this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2023
229 points (97.1% liked)

politics

19088 readers
3750 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 50 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm not sure if being thrown in jail would be good politically for Trump or not. However, I see no reason not to find out.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mein Kampf was dictated to Rudolph Hess in Landsberg Prison.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Hitler was in his mid-30s even he was in prison, though. Trump seems to be modeling his political career after him, 40 years too late.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He's going a little out of order, and moving a lot faster than Hitler did. I'd say he's averaging about 25 years behind. Which means his eventual suicide should be in about 4 years.

[–] KnowledgeableNip@leminal.space 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If he eats enough adderall and McDonalds that his heart stops, does that count?

I mean, I’ll take it.

[–] uis@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Back then war(and dictatorship) was a matter of young. Now it is a matter of old.

[–] guacupado@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

The problem is that Trump will never be thrown in jail as we know it. He'll go to jail and he'll look tougher for it even though his stay would have been like a Motel 6.

[–] PeleSpirit@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This explains a lot. They also don't think he'll actually go to jail.

The ex-president’s legal advisers had long ago told Trump that his chances of winning at trial are close to zero — hence, their scorched-earth, “Fyre Festival”-style courtroom performances. According to the three sources, several Trump attorneys and other key allies have advised him that the more the New York judge supposedly “overreacts” — including perhaps remanding Trump — the better their case for an appeal will be.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

The liability is what else comes out of happens as a function of this trial. It can materially impact his other trials.

[–] SuperIce@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't threaten me with a good time

[–] Attack0fthenerd@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

"Celebrity Lawyer" Dershowitz? Dafuq. That's like towing the line of journalistic malpractice. He defended Epstein, Weinstein, OJ Simpson and the subject of the fucking article Trump. I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. Can't wait for Rolling Stones Humanitarian edition for Kissinger

[–] paintbucketholder@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

More like "Celebrity" Lawyer Dershowitz. As in: everybody knows his name, he's a celebrity - for defending the most deplorable people who have ever faced trial.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Monday's going to be fun... But keep in mind, it's not televised, so we'll have to wait for breaks and EOD for the full story.

[–] NVariable@startrek.website 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Contempt of court that arises during a trial has zero effect on the outcome. A judge can throw you in jail for violating decorum, much less violating an order.

Trump’s legal team needs to watch My Cousin Vinny again.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah id love to see the shocked Pikachu face on the attorney who told him he wouldn't sit in jail at all as the bailiffs haul Trump's ass out of court.

[–] Feirdro@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It is the liberal democracy’s attack on the ideologue that clinches his victory. But we also have no choice but to try to hold him to account. It’s an ancient dance and we’re locked into it. I see no way out.

times are about to get a whole lot darker.

[–] waratchess@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

What are you going to do, throw me in jail?

  • jailed man
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


As Donald Trump prepares to take the stand in the civil fraud trial that could destroy his business empire, the ex-president and his attorneys have settled on a strategy built on spite and unbridled antagonism.

The ex-president’s legal advisers had long ago told Trump that his chances of winning at trial are close to zero — hence, their scorched-earth, “Fyre Festival”-style courtroom performances.

In recent weeks, the former president and some of his lawyers in the New York civil fraud trial have discussed the likelihood of Judge Arthur Engoron very aggressively responding to Trump team’s strategy of relentless hostility and defiance.

The tactics have included attacks on Engoron’s court clerk, filibustering the prosecution’s witnesses with repetitive questions, and raising legal arguments the judge had already specifically prohibited.

On Friday, Chris Kise, Trump’s lead attorney in the case, appeared to test the judge’s patience by once again by attacking his court clerk, Allison Greenfield, with claims about her “excessive political donations” from a Wisconsin man who describes himself as “Applying the 69th Amendment to the Internet!” in his Twitter bio.

Fredin’s attacks had previously helped to land Trump in trouble with Judge Engoron when he posted a screenshot from the man’s Twitter’ account insulting Greenfield on his Truth Social platform.


The original article contains 1,132 words, the summary contains 209 words. Saved 82%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

He's shooting for a mistrial. Regardless, we can try the jail thing. No cell phone while he's in either.