this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
2381 points (98.4% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9736 readers
1003 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] yote_zip@pawb.social 319 points 1 year ago (9 children)

"If you don't wear Special Clothes around me I'm going to lose it."

When are we going to move past costuming for work?

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 91 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The only costume I wanna wear for work is a mascot costume for a sports team that named themselves after an animal.

[–] TurboDiesel@lemmy.world 87 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's ok to admit you're a furry on the Internet. We run the damn thing, after all

[–] Fal@yiffit.net 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Look at the instance that user is from

[–] Jimbo@yiffit.net 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This comment chain is a yiffit party

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] clearedtoland@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago

Nonsense ideology that dates back to medieval times. I subscribed to it for years until I realized it had no bearing on my work. I tell my interns and staff “dress appropriately,” meaning be comfortable - unless we’re meeting with clients, whose expectations may not align.

[–] rwhitisissle@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Dress codes serve as class signifiers. Like most rules of decorum, they're cultural artifacts used to delineate the haves from the have-nots. They don't dislike the fact that Fetterman refuses to wear a suit. They dislike the fact that he dresses like the common people he actually represents. Whereas they dress like the people they represent - capitalist oligarchs. They're wanting to close ranks and keep people from realizing that not everyone in the senate serves the same masters.

[–] eezeebee@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 year ago

People with their little collars and jackets and ties to make them feel important

[–] PlatinumSf@pawb.social 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn't the logic that it's an easy thing to use as a sign of conformance? A check to see if you're willing to compromise your personal choices for the groups mandate?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] STRIKINGdebate2@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Probably never. People will always judge others based on how they are dressed. We subconsciously attach a certain image of what people should look like. And these dress codes are often enforced by society indirectly. 99% of people would not want to have a lawyer dressed casually to court and will pick someone else even if the alternative is by all accounts not as good as the casually dressed lawyer.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

I'd be happy to have a lawyer in casual attire if it wouldn't bias the judge and jury against him (or me).

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thats right. I judge them by how they are dressed. Fetterman is a working class american, and the others are my enemy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 year ago

My knee jerk reaction to seeing anyone in a suit is "Asshole".

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Squirrel@thelemmy.club 129 points 1 year ago (8 children)

You see, this impacts them. Never mind that there's no actual impact, they only want those among them who behave as expected. Also, he got excessive attention due to his attire, which gave him a bigger audience for his political views.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So youre saying that things need to impact these people?

[–] zakobjoa@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Only very small things though. A few millimetres at most.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Do you think about 5.56 milimeters would be enough, or should we splurge on 7.62 milimeters?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 129 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Once the Miserables found themselves outvoted in the Estates General of 1789 by about 3% of the population (the ones with money), it became very uncomfortable in France for aristocrats.

Just saying,

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cricket97@lemmy.world 78 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Would love to see some bipartisan support for banning congress members from trading stocks. Both sides are doing it to such a degree that they are more likely to be replaced before any legislation regarding this gets passed. Obligatory Nancy Pelosi Stock Tracker link: https://twitter.com/PelosiTracker_/

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 54 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Formal dress codes are upper class by aesthetics. Its just another little bite of compliance that one is expected to take before joining those in power.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 year ago

It is funny and sad how many ways of getting ahead in society can be interpreted as testing your tolerance for bullshit.

[–] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Okay. All those fat old men (on both sides) wearing ill fitting suits should be expelled from houses of government until they wear a fitted suit. Same with the women.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

Their priorities are “fuck you got mine”

[–] m3t00@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (4 children)

need a retirement age for all public employees. I mean let them get paid to do nothing where we don't have to listen to them pretending to do serious stuff.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Pixlbabble@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean they kinda always had it out for hoodies.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago

Ever since that one congressman wore one to protest the treatment of black kids by the police for wearing them.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They put up a dress code, then one of their own rocks up wearing denim dungarees.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fuck that.

Denim three piece suit

[–] rwhitisissle@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That dude looks like he exclusively fucks other people's wives and husbands.

Based.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 year ago (4 children)

And where is the public uproar about this? I only hear crickets.

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

There are laws against insider trading not only in general but also specifically for Congressmen. Also, there have been (failed) bills to raise the federal minimum wage, including an attempt to add it into the stimulus bill in 2021 as a $15 Minimum Wage.

People like to ask "WhY iS noBOdY DoInG SoMEtHInG?!" while completely ignoring that one party consistently is trying but we never give them enough seats in the senate to actually do it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] the_q@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You wanna know why freedom of speech and freedom of assembly are legal and encouraged? Because it does nothing. The American revolution wasn't a sit-in.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And where is the public uproar about this?

We've had crowds in the street protesting social injustice practically every year since the Seattle WTO riots of the 1990s. If you haven't seen a public outcry, you haven't been paying attention.

The problem is that the outcries are fractured, the movements regularly subverted by a combination of con-artists and police, and a lot of the mass media ideology poisons people against one another by ethnicity, religion, gender, and locale. Folks who can all agree that the Sacklers deserve a long drop from a short rope will scream invective at one another because one of them showed up wearing a BLM t-shirt and the other finds it offensive. Folks who all agree de-industrialization was a nightmare for the midwest will tear each others eyes out over the abortion debate.

That's even before you get to the intense bombardment of mass media, fixating on everything from Ukraine to Crime Wave to razor blades in candy to whatever the hotbutton gaff of the evening happens to be.

I don't think anyone is hearing crickets. More that we're trying to hear a finely tuned orchestra under the sound of exploding bombs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] popcap200@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn't insider trading literally illegal tho?

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 year ago

Not if you're a member of Congress.

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

any publicity is good publicity and maybe he can use this platform to get his messages across

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago
[–] EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Actually George W Bush was the last person to raise the minimum wage. That's the second Bush for anyone who might not know.

Obama did nothing with it.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›