this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
2378 points (98.4% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9550 readers
249 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] yote_zip@pawb.social 319 points 10 months ago (9 children)

"If you don't wear Special Clothes around me I'm going to lose it."

When are we going to move past costuming for work?

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 90 points 10 months ago (4 children)

The only costume I wanna wear for work is a mascot costume for a sports team that named themselves after an animal.

[–] TurboDiesel@lemmy.world 87 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It's ok to admit you're a furry on the Internet. We run the damn thing, after all

[–] Fal@yiffit.net 31 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Look at the instance that user is from

[–] Jimbo@yiffit.net 19 points 10 months ago (3 children)

This comment chain is a yiffit party

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] clearedtoland@lemmy.world 52 points 10 months ago

Nonsense ideology that dates back to medieval times. I subscribed to it for years until I realized it had no bearing on my work. I tell my interns and staff “dress appropriately,” meaning be comfortable - unless we’re meeting with clients, whose expectations may not align.

[–] rwhitisissle@lemmy.world 44 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Dress codes serve as class signifiers. Like most rules of decorum, they're cultural artifacts used to delineate the haves from the have-nots. They don't dislike the fact that Fetterman refuses to wear a suit. They dislike the fact that he dresses like the common people he actually represents. Whereas they dress like the people they represent - capitalist oligarchs. They're wanting to close ranks and keep people from realizing that not everyone in the senate serves the same masters.

[–] eezeebee@lemmy.ca 27 points 10 months ago

People with their little collars and jackets and ties to make them feel important

[–] PlatinumSf@pawb.social 24 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Isn't the logic that it's an easy thing to use as a sign of conformance? A check to see if you're willing to compromise your personal choices for the groups mandate?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] STRIKINGdebate2@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Probably never. People will always judge others based on how they are dressed. We subconsciously attach a certain image of what people should look like. And these dress codes are often enforced by society indirectly. 99% of people would not want to have a lawyer dressed casually to court and will pick someone else even if the alternative is by all accounts not as good as the casually dressed lawyer.

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (8 children)

I'd be happy to have a lawyer in casual attire if it wouldn't bias the judge and jury against him (or me).

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Thats right. I judge them by how they are dressed. Fetterman is a working class american, and the others are my enemy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 13 points 10 months ago

My knee jerk reaction to seeing anyone in a suit is "Asshole".

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Squirrel@thelemmy.club 129 points 10 months ago (8 children)

You see, this impacts them. Never mind that there's no actual impact, they only want those among them who behave as expected. Also, he got excessive attention due to his attire, which gave him a bigger audience for his political views.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 42 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So youre saying that things need to impact these people?

[–] zakobjoa@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Only very small things though. A few millimetres at most.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Do you think about 5.56 milimeters would be enough, or should we splurge on 7.62 milimeters?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 128 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Once the Miserables found themselves outvoted in the Estates General of 1789 by about 3% of the population (the ones with money), it became very uncomfortable in France for aristocrats.

Just saying,

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] cricket97@lemmy.world 77 points 10 months ago (7 children)

Would love to see some bipartisan support for banning congress members from trading stocks. Both sides are doing it to such a degree that they are more likely to be replaced before any legislation regarding this gets passed. Obligatory Nancy Pelosi Stock Tracker link: https://twitter.com/PelosiTracker_/

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 54 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Formal dress codes are upper class by aesthetics. Its just another little bite of compliance that one is expected to take before joining those in power.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 35 points 10 months ago

It is funny and sad how many ways of getting ahead in society can be interpreted as testing your tolerance for bullshit.

[–] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 49 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Okay. All those fat old men (on both sides) wearing ill fitting suits should be expelled from houses of government until they wear a fitted suit. Same with the women.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 44 points 10 months ago

Their priorities are “fuck you got mine”

[–] m3t00@lemmy.world 39 points 10 months ago (4 children)

need a retirement age for all public employees. I mean let them get paid to do nothing where we don't have to listen to them pretending to do serious stuff.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Pixlbabble@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I mean they kinda always had it out for hoodies.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 26 points 10 months ago

Ever since that one congressman wore one to protest the treatment of black kids by the police for wearing them.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They put up a dress code, then one of their own rocks up wearing denim dungarees.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Fuck that.

Denim three piece suit

[–] rwhitisissle@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That dude looks like he exclusively fucks other people's wives and husbands.

Based.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 23 points 10 months ago (4 children)

And where is the public uproar about this? I only hear crickets.

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

There are laws against insider trading not only in general but also specifically for Congressmen. Also, there have been (failed) bills to raise the federal minimum wage, including an attempt to add it into the stimulus bill in 2021 as a $15 Minimum Wage.

People like to ask "WhY iS noBOdY DoInG SoMEtHInG?!" while completely ignoring that one party consistently is trying but we never give them enough seats in the senate to actually do it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] the_q@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

You wanna know why freedom of speech and freedom of assembly are legal and encouraged? Because it does nothing. The American revolution wasn't a sit-in.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

And where is the public uproar about this?

We've had crowds in the street protesting social injustice practically every year since the Seattle WTO riots of the 1990s. If you haven't seen a public outcry, you haven't been paying attention.

The problem is that the outcries are fractured, the movements regularly subverted by a combination of con-artists and police, and a lot of the mass media ideology poisons people against one another by ethnicity, religion, gender, and locale. Folks who can all agree that the Sacklers deserve a long drop from a short rope will scream invective at one another because one of them showed up wearing a BLM t-shirt and the other finds it offensive. Folks who all agree de-industrialization was a nightmare for the midwest will tear each others eyes out over the abortion debate.

That's even before you get to the intense bombardment of mass media, fixating on everything from Ukraine to Crime Wave to razor blades in candy to whatever the hotbutton gaff of the evening happens to be.

I don't think anyone is hearing crickets. More that we're trying to hear a finely tuned orchestra under the sound of exploding bombs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] popcap200@lemmy.ml 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Isn't insider trading literally illegal tho?

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 26 points 10 months ago

Not if you're a member of Congress.

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

any publicity is good publicity and maybe he can use this platform to get his messages across

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago
[–] EmperorHenry@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 10 months ago (12 children)

Actually George W Bush was the last person to raise the minimum wage. That's the second Bush for anyone who might not know.

Obama did nothing with it.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›