shortwavesurfer

joined 10 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 hours ago

Oh, okay. I was not aware there were specific phone cases made for using underwater, although that's still not something I would ever wish to participate in. Case or not.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

Absolutely no way would I ever submerge my phone underwater on purpose. No matter whether it said it was waterproof or not. That would be just an absolute no-no for me.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago

I heard a libertarian viewpoint that seems to make sense to me, and that's that the police would be required to carry liability insurance. So if they were horrible fucking people, then they would get quickly priced out of the market with their insurance rates and have to find another job of where they weren't hurting people.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip -4 points 15 hours ago

Exactly. Then the states would have the freedom to enforce the rules they wanted to within their borders. And people would have the ability to choose what rules they wanted to live under.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip -5 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Oh no. I mean completely abolish the federal government. No federal government at all. Zero. Not a zilch. The federal government is too many steps removed from the people and does not give a shit. At least if we had only the 50 state governments, they would be closer to the people and have to care more about what the people thought.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 19 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

To be fair, the big reason for being against the cops is qualified immunity. Even though not many cases require qualified immunity, the fact that it exists at all is a serious problem. If the police do something wrong, they should be able to be sued in court and let a jury hear both sides of the argument. I don't think all individuals who are police are bad people, but they work for the government have no duty to serve and enforce laws passed down by goons.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 1 points 18 hours ago

I had a screen issue with mine after a while where the bottom right hand corner of the screen was trying to separate from the body a little bit and there was like this green line that showed up in the middle of my display. It was annoying as hell. Also, that was before I started only letting my battery charge up to 80% and so my battery was pretty well shot by the time that occurred as well.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 1 points 18 hours ago

I agree. I was thinking of 18 hours myself because 12 seems a little bit too short. But 24 or above seems far too long.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 2 points 18 hours ago

Not particularly, no. Although I do use Odyssey, because there are at least some channels that were on YouTube that I watch from there, such as Scott Manley, talking about rockets. And I think undecided or something like that is on there as well.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 27 points 18 hours ago (6 children)

Exactly. Apparently this is a feature. And I find it to be absolutely fucking fantastic because fuck the police. Anything that makes their job harder is worth doing.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 8 points 19 hours ago

This is not for devices where the pin has been entered incorrectly too many times. This is for devices that the police have seized and are awaiting forensics to pull data from.

 

In order to boost Haveno adoption, We propose the following:

  • RETO lowers its trade fees to 0%

in return:

  • RETO receives the equivalent of X per year or Y per month with the first 4 months paid up-front, subsequent payments on a monthly basis.

  • Once monthly RETO volume exceeds 1M fiat and sustains it for 3 months in a row, RETO reintroduces a fee and pays back any fees above X until the total amount paid back is equal to the total amount previously received.

Example:

If RETO earns Z in a month, it pays back Z-Y.

Should volume suddenly be drastically higher than expected, we will not reimburse RETO for “lost” trade fees and assume we have reached our goal in boosting Haveno adoption.

This agreement is initially going to last until 2025-12-31 with the first payment dated back to 2024- 11-01 under the condition that the 0% trade fee goes into effect with the release of Haveno v1.0.13.

 

So recently I've been seeing the trend where Android OEMs such as Google, Samsung, etc. have been extending their software release times up to like five, six, and seven years after device release. Clearly, phone hardware has gotten to the point where it can support software for that long, and computers have been in that stage for a very long time. From what I can tell, the only OEM that does this currently might be Fairphone.

Edit: The battery is the thing that goes the fastest so manufacturers could just offer new batteries and that would solve a lot of the problem.

 

Why use HTTP over SOCKS5? SOCKS seems much more common.

view more: next ›