this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
470 points (97.6% liked)

politics

18894 readers
2974 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] spriteblood@kbin.social 156 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Updated headline:
Does violate gag order, justice system to do nothing about it because rules don't apply to the wealthy

[–] FrostyTrichs@lemmy.world 83 points 11 months ago (1 children)

As it turns out he may not be wealthy either lol.

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 24 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It's does not violate the very narrow gag order set by Justice Engoron, because AG James is not "court staff." That doesn't make it legal, doxxing could be charged in either New York State or Federal court (because James is a State employee, and an "officer of the law").

But it won't. Nothing is going to happen.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Imprisoning a former president for contempt of court, even as blatant as this, is always going to be a topic of skittishness among the judges.

This is an institution that typically loathes setting new precedent when it can avoid it, and imprisoning a former president, one who is running again especially, is a Rubicon that is going to intimidate even the most tough on corruption judge you can have on that bench.

The sheer unprecedentedness of this case and the others involving trump are gonna go snails pace simply because of how freaked out the judges will be over making sure every i and t have been dotted and crossed.

[–] SoylentBlake@lemm.ee 9 points 11 months ago

They're setting a precedent either way.

Either hold decorum over the individual or abandon it.

How Trump acts, and what he is allowed to get away with, is carte blanche for his followers paying attention.

If you want to be wealthy, act like the wealthy, right?

The judges either have spines or they don't. In that same vein, we either have laws that apply equally, or we don't have respect for the law across the board.

This is remedial psychology.

[–] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

As much as my justice boner is deflated by this statement, I'd rather have Trump convicted by a jury while having a competent attorney making smart decisions and defending him zealously. The last thing I want is his conviction to be overturned because someone took a shortcut.

[–] solidgrue@lemmy.world -2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

And, the standards of prosecution need to be set as high as possible because if history has anything to teach us, it's that the GOP will come after Biden as soon as that office changes hands. The precedents are there to protect future, potentially controversial leaders from (begging your pardon) trumped-up charges.

[–] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 4 points 11 months ago

Well I'd personally love to see Trump get so many things that are coming to him for his many criminal activities, the gag order they're referencing was only applied narrowly to him speaking about court staff. Letitia James is not court staff, so he hasn't actually broken that gag order at least as written currently. But it's obvious stochastic terrorism per his usual mo. And any other person would have the book thrown at them for this by the judge, gag order or no gag order.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 72 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (5 children)

The hate-filled loser literally can't help himself! I can't wait until we never have to hear his name again...

[–] untrainedtribble@lemmy.world 35 points 11 months ago

Hopefully soon. I want off this stupid fucking ride

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 13 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Unfortunately kids will be learning about this in US history for the rest of time, just like my kid had to learn about the election of 1824

[–] uphillbothways@kbin.social 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Lol. Imagine having kids in this hellscape. Imagine doing that to a child.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

They’re teenagers now so things weren’t entirely fucked when we had them.

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I can accept that if his name is always brought up as “first convicted president, trump”

[–] ericisshort@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Well here’s hoping the rest of time isn’t too long.

[–] metallic_substance@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not even his death will stop the discourse about him. He's done so much damage, we will be talking about him for generations.

Unfortunately it's just the beginning. Imagine when someone comes along with his same general agenda and tactics, but who has actual charisma and intelligence. It's only matter of time

[–] Transcendant@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

There's a podcast I love called 'BudPod'. It's two well-educated British comedians, ostensibly about current events, but often devolving into poo and wee puns. I'm catching up with current events and atm they're discussing Boris Johnson, and how even with something as codified as the US constitution, all it's taken to make it a nonsense was one man who said ".... no." Similarly when Johnson was asked to resign or not to breach certain conventions (we don't have a constiution like the US), he just said "no".

We need more than a wink and a handshake when it comes to rules governing... well, governing.

[–] LetterboxPancake@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

Until he dies due to acute underhamberdering.

[–] thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

I'll definitely be having a party to celebrate his death.

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 62 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

He must be livid all these powerful black women going after him. There's something poetic about that and my conspiracy is it's intentional. Fuck his mysogynistic and racist ass.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

deleted by creator

[–] downpunxx@kbin.social 33 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Why the fuck are they treating this fucking scumbag with kid gloves

[–] Beekeeper_Dan@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Giving him lots of rope to hang himself with (and maybe implicate others)?

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Im sure that will make Ms. James thrilled to know while derranged Americans who are conditioned to not believe the truth head towards her house.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

*derrranged

[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago

Compare the treatment of this asshole to any other citizen. F`ing NO Justice.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

As with every other violation of court orders, here is the list of consequences Donald Trump is expected to be subject to:

[–] Iwasondigg@lemmy.one 14 points 11 months ago

Hey, remember in 2016 when these conservatives all were saying if they'd done "1/10th of what Hillary has done" they'd be in jail? Yeah, that was awesome.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Wonder if he hates the fact she's black, a women or that she's already won more?

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

D. All of the above.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It does but Trump has so much money.

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)
[–] qdJzXuisAndVQb2@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, he seems to have enough to keep this stupid show running.

[–] torknorggren@lemm.ee 9 points 11 months ago

He doesn't, but his cult members are deluded enough to keep sending him their money. It's going to be interesting when there's none left to buy ads next year.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

He apparently has enough power and influence somehow.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Maybe this is true, but why thedailybeast of all websites you could have posted?

[–] raunz@mander.xyz 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

It's a pretty well known tabloid-esque website. Doesn't do a good job of reporting facts.