this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
27 points (100.0% liked)

Beehaw Support

2803 readers
1 users here now

Support and meta community for Beehaw. Ask your questions about the community, technical issues, and other such things here.

A brief FAQ for lurkers and new users can be found here.

Our September 2024 financial update is here.

For a refresher on our philosophy, see also What is Beehaw?, The spirit of the rules, and Beehaw is a Community


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.


if you can see this, it's up  

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

hey folks, we'll be quick and to the point with this one:

we have made the decision to defederate from lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works. we recognize this is hugely inconvenient for a wide variety of reasons, but we think this is a decision we need to take immediately. the remainder of the post details our thoughts and decision-making on why this is necessary.

we have been concerned with how sustainable the explosion of new users on Lemmy is--particularly with federation in mind--basically since it began. i have already related how difficult dealing with the explosion has been just constrained to this instance for us four Admins, and increasingly we're being confronted with external vectors we have to deal with that have further stressed our capabilities (elaborated on below).

an unfortunate reality we've also found is we just don't have the tools or the time here to parse out all the good from all the bad. all we have is a nuke and some pretty rudimentary mod powers that don't scale well. we have a list of improvements we'd like to see both on the moderation side of Lemmy and federation if at all possible--but we're unanimous in the belief that we can't wait on what we want to be developed here. separately, we want to do this now, while the band-aid can be ripped off with substantially less pain.

aside from/complementary to what's mentioned above, our reason for defederating, by and large, boils down to:

  • these two instances' open registration policy, which is extremely problematic for us given how federation works and how trivial it makes trolling, harassment, and other undesirable behavior;
  • the disproportionate number of moderator actions we take against users of these two instances, and the general amount of time we have to dedicate to bad actors on those two instances;
  • our need to preserve not only a moderated community but a vibe and general feeling this is actually a safe space for our users to participate in;
  • and the reality that fulfilling our ethos is simply not possible when we not only have to account for our own users but have to account for literally tens of thousands of new, completely unvetted users, some of whom explicitly see spaces like this as desirable to troll and disrupt and others of whom simply don't care about what our instance stands for

as Gaywallet puts it, in our discussion of whether to do this:

There's a lot of soft moderating that happens, where people step in to diffuse tense situations. But it's not just that, there's a vibe that comes along with it. Most people need a lot of trust and support to open up, and it's really hard to trust and support who's around you when there are bad actors. People shut themselves off in various ways when there's more hostility around them. They'll even shut themselves off when there's fake nice behavior around. There's a lot of nuance in modding a community like this and it's not just where we take moderator actions- sometimes people need to step in to diffuse, to negotiate, to help people grow. This only works when everyone is on the same page about our ethos and right now we can't even assess that for people who aren't from our instance, so we're walking a tightrope by trying to give everyone the benefit of the doubt. That isn't sustainable forever and especially not in the face of massive growth on such a short timeframe.

Explicitly safe spaces in real life typically aren't open to having strangers walk in off the street, even if they have a bouncer to throw problematic people out. A single negative interaction might require a lot of energy to undo.

and, to reiterate: we understand that a lot of people legitimately and fairly use these instances, and this is going to be painful while it's in effect. but we hope you can understand why we're doing this. our words, when we talk about building something better here, are not idle platitudes, and we are not out to build a space that grows at any cost. we want a better space, and we think this is necessary to do that right now. if you disagree we understand that, but we hope you can if nothing else come away with the understanding it was an informed decision.

this is also not a permanent judgement (or a moral one on the part of either community's owner, i should add--we just have differing interests here and that's fine). in the future as tools develop, cultures settle, attitudes and interest change, and the wave of newcomers settles down, we'll reassess whether we feel capable of refederating with these communities.

thanks for using our site folks.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] projectazar@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

This is going to be a learning process I think for a lot of people. Not just on federation, but on community building as well. You all seem to be trying to build something here, and I am willing to be patient and participate while it grows. If we get down the road and it just isn't working, I have faith that there will be open discussion on how to make this community grow while maintaining its ethos and we'll be here to figure out what is best for each of us individually.

Good on you for taking decisive action at these early stages while we figure out what we want, where we want to go, and how we want to get there on this relatively new platform.

[–] lwaxana_katana@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I agree, at first my knee-jerk reaction was against defederation, but I think actually this is one of the cool things about Lemmy and the way it works; you can have relatively isolated pockets and very open spaces, and users can move between them freely. It's not like leaving Reddit and coming to Lemmy, for example. You can use Beehaw and other instances, and both can serve a specific purpose. I really appreciate this write up because without it I would not have felt good about this decision, but after having read it I get it and I appreciate it.

[–] thebestlettuce@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

users can move between them freely

but.. they really cant though can they? atm, every community on beehaw just lost a massive chunk of their userbase, and they can't even move to a diff instance. Masto allows you to automatically move your followers to a new account on a new instance, but there just isn't that option on Lemmy

[–] JohannesOliver@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Who is “they”? The users, or the communities? Beehaw creates the communities, that’s why there are relatively few, so I don’t see that Beehaw communities would have much reason to move anyway. Beehaw has no create community button.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ghostalmedia@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Can someone explain like I’m 5 for the new folks here what this means in terms of the user experience?

What are the restrictions around viewing and commenting on posts?

Does this impact, for example, beehaw to lemmy.world the same way as lemmy.world to beehaw?

What mod tools would beehaw need to remain federated?

[–] nihilx7E3@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Can someone explain like I’m 5 for the new folks here what this means in terms of the user experience?

lemmy.world & sh.itjust.works are two huge (well, compared to many other lemmy instances) communities, so this effectively means being cut off from part of the lemmy fediverse.

What are the restrictions around viewing and commenting on posts?

the servers won't be allowed to federate with us anymore. federation is the term for when an instance downloads posts, comments, profiles, upvotes, etc from another. this change means we simply won't see posts & comments from those instances at all.

Does this impact, for example, beehaw to lemmy.world the same way as lemmy.world to beehaw?

~~not sure, but if i had to guess i'd say probably not, unless they also defederate. i'll log into my lemmy.world backup account & test.~~

EDIT: seems to affect them just the same actually, i can't see any new posts or comments. i thought it'd only block them from posting but seems like it's a total severance.

What mod tools would beehaw need to remain federated?

the admins & mods here can answer this much better than me, but from the post it seems like it's more a problem of size & numbers than something a mod tool can solve.

[–] realChem@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Defederation completely cuts the ties between instances, so no connection in either direction: lemmy.world users can't post here (which is why this was done), and beehaw users can't post there. The latter is less than ideal, but it's the only lever of control lemmy has at this point for inter-instance relations. Hopefully things will change as better tooling / more granular controls are implemented.

[–] Wigglet@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think the mods want kind of a one way gate so since beehaw has more restrictions, beehaw users could venture out unhindered but the lemmy world users wouldn't be able to post or comment here unrestricted. I dont know what will be possible but it would be nice to have some sort of whitelist where posters from other instances could be white listed. With no entry requirements, the two instances removed are really easy for trolls to create as many accounts as they would like to harass.

[–] GhostMagician@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

One way gate with at least an approval process would be good, since if someone can put in an application to make an account on beehaw then why can't the same thing be offered the users from lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works without them having to make a beehaw account one the tools are in place?

And why even block them off from seeing content and vice versa. You don't even have to be logged in to see what is on beehaw, so why suddenly so restrictive from non lurkers. I really want a subscription feed that is reliable like reddit was and not so vulnerable to the defederation when it comes to at least having my subscribed feed populated with new content.

Sure control who can actually comment or whatever, but at least I'd like to be able to see.

[–] delmain@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

Technically they still can view anything on beehaw in read-only mode by just going directly to beehaw, the same way a completely logged-out user does, that's not blocked.

What's blocked is just their ability to go to their own logged-in dashboard and click "all" and see beehaw posts

[–] TheiaTheMoonMaker@beehaw.org 1 points 2 years ago

Just a heads up so you can try to plan ahead: on Reddit one of the tactics used by those with hateful agendas was to shut down progressive threads by purposely creating drama in that thread to overwhelm the moderators so that they had to lock the thread thus stopping all discussion. Sometimes they did this by being awful and dragging in well meaning users into fights, other times I they’d drop a few “I’m just asking questions” comments focussing on hot-button ideas that they knew would rile up arguments. It was very deliberate tactic and one that I don’t think moderators ever figured out how to deal with effectively, because short of babysitting the thread with their full attention from start to finish there was no way to prevent entire threads from devolving into attacks and arguments.

The crazy thing was how effectively one or two people with hateful agendas could derail an entire comment section of well meaning people and, by getting the thread locked, shut down the discussion and spread of progressive ideas.

I bring this up because Beehaw is perhaps uniquely vulnerable to this sort of ‘attack’, and you should expect to see it in the future. By joining other federated instances and using these tactics to stir up drama in Beehaw threads they can, by forcing your hand to defederalize, restrict the access of those other communities to the progressive ideals and ideas posted on Beehaw. The end result is isolating progressive ideas inside our walled garden, while users of the rest of the Lemmy instances start to only see more right-wing extremist views, normalizing them to otherwise everyday people.

I don’t have a solution to this. But it’s something to be aware of in discussions with the moderators of other instances, that a handful of people with this exact agenda can make their community look bad in order to restrict their users’ access to progressive ideas.

[–] sverit@feddit.de 0 points 2 years ago

That's kinda sad, because it reinforces the clutter of decentralisation even more :(

[–] Username@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I am a moderator on the lemmy.world sailing community through my Beehaw acct. Will this affect that?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 21trillionsats@infosec.pub 0 points 2 years ago

I definitely do find this a little disappointing as I think the Lemmy community is too small at the moment to create unnecessary divides and schisms. Success in my mind is predicated on many communities from Reddit coming to servers and forming a common denominator community that achieves critical mass.

It’s clear to me that some of the communities on the 2 you are defederating from you instance have become more popular and are already the defacto “place to be” for certain subreddits.

All that said, I’m happy that my main server (infosec.pub) has not unfederated from those 2 instances so I am able to still participate on those 2 servers AND interact here on my “main” account. This lets me get the best of both worlds. It’s very exciting to see the Lemmy model working in that regard!

[–] jimrob4@midwest.social 0 points 2 years ago

New users: "I'm tired of Reddit telling me what I can't see! Top-down decision-making is ridiculous! I'm going to check out Lemmy!"

Beehaw: "Hold my beer and watch this."

[–] Hellebert@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Personally at least I had no expectations of your team moderating or otherwise being responsible for the content coming from those instances and thought it was enough to use the new icon set to clearly identify content from Beehaw vs the others.

It's a shame because such a move feels very anti-fediverse to me but I am new to the platform so take my opinion with a grain of salt.

[–] rs5th@lemmy.scottlabs.io 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think the larger issue was users from those external instances interacting with posts / comments in Beehaw’s communities. Since they’re open registration, bad actors could just create new accounts after being banned from Beehaw.

[–] Hellebert@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Isn't this always going to be a problem though? They can just go to other servers with open registration and do the same thing, the only way to avoid that is to never federate at all with the current tools available.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pixel@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So, not to be cold to this decision (because I totally understand that this didn't come lightly and don't want to "well ackshually" the mod team) but given I'm new to the fediverse as a concept, what does this mean for me as an end-user? Can I no longer engage with those communities at all? Or rather, what does defederating mean overall?

[–] fishy_2_0@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago

Defederating means that you as the user cannot interact or see comunities on those instances from this one and would need another account on a instance that is federated with them

[–] tookmyname@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

Seems a bit much. Get moderators.

[–] Master@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This is disappointing considering how popular some of the beehaw communities are (for instance beehaw.org/c/gaming) and now they have been completely ostracized from part of the lemmy community. Or at least the fastest growing part. (mostly because they have open registration). Personally I think this will only hurt the platform as a whole and fragment further, what is by nature, an already fragmented community.

I get why it is being done though. Especially with there being no verification for those servers. They become easy ways to make troll accounts.

Lemmy needs better federated mod tools to say the least (or so it appears to be). There has to be a better way to do this.

[–] simple@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Just wanted to put it out there that I ( simple@lemmy.world ) was one of the most active posters and commenters at gaming@beehaw.org . If this instance wanted to be closed off and heavily moderated it should have been clear at the start, a lot of people were relying on communities here and suddenly closing them off is going to harm Lemmy as a whole.

Seeing everyone in the comments pointing fingers and calling us toxic evil trolls is also ironically very toxic. This doesn't seem like the friendly community it's trying to be. Most of the content on this instance wasn't made by beehaw users. What a disappointing decision.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] anthoniix@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

Firstly, I want to say I appreciate your dedication to creating a well moderated and maintained community.

However, I feel like this is an overall bad decision.

Essentially what I'm thinking is, how is this sustainable?

The amount of control that youre trying to achieve here is going to create an increasingly small and insular community. Also, there is a serious risk of burn out on the moderation end if you're attempting to currate this much, the more this server grows the harder this is going to be to maintain.

With the type of platform that this is, we're going to have a wide variety of people. A lot of them are just going to be bad people. Simply defederating won't fix this, and it will also be a problem here even with manually approved sign ups.

If people want to, they will just lie to get in. Essentially your system right now relies on people not lying to you when they sign up. A targeted harassment campaign could easily overcome that.

What's next? Are we going to deferate kbin.social and mastodon.social? Why don't we just defederate every instance? Even the biggest social media platforms have a seriously hard time moderating content they actually don't want on their platform. You can literally find porn on Youtube.

Tipping your hand on the scales this much is really stressful for a small team, and often doesn't lead to the outcomes that you thought you wanted. I hope in the near future you refederate, but I understand if you don't.

[–] possiblylinux127@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This sucks as I am a member of many Lemmy.world subs

[–] davido@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago

Same, shitworks amd lemmyworld had some dank submissions. I lost around 6 communities so Ill make a new account there as I was already more active on their communities with this account.

I dont mind Beehaw doing this, its their own choice but I partly came here to see memes, and funny videos. Aka, get my scroll addiction fix.

I can understand they want a more mature community. I just dont feel like sharing if 50% of the fediverse cant even see or comment on it.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›