this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
206 points (98.6% liked)

politics

24013 readers
4062 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 hour ago

As ICE was arresting people he was there to tell them to get a job ignoring if they already had one.

[–] Brotha_Jaufrey@lemmy.world 12 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

What the fuck is going on, man

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

America is beyond any possible satire.

Not to mention they say "embedded" as if these goons are dodging sniper fire and mortars in Fallujah. Dude probably got his photo op and then walked over to Erewon for a $19 smoothie.

[–] Onyxonblack@lemm.ee 7 points 3 hours ago

In that picture it looks like his human-mask is slipping.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 73 points 6 hours ago (3 children)
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 12 points 3 hours ago

Yet another reality show loser. Birds of a feather.

[–] TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world 24 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

1-Why did ICE allow Dr. Phil to be in their group?

Well, he's a well-known media figure of claims to be centrist and unbiased, so his presence/footage could have provided a veneer of doubt to most other media coverage. They eventually need SOMEONE to play that role if they don't want to be the literal bad guys

2-Why did Dr. Phil agree to do this?

Well, as much as he claims to be unbiased and trustworthy, more often than not, his show is pretty much just "guilt trip the nonconformist in front of an audience until they break down and hug their relatives who brought them here" with some commercials sprinkled in for ~~fun~~ profit. He's basically a big bully with the 'street cred' (moustasche) to get away with it

3-Why did anyone think this would work at all?

Well, I don't have the numbers to confirm this, but as an American, I'm confident in saying that most Americans would trust Dr. Phil, more than some random/local reporters (even if that should NOT be the case). Even if you've never watched a second of his show, you've probably heard his voice, seen others imitate him, or are at least AWARE of his existence, and we're more likely to trust a source we've already encountered before.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not so sure about number 3. He gets made fun of a lot. Well, he got made fun of a lot then everyone seemed to forget him. Even people with ridiculous accents made fun of his accent (of which I am one).

The people who believe him are obviously out there. But I'd like to think that most people realize that his show was (is? I don't know) just Jerry Springer with fewer chairs being thrown and less honesty about what they're there for.

On the other hand, I have no good explanation about why they think it would work at all without what you said. So maybe?

[–] TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world 1 points 55 minutes ago

As a fellow southwestern drunk, cheers to that dudeski

[–] ThatsTheSpirit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 5 hours ago

The burning question of our times

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 43 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

POS, listen to Behind the Bastards about him if you want to know why.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 43 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

A fun piece of trivia is that he lost is license to practice as a counselor after having a relationship with one of his teenaged clients.

For starters.

[–] kobra@lemmy.zip 19 points 4 hours ago

I took a psychology intro class like 20 years ago and that professor hated Dr. Phil with an absolute passion because of how objectively bad he was as a representative for their field.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 33 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Fuck Dr Phil, Oz, and especially Oprah.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 25 points 5 hours ago

Dr Phil is the kind of guy who in the 19th century I would have expected to roll into town with a wagon selling a miracle cure.

I would also expect them to roll out of town on a rail car, tied up to a post, and covered in tar and feathers.

[–] TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not saying no to any of these, but why ESPECIALLY Oprah? I try not to know too much about any of them, but Phil seems especially bad considering how he lost his license, I don't think Oprah did anything like that. Did she?

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 27 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

Oprah is who made Dr. Phil and Dr. Oz public figures. She made them famous on her show.

Edit:

[Dr. Phil] McGraw rose to fame with appearances on The Oprah Winfrey Show in the late 1990s. Oprah Winfrey then helped McGraw launch his own advice show, Dr. Phil, in September 2002.

In 2003, Oprah Winfrey was the first guest on the Discovery Channel series Second Opinion with Dr. Oz, and he was a regular guest on The Oprah Winfrey Show, making more than sixty appearances. In 2009, The Dr. Oz Show, a daily television program about medical matters and health, was launched by Winfrey's Harpo Productions and Sony Pictures Television, running for 13 seasons.

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 1 points 17 minutes ago

And Oprah loves her some Weinstein

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I’ve come to the conclusion that everybody in Hollywood is out for money and fame, and that some are just very smart about keeping their opinions to themselves so as not to shatter the illusion of being good people.

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 1 points 17 minutes ago

There's the odd actor who's outspokenly not a shitbag; Pedro Pascal comes to mind as a recent example

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 25 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

lol holy fuck every time he does something incredibly dumb and pointless, I think “this is it; surely he won’t top this”.

And yet here we are.

[–] kobra@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Dr. Phil and my pillow guy have to be related, right?

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 1 points 48 minutes ago

the mustache binds them

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

He's there to kiss any boo-boos.

He's the only one they could find that was certifiable.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I don't think so .... because anything he does is the opposite of whatever an actual doctor is supposed to do.

[–] Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz 5 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Does your doctor kiss your boo boos? Because I don't think your doctor is supposed to do that.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 hours ago

Show me on this doll where the doctor kissed you.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Used to give me suckers as a kid. Not anymore.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

The implication of certifiable is often “certifiably insane”.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago

DING, DING, DING, we have a winner!

[–] L0rdMathias@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

A once great a beautiful city, Los Angeles [Citation Needed]

[–] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

While I stand in solidarity with my fellow Californians, LA is objectively the worst part of California.

[–] Tower@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

I think you're wrong. Reason - I've been to Bakersfield. And Barstow. And Inyokern. And Blythe. And Stockton.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Stockton makes the list but not Fresno or Methdesto?

[–] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

I can see your point, but I respectfully disagree. I find the desert to fairly beautiful, and at least Bakersfield and Stockton have more of a small-town feel. IMO, LA combines all the negatives of Stockton and Bakersfield into one plasticized, superficial mess; LA's better at covering up their flaws, but there's a certain authenticity in owning your blemishes.