this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2025
317 points (97.9% liked)

World News

47864 readers
2697 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago

Honestly, NATO might be better off without them

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 18 points 2 hours ago

As directed by Vladamir Putin.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 26 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

They want out because it's stopping to be a market for the US military industries, as Europe increasingly wants to spend domestically. As such, it now has very little interest.

US: We want you to spend more on defence!
Europe: Ok, we will buy more, from our own companies!
US: That's not what I meant! I'm going home!

[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 14 minutes ago

Cause and effect are a little twisted here. Trump was already undermining NATO during is first term by saying European members should spend more. They didn't agree at the time, but the Ukraine War proved that Europe really did need a more domestic MIC, and now they are.

Trump wasn't saying it in the first place because he thought it would help NATO.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 hours ago

They wanted to leave during Trump’s first term because it helps Russia’s war with Europe

The increased spending is just meant to make the incumbents unpopular so the Russian backed candidates can win

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Isn't this the same psycho whose reaction to Minnesota politicians being assassinated was conspiracy theories?

[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Great!! Fuck right off USA!!! Without you idiotic dipshits in NATO the rest of the aligned countries don’t have to listen to your moronic whining to spend $ on US defense weaponry/planes etc. You won’t be missed and piss off. From Canada’s POV we’re really looking forward to spending billions on Saab Gripens - so we can protect ourselves from you.

[–] UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world 59 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Just removing the US from another world stage

Soon we will be completely irrelevant

Which is the plan

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 20 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Gonna be as isolated at North Korea by the end of this administration. As trusted too.

[–] conicalscientist@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Except they have the largest nuclear arsenal and the world biggest navy. They can't be ignored.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

My brother-in-law is career Navy and he says they'd get mopped by the Chinese.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 10 minutes ago* (last edited 9 minutes ago)

Eeeeehhh, if you just look at numbers of boats, yes. The US Navy has far, far more experience, though. Drones are also going to change the game in ways we're only starting to see with the Ukraine War. With that, the answer might be "everyone's boats are sunk now".

China probably couldn't gain air superiority over Taiwan, and without that, an invasion will fail. That will be true even if the US ends up losing more boats.

[–] reluctant_squidd@lemmy.ca 33 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

I keep getting this sinking feeling that this is all leading up to a precise and coordinated attack of evil.

Russia bombards the EU, the US attacks Greenland and Canada, while Israel finally bulldozes Gaza and Iran. China takes Taiwan and the south sea.

All at the same time so NATO is overwhelmed and can’t decisively defend it all without risking spreading too thin. No matter what happens, one of the bad guys gains ground.

I honestly have no idea if this is even possible, it’s based on a dream I had a few weeks ago.

Disturbing thought though.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 15 points 3 hours ago

Russia is losing against Ukraine, the fuck they gonna do against EU, unless they use nukes in which case who cares, it's game over

[–] PrimeMinisterKeyes@leminal.space 19 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Israel might bulldoze Gaza and maybe a few Mashriq countries, but it would suffocate on Iran. That's a fucking big country.

[–] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 10 points 4 hours ago

Graveyard of empires for a reason. They can try to OORAH!! MISSLES AWAY!!! Iran all they want, the resulting occupation will NEVER be a peaceful one, as there will ALWAYS be rebels in the hills and deserts.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 15 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Israel, Iran, China, and Taiwan are all outside the scope of NATO.

Canada, Greenland, and most of the EU do fall under NATO protection though. It's a defensive alliance with well defined boundaries, member countries may have interests in other parts of the world, but since none of Israel, Iran, China, or Taiwan are NATO members it's not something NATO deals with. Unless one of those countries were to attack NATO of course.

Russia is in no shape to make war on Europe right now, they have their hands full with just Ukraine, and face economic collapse. Iran is in a similar situation. Trump has stopped his 51st state talk, but he's insane so you never know. China invading Taiwan? Trump is weak (he only talks tough) so you never know. But China is authoritarian and as we've seen of late authoritarian regimes don't seem to be doing well running military campaigns so it's possible they don't even have the capability of invading Taiwan.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 5 minutes ago

China might have a 2 year window coming up where it's even possible to invade Taiwan. Their military has modernized a lot, but they probably aren't quite to the point of being able to pull it off. At the same time, they are looking at a demographic cliff from the long term implications of the One Child policy.

It's possible this window as already closed. That said, authoritarian regimes have started wars before that were terrible ideas.

[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I can see trump believing something so stupid as that, and putin might saber rattle about it, but the majority of the world, and china/india especially in this situation, probably would not go along with it. Europe still has functioning nuclear capabilities. Putin does not want nukes hitting his country, full stop. China does not want a nuclear situation kicking off with their neighbor to the north, and knows that the US under trump would likely turn on them despite a war ruining both countries. India no more wants china controlling the waters to their east than the countries immediately around those waters do, and would likely cause issues, which china also doesn't want. As we've seen in the modern times with ukraine and some of the middle east conflicts and the india/pakistan border, nuclear powers tiptoe around anything that resembles direct conflict. The recent dogfight over the border was a pretty good idea of how reserved even 'open' conflict is.

So putin is likely not going to do anything more than a symbolic grunt at his western border, and china will just slowly weather down taiwan if the u.s. is withdrawing its influence. The idea of reunification isn't THAT taboo in taiwan, and the candidates for it gather a decent chunk of votes. If the u.s. starts acting like a bitch around the world (oh, gee, just look at what's happening right now), the sentiment towards it and china could easily see a rapid shift.

[–] reluctant_squidd@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 hours ago

I agree with you, but my tinfoil hat is telling me to dig a shelter, preserve food and start making ammo. You know, for game hunting.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 35 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

If they're going to withdraw then why are they strong arming all the other nations to spending 5% GDP on defense? If they're not in NATO, who gives a fuck what they want?

[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 3 minutes ago

It was a talking point that Trump had in his first term. He tends not to let go of bad ideas once they get into his head.

At the time, people didn't take it seriously. With the Ukraine War, Europe feels like it has to now. But it's going to be domestic production, not paying US MIC companies like Trump was thinking.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 33 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Probably because they want those 5% GDP spent for contracts with the 'murican military industrial complex.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

So, they wished the increased spending to the monkey paw and got exactly what they were wishing for: countries are cancelling orders of complex US equipment all over the world, and Europe is developing a military industry to compete with them.

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 10 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

But that's definitely (hopefully?) not going to happen if they pull out of NATO.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Never underestimate the corruption and stupidity of European politicians. "Divide and conquer" works like a charm on most of our corrupt assholes. See the stupid opportunist fuck that the Germans elected chancellor. His (our :'( ) government is pushing for the use of the Palantir(!) software from fucking uber-Nazi-piece-of-shit Thiel in German administrations.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

They're demanding it of Australia (not NATO, but we do have ANZUS) too.

[–] RunawayFixer@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

For the other nations in nato it would be for the best (imo obviously). Republican usa is not a reliable ally and the other nato nations have not all come to terms with that new reality yet. If the usa quits nato, then it instantly removes all doubt and the remaining nations of NATO can immediately start work on improving the alliance, instead of being stuck in limbo for a few more years while they're hoping that the usa will somehow magically unfuck itself.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 hours ago

We already know all of that and work is already being done to improve the alliance among non-US NATO members. The US is already considered non-reliable and the only benefit of the US being a member is that it puts some doubt in the minds of adversaries long enough to build up the militaries of the non-US members.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 56 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

If the US leaves NATO, Europe would lose a lot of support.

If the US stays in NATO, they would refuse to support them anyway and could use their veto power to stop any potential action.

If they're not going to have the support of the US military either way, and the US staying in NATO could prevent the organization from taking any action at all, it may be in the best interest of Europe for the US to leave NATO so they can't cripple it from within.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 hours ago

NATO is a defensive alliance so the only thing a US veto would do is prevent Ukraine from joining NATO. But that wouldn't happen until the war is over, and it doesn't look like that's going to happen until Russia's economy collapses. At that point Russia won't be a threat for awhile so kick the US out, add Ukraine as a member since Ukraine would be a stronger ally than the US anyway.

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 173 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (3 children)

Look how stupid your country is, to hand the death of NATO to Putin because you’re on his side.

Thanks for the war and death and heat, Americans.

Fuck you.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 69 points 11 hours ago (7 children)

We're pretty pissed off at ourselves right now too. I'm sorry things got this far and wish I could offer more than fear and frustration...

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 hours ago

The thinly veiled US exceptionalism that America is funding it. And their standard attack against other nations that they are welfare states taking advantage of USA.

Fucking assholes, if people are taking advantage of us. Then be proud we are so strong and rich that they even can.

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 61 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

What's next? Helping Russia in their wars? I hope it was fucking worth it to "own the libs."

[–] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Thanks to nato, america been bombing and organizing coup in ton of countriea with impunity.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 67 points 11 hours ago

france was right all along

[–] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 2 points 5 hours ago

I hope so. The united snakes should not have any influence for all the countries they bombed and couped for decades

load more comments
view more: next ›