this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
392 points (99.2% liked)

politics

24174 readers
2975 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

U.S. Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT), an ally to President Donald Trump, is in hot water over a social media post.

Lee on Sunday took to X and posted a photo of a man accused of posing as a police officer and shooting two Democratic lawmakers and their spouses.

Along with the image, Lee confusingly wrote, "This is what happens When Marxists don’t get their way."

top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] makyo@lemmy.world 20 points 10 hours ago

Mike Lee has always been a piece of fetid shit unworthy of his position. Add this to the pile for when/if the comeuppance arrives.

[–] selkiesidhe@lemm.ee 24 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah he ain't getting fired. He'll get a handshake from the Moron-in-chief.

Bet the guy who shot those senators will be quietly pardoned. Fuck, I bet the orange cancer would like to offer him a job!

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 hours ago

Last I checked, murder is still illegal in Minnesota - a pardon won't do much to offset multiple life sentences.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 11 hours ago

In the remote case he's actually fired, you can bet he got a secretary, embassy or other cushy fed job.

[–] Badabinski@kbin.earth 17 points 11 hours ago

I was in a crowd of people screaming "FUCK MIKE LEE" on Saturday and god do I want to scream it again now. Mike Lee is such a worthless cunt and I'm furious that he supposedly represents me.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 144 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

I’m betting the dipshit missed the part where the shooters family and social circle all repeatedly and consistently confirmed that the dude was a hardcore maga dipshit and “very religious”

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 34 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Apparently there's some bullshit narrative being pushed by Fox that Tim Walz is somehow responsible.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 17 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I mean, orangeboi apparently did try to cast the blame at Walz’s feet, which is absolute, categorical bullshit of the große Lüge variety

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

He does seem like he knows his was around a political assassination false flag, dontchaknow

[–] sfxrlz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 17 hours ago

„Missed“

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 44 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

What makes these people “marxist” in their mind? I.. just don’t get it.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 14 points 12 hours ago

Some kinds of people (often conservatives) don't use words to convey consistent meaning. They use words for the effect it has on the audience. It's emotions.

They see something bad, they reach into their bag of bad-thing-words, and pull out "Marxist". That's it.

They are in a fundamental sense stupid.

[–] TheLastOfHisName@lemmy.world 40 points 16 hours ago

Neither do they.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 32 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

When you don't know the actual definition of words, you can use them to mean anything.

Kinda like how they don't know what Marxist, Leninist, socialist, globalist, woke, trans, leftist, liberal, or DEI actually mean, so the right just uses them all interchangeably to mean "things I don't like or that scare me".

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly. It's just an insult to them.

A while back, one of my Trumper neighbors decided that she didn't use an elliptical work-out machine that she had bought over 2 years prior. She took it back to the store without a receipt and demanded that they give her money for it - not just store credit - even though it was well past the return date.

When telling me this story, she acknowledged her crazy behavior by saying "haha I was acting like such a liberal."

In her mind, it's as simple as "liberal = bad". The actual definitions of words mean nothing to them.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

The actual definitions of words mean nothing to them.

Insert Sartre quote about arguing with antisemites here.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 6 points 16 hours ago

They don't hate minorities.

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 17 points 14 hours ago

Mike Lee is too stupid to understand words.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 35 points 17 hours ago

More like grounds for promotion with the current administration.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 33 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

They’ll change their tune when Trump pardons the killer. (And you know he will.)

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 43 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

It's a state crime. Trump can't pardon him, but he'll try.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago

I mean it's a federal crime as well, but I understand the distinction.

[–] muffedtrims@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

He's being charged with federal murder charges

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Why did Walz make a point of saying local cops did the cuffing, taking over from FBI?

[–] bartlebee@infosec.pub 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

The arresting officers wouldn't make a decision with respect to federal charges in most instances. It's very common for local authorities to initially take a suspect into custody and if federal charges are applicable, they would be filed later after federal prosecutors have looked over the case and evidence.

I assume the suspect will likely face both state and federal charges, but federal charges have been announced that make him eligible for the death penalty. Federal prosecutors have much higher conviction rates than local prosecutors, generally.

An actual execution is unlikely to be carried out even if he is successfully convicted. That's unrelated to any hypothetical pardon, it's just because the US rarely executes inmates at the federal level these days. They usually just linger in appeals and waiting on death row for decades.

Edit: *Federal executions are rarely carried out these days when Trump isn't in office. He pushed through as many as he possibly could at the end of his first term, right up until the day he left office.

[–] Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

It can be both.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 22 points 17 hours ago

Grounds for?

Fucking spineless. Don't fucking tolerate that shit. Ever. What the fuck.

[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 3 points 12 hours ago

If Trump makes the same comment, will it be grounds to remove him from office?

[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 15 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Along with the image, Lee confusingly wrote, "This is what happens When Marxists don’t get their way."

It is confusing because I'd guess there are no Marxists in office anywhere in the USA. But then he's not totally wrong... If Marxists got their way, Trump supporters probably wouldn't be emboldened to murder anyone who leans further left than Bush. Technically, it's a pro-Marxist message.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 30 points 17 hours ago

I thought he was saying the killer was a Marxist. Which is obviously false but aligns with the Republicans' utter refusal to understand words.