this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
371 points (89.7% liked)

Technology

72506 readers
3616 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] p_kanarinac@retrolemmy.com 139 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] elvith@feddit.org 67 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Depends. Are you from the EU or not?

[–] p_kanarinac@retrolemmy.com 91 points 1 month ago

I am, that's why it sounds illegal. :D

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 64 points 1 month ago (2 children)

In parallel, Google has rolled out its Play Integrity API, which allows developers to limit app functionality when sideloaded, effectively pushing users to install apps only through the Google Play Store.

All of this while EU forbids Apple to do the same, what is the idea here? Measuring how EU reacts?

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

Is it the same though? Google is allowing the developers to choose to prevent sideloading. I thought Apple's issue was that they prevented side loading completely.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 64 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yikes this really doesn't look good. Is there any reporting on it from independent journalists (or anyone else who isn't also advertising their own competing operating system)?

[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 42 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not that I've seen and I'd take what Purism say with a grain of salt: they've acted like pretty shitty gatekeepers themselves. Nothing they mentioned in the article seems too egregious in truth and they're exaggerating the scale of it: Play Store app DRM exists already, and the restrictions on browser-downloaded apps they mention can be bypassed (albeit by having to go into settings) and don't apply to apps installed through other apps stores (F-Droid, etc).

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 12 points 1 month ago

Nothing they mentioned in the article seems too egregious in truth

Doesn't it? To be honest, if the article is telling the truth and not exaggerated, I find this pretty egregious. How you installed an app should be irrelevant, so the idea of an API to say "did this come from the Play Store" is fucking shit. And the ability to block installation of apps that call certain APIs entirely is even worse.

[–] chameleon@fedia.io 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I haven't seen proper reporting but the Play Integrity install source thing is accurate. There's a reasonably good overview straight from the devil himself.

Lots of things that have very valid reasons on paper that also just happen to give Google a stupid amount of control and will backfire for a somewhat small percentage of people in very bad ways. We've been at "you can't use pretty much any bank unless you agree to either Google or Apple terms" for quite some years now, now we're giving those same app developers ways to detect if their device has accessibility APIs enabled (useful to protect against bot farms, but also a functional check for "you're able-bodied") or is in security support (also a functional check for "not reliant on hand-me-downs").

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] viking@infosec.pub 43 points 1 month ago

This article is a thinly veiled ad paired with fearmongering to get gullible users to buy the shit phones they sell (or not, some people have been on "waitlists" for 5+ years after providing a full payment).

Granted, their phones are fully open, but have next to no apps.

Personally I'll stick with Android 12, rooted, and see what the future brings.

[–] Integrate777@discuss.online 41 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

In Singapore, lots of boomers are downloading scam apps from facebook lured by promises of discounts and free gifts, handing out accessibility privileges, and they'll even argue vehemently against loved ones and bank staff when confronted. When it all inevitably blows up, they blame absolutely everyone except themselves, including praising Apple for some reason.

Being the largest voting block, they managed to get banks responsible for reimbursing their losses and there was even an idea floated of getting everyone to contribute to a shitty scam insurance fund. Many major banking apps are paranoid af and block usage from simple things like usb debugging turned on.

Absolutely stupidity. And there's nothing we can do about it when the politicians love them so much.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Usb debugging is sketchy as shit. You should almost never turn that on, and immediately turn it off once you're finished with whatever it is you're doing with that on.

[–] mazzilius_marsti@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

agree completely. But I recently broke my phone screen, the usual Samsung green screen of death, and I wish I had that turned on to copy the data over lol.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lyra_Lycan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

effectively pushing users to install apps only through the Google Play Store

I wonder what this will mean for Aurora and Fdroid etc.

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This is my immediate first thought seeing this. This fucking sucks. Part of the whole benefit of something like LineageOS or e (OS?) was being able to use Fdroid to stay away from Google as much as possible. Now this is going to potentially make things weird.

[–] mybuttnolie@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 month ago

doesn't do anything to f-droid, but probably kills aurora a bit. the developer can prevent their app from being sideloaded. why would one prevent that if they are distributing via f-droid too?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 7 points 1 month ago (11 children)

Well, both will be unable to install certain types of apps.

[–] Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Aaaaand now I'm carrying around a laptop again, at least mini pcs are tiny now, maybe a small handheld would do...

if any of this shit hinders me, I'll get a dumb phone and the cheapest iphone available for manditory work-based things and say so-long to being a mobile OS user.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] 10001110101@lemm.ee 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Kinda depressing that all of big-tech seems to have given up "innovating" (finding applications for publicly-funded research), and have become rent-seeking dinosaurs.

[–] stormeuh@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

Capitalism baby

[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Purism makes premium phones..." Haaaaaaaaa 😂

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Correction: purism sells mediocre phones for premium prices.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

One of the reasons why I got a Android over ios :(

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Why is it so hard to "Don't be Evil"

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

From what I can tell, all of this shit is on Google versions of Android. If you are on AOSP such as lineage or graphene, from what I understand this has no effect whatsoever.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The restrictions on apk access over the past 10 years have already been an annoying pita. Many of the best power user apks have had to gut themselves over their original functionality, all while obtaining root access over your owned devices has become harder or next to impossible.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 7 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Let them keep those. I hereby declare that if I don't own the thing, I ain't buying it. So no root, no $$$.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] kratoz29@lemm.ee 18 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Degoogled ROMs are gonna be the bomb in the future.

[–] anticurrent@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Maybe you should curb your enthusiasm a bit. have you seen what it take to unlock the bootloader from most manufacturers? you might even need your grandma's birth certificate before you're allowed to do so in the future

[–] kadup@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Certainly depends on where you live.

Unlocking a Samsung phone is trivial here.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Teknikal@eviltoast.org 16 points 1 month ago

Not bothered if necessary Il patch every apk before installing it, one more stupid American move that will ultimately give the entire market to the Chinese.

[–] FourWaveforms@lemm.ee 14 points 1 month ago

...in Singapore...

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There is exactly one app I use that is available only on play store - my bank.

I don't really need the app.

They have a website.

I have a few phones, just got one that now has grapheneOS.

I've been using it for a few weeks to see how it works before I switch over anything to use it as my main. it has a lot of very interesting privacy/security features to test out.

Either way, I don't get anything from the play store anymore.

It's F(L)OSS or a website.

As god intended.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Are they talking about the changes that were made that allow a dev to prevent their app from launching if it fails a Play integrity check?

If so I don’t see that as a big deal since it is up to the dev to use it. OSS devs that want to distribute their app via apk download won’t enable it, and anyone distributing cracked apks will just disable that along with whatever other changes they are making.

[–] KingRandomGuy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Some apps only require 'basic' play integrity verification, but now check to see if they're installed via the Play Store. They refuse to run if they're installed via an alternative source.

This has been a problem for GrapheneOS, since some apps filter themselves out of the Play Store search if you don't pass strong play integrity, despite the fact that they don't require it. Luckily Graphene now had a bypass for this.

[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago (5 children)

From the article it sounds like the limitations come for some app types downloaded directly from a browser. I think this doesn't affect alternate app stores like f-droid where you are effectively delegating approval to their process.

I have come across the other limitations mentioned with the Home Assistant companion app which I could only get matter registration to work with the version downloaded from the Play store.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 13 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Well, but where do you get F-Droid? Or stuff like ReVanced Manager.

Or Epic's stuff. Wasn't Google just now sued for this shit and nobody understood why Google lost and Apple didn't because you can easily sideload on Android.

[–] manxu@piefed.social 6 points 1 month ago

I completely agree. Unless Google is forced to install more than one app store by default, or forced to have multiple app stores downloadable on Play Store, three is no realistic way to install a third party app store on a phone. In both cases, Google's cooperation is required.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›