this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023

39 points (95.3% liked)

politics

19089 readers

3832 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

outrageousmatter@lemmy.world

aidan@lemmy.world

jordanlund@lemmy.world

HLMenckenFan@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

The Republican war on colleges (www.axios.com)

submitted 1 year ago by ATQ@lemm.ee to c/politics@lemmy.world

32 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Former President Trump and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, the two GOP presidential frontrunners, have both promised a crackdown on colleges should they occupy the White House — a stark reflection of the right's growing skepticism of higher education.

Some Republican complaints about colleges are related to broader concern about "wokeness" and free speech. But others hint at deeper questions about the value of college, and how to ensure a degree comes with an appropriate economic return.

top 30 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] TechyDad@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They see colleges as "liberal wokeness indoctrination centers" because their kids go to college and return more liberal. In a way, they're right, but it's not because colleges are actively indoctrinating students.

When you grow up in a town, you're likely to be surrounded by people like you. They all look like you and think like you. People who look and think different are "strange others" and stereotypes about these people abound.

Then, you go to college. Suddenly, you're surrounded by people who look different and think differently. That stereotype you have about Group A? Well, you've now met 5 people who are in Group A and none of them fit the stereotype. Your biases get shattered and you start to see people as actual people instead of "strange others."

Then you go back home. Nobody back home has met all the people you met. They still use the old stereotypes that you've discarded. To them, you've changed. They're right, but it's because your experiences have shaped how you see the world not because someone strapped you to a chair and forced "wokeness" into you.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pretty much. I'd even go a step further and say the classic right-winger finds pretty much all types of education as an enemy now for potentially informing their kids that the BS they've been thought at home may not be accurate or based in fact. All of these right-wing groups trying to get books banned, teachers fired, and school curriculum changed pretty much spells it out.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A lot of hardcore right-wingers are also homeschooling their kids these days.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

It’s not even ‘these days’ hardcore right wingers have done this since I was in school in the 90s. It’s just that more right wingers have become more hardcore than before.

[–] JTode@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I had the benefit of a better environment growing up, but when I was at Uni, I cannot say how many people told me this story, particularly about gay folks.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I had a buddy who basically could not believe that black people weren't all savages out to rape and murder. Dude was raised in the backwoods of Georgia and probably never actually met a black person face to face in his whole life.

[–] halfempty@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not just Higher Education. Republicans are at war with gradeschool education as well. They know full well that ignorant people are more easily manipulated.

[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They want dumb uninformed slave labor.

[–] Matt_Shatt@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The shortsightedness is mind blowing. What happens in a generation when the US can’t produce enough scientists and engineers? We have to bring in smart people from other countries. And they won’t like that either. It’s astonishing.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Because THE SENATOR'S kids will be the engineers and scientists. They have the money to be sent to very nice upscale private schools where they learn all that stuff. You, in the other hand, do not, nor do you need all that fancy learning about physics and chemistry and history. All you need to know is how to DO YOUR JOB.

Basically, large parts of the GOP are actually trying to reinvent the aristocracy.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Can’t have an educated populace. They might vote. Or worse — they might want better jobs and a living wage.

[–] BobVersionFour@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Get them yound and keep them dumb shocking to no one republican and most religion have the same game plan.

[–] Cobrachickenwing@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

Only the war on state and community colleges. Not ivy league rich universities like Harvard, Yale and Stanford where the majority of Republican donors matriculated.

[–] Skanky@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Republicans against education? Tale as old as time...

[–] pwnieb0y@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Didn't they both go to Ivy League schools? Just sayin'.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Education for me and not for thee. Same shit, different pot.

[–] SpeakinTelnet@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Dammit I taught higher education was a great thing but now I'm not so sure.

[–] Empyreus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Have to fight higher education, because they won't be able to control their base as easy

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Quite a number of people would be much better focusing on the trades. Many trades pay quite well and have a shortage of manpower. Colleges are too expensive for what you get.

[+] MasterObee@lemmy.world -18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Colleges war on Republicans*

It's pretty simple - the left gives a ton of money to colleges, why wouldn't they try to push left talking points and get more money? If republicans would give more money to colleges, we all know that the colleges would push more right wing talking points.

[–] mrnotoriousman@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Exactly what talking points are you referring to being pushed in higher ed across the country?

[+] MasterObee@lemmy.world -7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

anti-racism, political violence, CRT, gender theory, marxism

[–] mrnotoriousman@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

All you did was list off right wing buzzwords lmao. Have you ever stepped foot in a university? Do you think random electives are being forced on every student or something? I have 2 degrees and didn't experience any of the above.

edit: also "anti-racism" sounds like some white supremacist dog whistle

[–] MasterObee@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Have you ever stepped foot in a university?

I went to college from 2012-2017, I witnessed it first hand.

Do you think random electives are being forced on every student or something?

Sociology was, which we had CRT curriculum.

edit: also “anti-racism” sounds like some white supremacist dog whistle

It's the lefts all encompassing buzz word, so the left can criticize people for not being racist.

If I say 'I'm not racist" they respond "well it doesn't matter if you're racist or not, if you aren't anti-racist you're perpetuating white supremacy."

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If I say 'I'm not racist" they respond "well it doesn't matter if you're racist or not, if you aren't anti-racist you're perpetuating white supremacy."

So maybe I'm just misinterpreting your idea of what "anti-racist" means, but it sounds like a business owner saying "I don't actively discriminate against people based on race, but they're saying if I don't support measures so other people can't discriminate against people based on race, I'm perpetuating white supremacy." That seems a pretty reasonable stance.

Being otherwise neutral to an established system is perpetuating it, even if you don't participate in it yourself. I'm not sure what's confusing about that. Again, unless I'm misunderstanding your interpretation of "anti-racist."

[–] MasterObee@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

So maybe I’m just misinterpreting your idea of what “anti-racist”

You are. Anti-racism is the lifestyle of fighting 'racism' in every day life. However, the definition of 'racism' has changed in academia so it's not actually about treating races unequally, it's treating the right races unequally.

So, in your example, if that business owner isn't hiring minority races over white races, they are not anti-racist, therefore, they are racist.

Being otherwise neutral to an established system is perpetuating it

See you're doing it here. Someone can be neutral to race; not making any determinations based on race, but if you say the established system, which you can't define, is racist (once again, the 'updated' definition of racism which says only white people can be racist), you want to claim anybody that isn't donating to the right charity, or supporting your causes, is racist?

So essentially, you've made 'racism' entirely subjective based on policies that you yourself (or the left in general) determines.

Racism used to mean a very objective thing: if you treat people differently based on their race. Now it's entirely subjective at the whim of one political parties definition.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

anti-racism

Sorry, you're saying that's a bad thing?

[–] ZombieTheZombieCat@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you saying like the DNC actually gives money to colleges? Or maybe people you just don't like make private donations, which has nothing to do with what's taught

[–] MasterObee@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

Are you saying like the DNC actually gives money to colleges?

Idk about colleges, but the DNC and teachers unions definitely.

? Or maybe people you just don’t like make private donations, which has nothing to do with what’s taught

Some. But what I'm saying is democrats tend to fund colleges at a much higher rate. Why wouldn't the colleges buddy up for privileges?

This is what we call "Conflict of Interest"

[–] Captainvaqina@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Maybe Republicans could try becoming as successful as Democrats. Or having any policies or direction whatsoever. Or maybe they could try helping people instead of stripping individuals of their rights whilst also bending over and spreading their corp tax and reg cuts.

load more comments