this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2025
465 points (97.4% liked)

Linux

56084 readers
372 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by AlpΓ‘r-Etele MΓ©der, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Single core, 32 bit CPU, can't even do video playback on VLC. But it kinda works for some offline work, like text editing, and even emulation through zsnes! It's crazy how Linux keeps old hardware like this running.

Thankfully though, this laptop CPU is upgradable, and so is the ram, so I'm planning on revitalizing and bringing this old Itautec to the 21st century πŸ˜„

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 68 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

I think my lowest was a 33 MHz 486sx (maybe DX) with 8MB of RAM.

I wouldn't want to try it today though.

[–] umbraroze@piefed.social 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The first machine I ran Linux on was a 486DX 33MHz too. I think it had 8 MB (or some weird thing like 4 MB originally and randomly stuck 8 MB addition? I don't remember anymore.)

[–] folekaule@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

I had the exact same configuration. 4MB RAM upgraded to 8MB. 40MB HDD upgraded to 200MB later. And the fugliest case with triangular pastel buttons you ever saw. Ran Windows 3.11 then Slackware Linux on that for many years.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] addie@feddit.uk 7 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, mine was similar. Had some old Win95 machines from work that were getting thrown away; scavenged as much RAM as possible into one case and left Red Hat Linux downloading overnight on the company modem. Needed two boxes of floppy disks for the installer, and I joined up a 60 MB and an 80MB hard drive using LVM to create the installation drive. It was a surprisingly functional machine - much better at networking than it was as a Win95 computer - but yeah, those days are long gone.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 66 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

2GB of RAM? Low?

Were you born after the year 2000?

[–] merci3@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Haha, I've been used to 4gb ram minimum for most of my life πŸ˜†

[–] tonyn@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I remember when 128MB RAM sticks were $400

[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I remember expanding my Amiga with 512KB to 1MB Fast RAM and later going crazy with another two megabyte Slow RAM.

[–] dylanmorgan@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I remember my dad’s friend upgrading our PC clone to 640K. He used a soldering iron.

[–] phantomwise@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

I remember when computers had no memory and the storage was on punch cards made from mammoth leather that we had to tan ourselves after spending our weekends hunting the mammoth with spears. Also we carved our code by hand on stone tablets. Young people these days have it easy.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] tonyn@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 weeks ago

Get off my lawn

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Lmao, I've ran Linux on an eeePC with 1GB RAM and 900MHz Intel Atom. Compiling gcc & glibc could take hours.

Edit: RPi3 still got only 1GB, BeagleBone Black even got 512MB, don't forget RPi0

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

I still have a cool laptop (with Mandrake and kde) with 192 megs of memory somewhere.

[–] Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

2 gigs of ram ? You probably can have an emulation station up to PS1 with this hardware.

[–] merci3@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh, I tried.. But the CPU/GPU is just TOO slow for that, SNES was the best I could do

[–] Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 weeks ago

I always forget how crappy Intel iGPUs are.

[–] slothrop@lemmy.ca 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] twinnie@feddit.uk 19 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

I rushed to the comments when I saw a 1.6ghz CPU being called low end but I see OPs already been dealt with. I remember the first ever 1ghz CPU being an overclocked nitrogen cooled AMD Athlon. Me and my mates were all talking about it when it happened.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 18 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Whilst the Celeron was indeed utter cack, 2 GB has me making four Yorkshiremen-style "2GB? Luxury!" style comments.

I used to run Ubuntu on my Acer Aspire 1362 WMLi back in 2005. I had 512 MB of RAM and a 2800+ Sempron processor.

That said, looking at this:
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare/1351vs710/Mobile-AMD-Sempron-2800+-vs-Intel-Celeron-M-1.60GHz

My old Sempron was a better CPU than that piece of junk Celeron you've got there. Giving it 2GB of RAM is hilarious!

[–] merci3@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ikr? Makes me wonder what that celeron was meant for? It barely ran the Win 7 that came preinstalled. That's why I'm so happy to see it run modern Debian with modern packages. Also why I'm doing some research on CPUs to upgrade it to

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 weeks ago

Hell yeah! Love seeing old hardware like this still running a modern OS.

With Linux, if your hardware is a decade old, you've barely even reached middle-age.

Meanwhile Windows 11 won't even allow an official install on hardware that's 4-5 years old.

Long live Linux & FOSS ✊

[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Celeron M with 2GB ram? That's actually not low at all :p

I bet it runs NetBSD or Tinycore flawlessly

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] answersplease77@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

thats my current laptop

Edit: im exagerating but I really have 20-yr 32-bit Dell laptops running minimal debian linux. and my current laptop is 10+ yrs old Lenovo which I already replaced its screen, rams, keyboard, bluetooth, usb ports... and it's still working flawlessly for daily tasks, video/music editing, coding and programming, internet browsing :D

[–] BartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 2 weeks ago

I’m pretty certain the first computer I installed Linux on was a Pentium 75 with 4MB of RAM. I know I ran it on some 486s booting off floppys at work. We were at 10,000 feet and couldn’t trust the lifespan of spinning rust.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I've run Linux on a 166MHz Pentium with 64MB of RAM. There's not much modern software that will run on that hardware though.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] eugenia@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Are you using systemd? Because 317 MB of RAM is really low for a normal Debian installation with XFce. At my mom's 2 GB ram laptop, it uses 850 MB on a cold boot.

[–] LeFantome@programming.dev 6 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

It is because it is 32 bit. You can run a 32 bit distro on your machine too if you really want.

You can get a full Trinity desktop on Q4OS in 130 MB of RAM (32 bit edition).

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] gjoel@programming.dev 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I suspect my first Linux ran on an 80mhz AMD K6. I did however also run it on a retired dual core UltraSPARC some years later I had somehow gotten my hands on. It might have been faster, but at that time it sure felt slow. And it sounded like a train passing through when it was on. In retrospect installing Gentoo on it was an optimistic endeavour.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

I had slackware on my 386DX 40. 4mb ram. It was kinda short-lived. I never got my modem working. I got a book, paged thought it. Learning shit was hard in the 90's Internet.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 7 points 2 weeks ago

itautec

reproduto(...)

points Brazilian

[–] piranhaconda@mander.xyz 7 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

My 2011 MacBook pro is still chugging along thanks to Linux.

I upgraded 4GB RAM to 16GB, upgraded the HDD to SSD, and replaced the CD drive with a second SSD. Sadly the screen is almost completely gone, occasionally intermittent, probably a cable gone bad, not sure, but the mini display port is working fine for an external monitor.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 6 points 3 weeks ago

If Minix counts, I got it running on a 286 some years ago. I don't remember how much RAM it had, but it was very little.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Ran an ISP on a Pentium 90 and a few 486s. Linux and FreeBSD!

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Stories from the "good" old days running Linux on a 386 machine with 4 MB or less of memory aside, in the present day it's still perfectly normal to run Linux on a much weaker machine as a server - you can just rent a the cheapest VPS you can find (which nowadays will have 128 MB, maybe 256MB, and definitelly only give you a single core) and install it there.

Of course, it won't be something with X-Windows or Wayland, much less stuff like LibreOffice.

I think the server distribution of Ubunto might fit such a VPS, though there are server-specific Linux distros that will for sure fit and if everything fails TinyCore Linux will fit in a potato.

I current have a server like that using AlmaLinux on a VPS with less than 1GB in memory, which is used only as a Git repository and that machine is overkill for it (it's the lowest end VPS with enough storage space for a Git repository big enough for the projects I'm working on, so judging by the server management interface and linux meminfo, that machine's CPU power and memory are in practice far more than needed).

If you're willing to live with a command line interface, you can run Linux on $50 worth of hardware.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] misterbzr@lemm.ee 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

My daily driver at home has the same specs. Works fine.

[–] merci3@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Do you daily drive htop or something? πŸ˜†

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] psyc@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/05/linux-to-end-support-for-1989s-hottest-chip-the-486-with-next-release/

Considering they just dropped i486 support this year I’d say you’re running this on a super computer by comparison

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Ran Ubuntu 8 with Compiz and integrated graphics on a Pentium 4 with 512MB RAM. It was an awful machine, but Linux made it great to use. I still miss the peak of GTK2 + Emerald.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I’m planning on revitalizing and bringing this old Itautec to the 21st century

I think it was born in the 21st century? From this it looks like the first Celeron M was in 2004, and the first at that clockspeed was 2005.

Also, 2GB of RAM is plenty for many purposes - that's more than any Raspberry Pi before the Pi 4 had!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Are we competing again?

I'm proud to be setting up a rhel10 desktop, as it'll be the first time I ran Linux as a desktop in 30 years of a Linux/Unix career.

To rephrase: I ran XFree86 on a 4mb i386 machine 30 years ago.

What do I win?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] medem@lemmy.wtf 5 points 2 weeks ago

[ laughs in NetBSD ]

[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago

Those are better specs than what I used throughout college (an Asus Eee PC running Debian with Xfce and Openbox). Not a powerful machine, but I absolutely loved that thing.

[–] loudWaterEnjoyer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I run a rpi zero w first gen

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kurcatovium@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago

Up 'til 2022 or 2023 company I work for used Pentium 4 at POS PCs running ancient openSUSE. They would be still in service if it weren't for leaking/swollen caps on most motherboards. Pure power wasn't really there, but it was plenty enough to run that checkout software...

[–] cy_narrator@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes the laptop CPU and RAM may be upgradeable but have you considered the parts availability? Considering its a 32bit CPU

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

https://shop.hak5.org/products/shark-jack technically runs openwrt.

SoC: 580MHz MediaTek MT7628 mips CPU


Memory: 64 MB DDR2 RAM, 64 MB SPI Flash
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί