this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
971 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

70253 readers
3736 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZMoney@lemmy.world 1 points 54 minutes ago

If we decide to ban smartphones from schools we should ban them from work too. I'm supposed to be writing an article right now and instead I'm here. Then we should ban them from streets so that people have to pay attention to where they are going and the things going on around them. At that point we'd have something like functioning human beings again instead of mindless zombies. We could still have terminals for plugging into the Machine but our time with it should be regulated (like it already is with research clusters) so that we don't waste energy. There, the whole problem is solved and all it takes is a global butlerian jihad.

[–] tehciolo@lemm.ee 4 points 3 hours ago

Capitalism went so hard it fucked up its future workforce

[–] FreeWilliam@lemmy.ml 9 points 7 hours ago

I can confirm this is not just in the land of burgers. Back in the war from October to December, I fleed to Germany and went to school there, and the stuff I saw where absolutely disgusting: kids were using ipads (ibads) given to them by the school, the computers ran windows on them, and every time even a single task came up, they would directly resort to artificial unintelligence. When the "ceasefire" started and I finally went back to Lebanon, most of the kids were using Artificial unintelligence to write their essays as well. I don't blame these kids, they don't know better, they don't know how artificial unintelligence is trained from the stolen work of the people, they don't know what non-free software is, and they don't know how these devices/software are tracking their every move. It's up to the school's to teach them such and schools are doing a terrible job both in America and internationally.

[–] Chessmasterrex@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Prelude to the society Vonnegut wrote about in 'Player Piano' and Bradbury in 'Farenheit 451'

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 1 points 5 hours ago

And Isaac Asimov's The Feeling of Power, a short story about a man who can do mathematics in his head, a skill long forgotten after computers do all calculations for humanity.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 7 hours ago

basically idiocracy, in idiocracy, it was the AI supercomputer that was running the whole society for the 500years, it was assigning jobs, or removing jobs, or doing other stuff.

[–] boughtmysoul@lemmy.world 26 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

When I asked him why he had gone through so much trouble to get to an Ivy League university only to off-load all of the learning to a robot, he said, “It’s the best place to meet your co-founder and your wife.”

Yikes.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 10 points 16 hours ago

Where are these kids getting these ideas?

That only works if you're already fantastically wealthy.

[–] andxz@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 8 hours ago

Y'all are surprised?

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 52 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It's breathtaking how quickly the President of the United States and his good South African buddy can topple a superpower.

[–] CapriciousDay@lemmy.ml 23 points 20 hours ago

Don't worry they've defunded all of the bodies that might have compiled any fair statistics so they can deny the downfall for a few years.

[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 17 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (3 children)

Ah yes, goal misalignment at its finest.

The students need high grades to get a job, so they focus on ensuring that happens (AI use being the easy path).

The teachers have progression targets to meet, so they focus on ensuring this happens (keep the AI vulnerable assessments).

If you want to change a module as a teacher, good luck getting that work loaded when you should be implementing AI in your curriculum ^_^

[–] moseschrute@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

It’s kinda funny cause usually isn’t it the AI agent that has a misaligned goal? Like when I say don’t die, and it discovers that pausing Tetris technical means you never die. But now it’s students that have been given the wrong goal: pass the test by whatever means (e.g. use AI).

[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

That's the real joke behind it all, the use of AI is such a problem because we're turning education into a stamp dispenser - everyone needs an A* to get anywhere.

AI has given every student a path to this - however if industry stopped demanding that universities train their damn staff for them, and instead insist we teach their future staff how to be trained (as well as giving them subject specific knowledge), then we'd see the misalignment vanish. Once the need for an A* to land a good job is gone, then so is the misalignment.

[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 10 points 19 hours ago

If success is determined by a metric, the metric will go up. Any relation to actual increase in value is coincidental. Lol. Long ago someone tried to incentivize programers by giving abonus per bug fixed. Didn't last long before they blew through the bonus budget and realized the programers were putting in bugs so they could fix them. (Urban legend really... probably)

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

AI is bullshit and has no place in a school curriculum outside of computer science. Keep that shit away from children if you want them to have any critical thinking skills.

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

In practice you're right, and I'm not going to even try to argue the real life consequences AI has caused. However I disagree that AI doesn't have any place in the education system. Used on the appropriate problems, AI is a tool that makes a few things which were challenging to compute much easier. One example is large AI models folding proteins for medical research. A problem that took a computer a day or more to solve can be solved in hours on the same equipment using AI software. That's just one application that admittedly isn't useful to school aged children but it's still one useful example of AI. There are others. Students should be taught how to use AI properly, and part of that is teaching them what it's good at and what it'll never be able to do.

The part I get angry about is disgusting Tech Bro Billionaires trying to shove AI into every piece of software they can. Just like the block chain they're over promising and there's a bubble. Unlike block chain technology AI actually has a few useful applications and because of that it'll take a lot longer that BitCoin to finally level out.

[–] _g_be@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

The protein-folding ai is not the same as the generative ai.

It's really unfortunate that the conversation around AI lumps these different technologies together

Generative ai is a tool that must be used carefully else the kids will take the easy path.

[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world -1 points 9 hours ago

AI is probably the worst invention sense the atom bomb.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 16 points 22 hours ago

Yet they keep shoving it down our throats forcing us to delete entire systems to be rid of it

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 71 points 1 day ago (1 children)
  • Teachers are overworked, underpaid, some still using course work that hasn't been updated in years despite what the field has advanced
  • Students go into college due to the social expectation, some even unsure of what to get into as a career or even a class
  • Exceeding above the course requirements does nothing for your GPA, an A that got a "110%" and an A that got 90% are the same.
  • Students failing or passing still rack up debt for this social expectation
  • Teachers still failing to pay bills for this social need

Yeah AI is the fault here, its not the system at large been fucked over since Reagan.

[–] UntitledQuitting@reddthat.com 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Well yeah the education system is the burning tire fire and AI is tech bros pouring gasoline all over it

[–] crash_thepose@lemmy.ml 0 points 8 hours ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Imagine paying tens of thousands of dollars (probably of their parents saved money) to go to university and have a chatbot do the whole thing for you.

These kids are going to get spit out into a world where they will have no practical knowledge and no ability to critically think or adapt.

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Do you really think schools teach critical thinking and practical knowledge? State mandated education is geared to produce people who are smart enough to run the system and stupid enough not to question it. The fact that this dullard factory is being distrupted by what is essentially an electronic parrot speaks volumes about the whole charade.

[–] TwigletSparkle@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 22 hours ago

This was true before AI, it's just going to be 10x worse with AI

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

We’ve been needing to rework education for years now anyway. At least this will force the teachers to change & adapt, whether they like it or not.

[–] multifariace@lemmy.world 17 points 18 hours ago

Teachers are generally quite adaptable. We have asjustes for AI in our classrooms. We have adjuated to not teaching up to standards because we would be fined by our states for pushing some imaginary agenda. We have changed our entire curriculum the week before classes start because the County curriculum specialist had a bright idea.

The reality is that we have to navigate arbitrary law, we have to not do what's best for our classroom and teaching style because someone who hardly spent any time in a classroom thinks they know better. We have to do all this while being blamed for the behavior of students when their parents block the school phone numbers.

[–] DrollerCoaster@lemm.ee 5 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

The key concern with reforming social programs like public education is that they are ongoing concerns with impacts that extend decades into the future. "Creative destruction" in public education is liable to cause far more harm than good if the transition is not handled with knowledge and care.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›