this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2025
451 points (98.1% liked)

Science Memes

15158 readers
2885 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

seeking for

  1. Looking for
  2. Seeking

You can choose only one lane.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 hours ago

Looking to seek-for

[–] ladicius@lemmy.world 44 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Whatever you add to both sides of the equation neutralises each other.

So essentially you don't need it.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 10 hours ago

Knda like AI, nobody needs it

[–] coherent_domain@infosec.pub 27 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Only when addition have a inverse operation.

[–] anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 10 hours ago

If you have a theory of everything, I suspect whatever algebraic structure the terms follow, is at least a ring and therefore has additive inverses.

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 18 points 20 hours ago

is the evil funding man going to eat the gimp pepper

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

Even if they had a complete model of all of physics, it still wouldn't answer all questions, as a lot of important data is just random. Whether nature decided to go with D-molecule or L-molecule is essentially random.

[–] fckreddit@lemmy.ml 14 points 21 hours ago

Even if you have an equation, doesn't mean you can solve it. N-body problem is a perfect example.

You cannot determine all the Parameters of the equations accurately. Changing the parameters could drastically alter the output behavior. Finally, you don't know the initial conditions too.

These are the challenges that classical physics have to deal with. Quantum is not even factored into, yet.

Welcome to the land of Nonlinear Dynamics. We have bifurcations, strange attractors and of course, whole lotta chaos.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 17 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I would argue that the choice of L- or D-molecules is not a physics question so much as a chemistry/biology one.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

still an important question

sometimes you hear people say that when we have "figured out everything about physics", then we'd have figured out everything about the world, as the world is guided by physical principles.

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 12 points 22 hours ago

The hubris of that statement could only come from a physicist! We would indeed have a foundation upon which to understand ~~everything~~ many things, if only we could keep up with issues like scale, events happening far away, and historical choices as you pointed it.

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 7 points 20 hours ago

iirc L-aminoacids and D-sugars, that is these observed in nature, are very slightly more stable than the opposite because of weak interaction

probably it's just down to a specific piece of quartz or soot that got lucky and chiral amplification gets you from there

also it's not physics, or more precisely it's a very physicy subbranch of chemistry, and it's done by chemists because physicists suck at doing chemistry for some reason (i've seen it firsthand)

[–] kaeurenne@lemmy.kadaikupi.space 16 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

📱 = "Ah just another phone"
📱 + AI = "Wow! Great! I'm going to buy this!

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

💻 = "Ah just another laptop"

💻 + AI = "Wow! An AI enabled Microsoft Copilot+ Laptop™, I love consoooooming! Please take all of my personal information Microsoft"

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 11 points 19 hours ago

Nope. It has the inverse effect on regular customers, no joke.

[–] loomy@lemy.lol 2 points 14 hours ago

I don't want to upvote this ; but I will.