this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2023
126 points (97.0% liked)

politics

24774 readers
3451 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RojoSanIchiban@lemmy.world 55 points 2 years ago (3 children)

This is good, but no one pardoned by Trump deserves another round of indictments more than Roger fucking Stone. That piece of shit has been instrumental in the downfall of our democracy for decades.

[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

I think Mitch “one foot in the grave” McConnell is up there as well.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Roger Stone and Steve Bannon both.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

At least he's old; even villains don't live forever.

[–] WagesOf@artemis.camp 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Harry Kissenger has entered the chat.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Oh fuck now there's two of them

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 2 years ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Less than five years into a 20-year sentence for his role in a massive fraud scheme — bankrolling a highflying Miami Beach lifestyle of luxury cars, designer clothing and high-priced escorts — Esformes walked out of federal prison thanks to Donald Trump, who granted him clemency in the waning days of his presidency.

At stake is whether the government’s move to reprosecute the architect of one of the largest-ever health-care scams undermines Trump’s decision based on presidential powers laid out in the Constitution and historically considered the last word on a criminal conviction.

The highly unusual decision to retry a clemency recipient on hung charges has emerged as yet another flash point in the broader battle between the far right, which portrays the Justice Department as an arm of an out-of-control “deep state” opposed to anyone associated with Trump, and law-and-order proponents seeking to defend institutions of democracy against incursions by the former president and his allies.

In recent months, House Republicans orchestrated a hearing portraying the case against Esformes as a political attack, while an array of Trump acolytes have taken to conservative airwaves and social media to denounce the Justice Department.

“He has internalized his punishment on a very deep level and spends literally 18+ hours a day in study and prayer, seeking G-d’s forgiveness for his prior conduct,” according to the memo, using a shorthand for God preferred by some in the Jewish faith.

The publicity about the wedding drew attention to the treatment the business executive had received from the White House, allowing him to leapfrog over the thousands of inmates and ex-convicts who had filed formal clemency requests with the Justice Department.


The original article contains 3,257 words, the summary contains 277 words. Saved 91%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!