this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
249 points (98.1% liked)

Gaming

19991 readers
96 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HipsterTenZero@dormi.zone 87 points 1 year ago (1 children)

just shove a 4090 and a forklift battery in there, ez

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

But then you'd need to get forklift certified to operate the thing

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] onion@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago

Damn fella, save some ussy for the rest of us!

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 81 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is a good thing. We all know valve can't count to 3, so the 2 will be the last one

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wouldn't it be Steam Deck 2 Episode 2?

[–] uis@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Steam Deck 2 rc 2

[–] Dalek_Thal@aussie.zone 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Cool, does this mean they'll actually fucking sell the thing in Australia, or is it just forever going to be dodgy resellers?

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The technology to ship this to Australia just doesn't exist yet.

[–] And009@reddthat.com 8 points 1 year ago

They even need a upside down type c cable

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 17 points 1 year ago

🎵dream on🎵dream on🎵dream on🎵dream on🎵

[–] dewritoninja@pawb.social 13 points 1 year ago

Welcome to the south American experience

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

Imagine Valve going the Apple route: "Fuck it, we will design our own hardware to suit our needs" and making hardware tailored to linux.

Edit: what about qualcomm's new ARM: Snapdragon X Elite?

[–] gornius@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I think ARM is their end goal, it's really the only option for a handheld console, as today ARM is the only way you'll get enough performance/power rate to make it both good on battery with good enough performance.

Win-win for everyone if they invest in an open source x86 to ARM project, similar like they did with Wine.

[–] kadu@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The Switch is more than proof enough that pretty much any modern game engine can compile to an ARM target with zero issues (though Nvidia's low level APIs help, not sure about Qualcomm).

But there's zero chance older PC games would ever be updated, and by older I don't mean ancient, some AAA studios stop issuing updates in about one year after release.

So it all comes down to being able to emulate X86 on ARM... The best example we have is Apple, and games run but with a massive performance hit. Microsoft's implementation is borderline unusable. I'm not sure what to expect from Valve.

[–] Dani551@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago

Checkout Box86/64 and Fex-Emu. They both do x86 translation/emulation on ARM Linux and the results are wayy better than any reasonable expectations I had going in.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] uis@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Every year they are more likely to go RISC-V.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Nah ARM is barely more efficient than X86. As soon as AMD went TSMC 3nm they got almost similar power efficiency. As the Apple M chips.

Apples "magic sauce" is just being the first one on the new TSMC nodes.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] uis@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

and making hardware tailored to linux.

They already did it.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They didn't. They asked AMD to do it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Back then, we really couldn't engage with a display manufacturer to do exactly what we were after because they didn't really understand the product category, or who would be buying the screen, or why it would matter. Now that picture has changed and we're able to get custom work done.

Why would literally any of those questions be of concern to the screen manufacturer? And I don't understand, did Valve begin work on this in 1918? How could anyone not understand the product category?

[–] Chobbes@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Display manufacturers may understand what Valve might want in a screen, but they might not understand how many units of a screen of such a specification they would be able to sell — is it going to be a custom job for just a few thousand of valve’s experimental console (which may have different degrees of success), or is it going to be something that they can sell to more people and a wider audience.

[–] And009@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago

Understanding a product and having practical knowledge about building a speciality part are different ball games

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Powerglove style controllers with a holographic screen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I wonder if the technology they're waiting for is a more powerful arm processor?

[–] datendefekt@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Highly doubt it, because pretty much all games are compiled for x86, and would require dynamic recompilation, which I'm turn costs performance.

Or... they could perform the recompilation beforehand just like the precompiled shaders. Hmmm.. that would make it pretty viable!

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it's well in valves wheelhouse after proton to do something similar and revolutionise x86 to ARM translation. But at the moment better chips still need to arrive for that too be good enough for a product to built around. Which is why it's the first thing i think of when they say they need technology to advance more before they make a new steam deck.

[–] Chobbes@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

x86 to ARM translation is a fairly different problem than what proton solves, so I don’t think it’s clearly in their wheelhouse. Proton / wine is mostly just an implementation of windows libraries on Linux, but doing efficient x86 emulation on arm is a compiler problem. I would guess that Valve could do it or at least hire people to do it, but it’s a bit of a different skill set. Doing x86 efficiently on ARM (particularly with concurrency) also likely involves some extensions to ARM like Apple does with their chips. I haven’t heard if the snapdragon elite chips have anything for x86 compatibility baked in at all. Frankly, I’m treating the snapdragon elite with a fair degree of scepticism until you can actually buy the thing, but I hope it’s good!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] antihumanitarian@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Architecture emulation for current gen games is exceptionally unlikely right now. At a fundamental level, wine/proton doesn't change the instructions the code describes, rather it translates the input and output. It's a reimplementation of the same instructions in Windows. For architecture crossing you'd either have to create virtual hardware, which adds tremendous overhead, or recompile the binary. Recompilation is theoretically possible, but for x86_64 to ARM64, for games no less, it's beyond the realm of mortals. It's like how some jokes can't be translated between languages; the structure and vocabulary is just too different.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] regbin_@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does Steam Deck support VRR on its built-in display?

[–] Lesrid@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

No it does not. It has HDR though and a 90Hz refresh rate.

load more comments
view more: next ›