this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
69 points (87.9% liked)

Games

19922 readers
792 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RichardDegenne@lemmy.zip 87 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's Dark and Darker.

Saved you a click!

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Put it in the fucking title.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, I read the other guy's comment. That is already one step too many. I still had to click, for that bait.

OP: put it in the fucking title.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

OP: Thank you.

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

I wasn’t aware that assets readily available on the Epic Marketplace were considered “trade secrets.” Nexon is operating at Nintendo levels of evil in this case.

[–] Walican132@lemmy.today 17 points 1 week ago

What a terrible headline. That’s what happened but the way it’s written is so unclear.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's a free to play game so just redownload it on Steam.

[–] fadedmaster@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's also an upgrade that isn't free that's being removed. Granted the upgrade was one of their freebie offers relatively recent.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It uses its own account system, so if you had that content you should still have access to it on the platforms that aren't removing it, right?

[–] fadedmaster@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

I'm not one hundred percent sure, but the email I got from Epic says they're refunding the legendary upgrade and that Redstone shards are only good until November 1st. I don't actually play the game, but I got the email because I got the legendary upgrade when it was a freebie.

[–] hedgehog@ttrpg.network 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This happened because the developers allegedly used assets from a game called P3, which was never released, and therefore not subject to copyright infringement claims.

That isn’t how copyright works. Copyright is awarded upon creation of a work, not upon release.

[–] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.bascul.in 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

While not subject to copyright laws, it definetly counts as theft. If I'm working on a drawing and someone steals it before I complete it, it's theft.

[–] hedgehog@ttrpg.network 7 points 1 week ago

Copyright applies to unfinished works, too. There are many reasons it might not protect an unfinished work, but those reasons are still relevant even for finished works.

If someone steals your physical drawing, that’s theft. If they take a picture of it, then use the picture - or your picture + modifications - without your permission, particularly in a commercial work, then that’s copyright infringement, but not theft. If they steal your physical drawing and then take a picture and so on, then it’s both theft and copyright infringement.

Most likely this wasn’t considered copyright infringement because the allegedly copied art isn’t copyrightable, e.g., game mechanics; or the plaintiff didn’t own the copyrights themselves and thus couldn’t sue (possibly the arts were still copyrighted by the original artists, having never been purchased; possibly they were stock assets that were re-purchased by the defendant). There are any number of reasons. However, “the work wasn’t published” isn’t one of them.

On the other hand, it’s quite likely they were able to sue for theft of trade secrets for that very reason. And they might have chosen to do that simply because proving copyright infringement is much more difficult.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 1 week ago

I'm not into victim-blaming, but that's on them for being on the Epic Store.