. It also recommended appealing to younger voters by reducing social conservatism in the party."
"The report emphasized the importance of appealing to African-American, Latino, Asian, women, gay, and young voters"
Yeah, about that...
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Ohio was a similar story: The “Yes” vote on Issue 1, which protects reproductive rights, saw its biggest support come from major urban centers and their suburbs, where it performed better than the Democratic Senate nominee in last year’s elections.
It’s a trend that’s been largely true since the dawn of the Trump era: Republicans have been consistently struggling to perform as well as they once did in the suburbs, giving Democrats an opening to persuade and turn out voters that are crucial to winning statewide races in battleground states.
There, Republicans performed well in local elections that largely centered on crime and migration concerns in the city and where abortion wasn’t a major issue, showing just how hard it is to disentangle the polarizing effect of the GOP’s anti-abortion rights brand in states where those protections are at risk.
And the suburban shift contributed much of the margin of support that buoyed Joe Biden to victory in battleground states in 2020 and helped Democratic candidates win in close midterm elections last year.
“In conjunction with abortion is the other layered-in kind of Republican social agenda that is just so repellent to the country,” a Democratic campaigner in suburban Bucks County told the Philadelphia Inquirer.
That general brand of MAGA Republicanism — socially conservative extremists who threaten basic freedoms — was toxic in swing suburban counties during last year’s midterms especially, and Democratic candidates from Nevada and Arizona to Georgia and Wisconsin seized on that messaging and were largely successful.
The original article contains 1,470 words, the summary contains 250 words. Saved 83%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
“The driving force of our politics since 2018 has been fear and opposition to MAGA,” longtime Democratic strategist Simon Rosenberg told The Atlantic’s Ronald Brownstein after Tuesday’s results.
Yeah. Precisely. Dems aren't offering anything other than, "look out, MAGA bad!"
We need more progressives and we aren't getting that.