this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
329 points (99.4% liked)

Programming

20280 readers
658 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An update from GitHub: https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/159123#discussioncomment-13148279

The rates are here: https://docs.github.com/en/rest/using-the-rest-api/rate-limits-for-the-rest-api?apiVersion=2022-11-28

  • 60 req/hour for unauthenticated users
  • 5000 req/hour for authenticated - personal
  • 15000 req/hour for authenticated - enterprise org
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] traches@sh.itjust.works 144 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Probably getting hammered by ai scrapers

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 week ago

The funny thing is that rate limits won't help them with genai scrapers

[–] potatopotato@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

Everything seems to be. There was a period where you could kinda have a sane experience browsing over a VPN or otherwise using a cloud service IP range endpoint but especially the past 6 months or so things have gotten worse exponentially by the week. Everything is moving behind cloudflare or other systems

[–] hackeryarn@lemmy.world 88 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If Microsoft knows how to do one thing well, it’s killing a successful product.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 29 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I came here looking for this comment. They bought the service to destroy it. It's kind of their thing.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

we could have had bob or clippy instead of 'cortana' or 'copilot'

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 15 points 1 week ago

Microsoft really should have just leaned into it and named it Clippy again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] midori_matcha@lemmy.world 68 points 1 week ago

Github is owned by Microsoft, so don't worry, it's going to get worse

[–] tal@lemmy.today 53 points 1 week ago (3 children)

60 req/hour for unauthenticated users

That's low enough that it may cause problems for a lot of infrastructure. Like, I'm pretty sure that the MELPA emacs package repository builds out of git, and a lot of that is on github.

[–] Xanza@lemm.ee 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

That’s low enough that it may cause problems for a lot of infrastructure.

Likely the point. If you need more, get an API key.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Do you think any infrastructure is pulling that often while unauthenticated? It seems like an easy fix either way (in my admittedly non devops opinion)

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago (4 children)

It's gonna be problematic in particular for organisations with larger offices. If you've got hundreds of devs/sysadmins under the same public IP address, those 60 requests/hour are shared between them.

Basically, I expect unauthenticated pulls to not anymore be possible at my day job, which means repos hosted on GitHub become a pain.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 45 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I see the "just create an account" and "just login" crowd have joined the discussion. Some people will defend a monopolist no matter what. If github introduced ID checks à la Google or required a Microsoft account to login, they'd just shrug and go "create a Microsoft account then, stop bitching". They don't realise they are being boiled and don't care. Consoomer behaviour.

Anti Commercial-AI license

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

I honestly don't really see the problem here. This seems to mostly be targeting scrapers.

For unauthenticated users you are limited to public data only and 60 requests per hour, or 30k if you're using Git LFS. And for authenticated users it's 60k/hr.

What could you possibly be doing besides scraping that would hit those limits?

[–] chaospatterns@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You might behind a shared IP with NAT or CG-NAT that shares that limit with others, or might be fetching files from raw.githubusercontent.com as part of an update system that doesn't have access to browser credentials, or Git cloning over https:// to avoid having to unlock your SSH key every time, or cloning a Git repo with submodules that separately issue requests. An hour is a long time. Imagine if you let uBlock Origin update filter lists, then you git clone something with a few modules, and so does your coworker and now you're blocked for an entire hour.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 week ago

60 requests per hour per IP could easily be hit from say, uBlock origin updating filter lists in a household with 5-10 devices.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sturlabragason@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

No no, no no no no, no no no no, no no there's no limit

https://forgejo.org/

[–] Xanza@lemm.ee 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Until there will be.

I think people are grossly underestimating the sheer size and significance of the issue at hand. Forgejo will very likely eventually get to the same point Github is at right now, and will have to employ some of the same safeguards.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Except Forgejo is open source and you can run your own instance of it. I do, and it's great.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

LOL!!!! RIP GitHub

EDIT: trying to compile any projects from source that use git submodules will be interesting. eg ROCm has more than 60 submodules to pull in 💀

[–] sxan@midwest.social 25 points 1 week ago (8 children)

The Go module system pulls dependencies from their sources. This should be interesting.

Even if you host your project on a different provider, many libraries are on github. All those unauthenticated Arch users trying to install Go-based software that pulls dependencies from github.

How does the Rust module system work? How does pip?

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

already not looking forward to the next updates on a few systems.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Crazy how many people think this is okay, yet left Reddit cause of their API shenanigans. GitHub is already halfway to requiring signing in to view anything like Twitter (X).

[–] plz1@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They make you sign in to use search, on code anyways.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Just browsing GitHub I've got this limit

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago

i've hit it many times so far.. even as quick as the second page view (first internal link clicked) after more than a day or two since the last visit (yes, even with cleaned browser data or private window).

it's fucking stupid how quick they are to throw up a roadblock.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ozoned@piefed.social 20 points 1 week ago

Wow so surprising, never saw this coming, this is my surprised face. :-l

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The enshittification begins (continues?)...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 week ago (19 children)

Open source repositories should rely on p2p. Torrenting repos is the way I think.

Not only for this. At any point m$ could take down your repo if they or their investors don't like it.

I wonder if it would already exist and if it could work with git?

[–] thenextguy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Git is p2p and distributed from day 1. Github is just a convenient website. If Microsoft takes down your repo, just upload to another system. Nothing but convenience will be lost.

[–] witten@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not entirely true. You lose tickets and PRs in that scenario.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] samc@feddit.uk 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The project's official repo should probably exist in a single location so that there is an authoritative version. At that point p2p is only necessary if traffic for the source code is getting too expensive for the project.

Personally I think the source hut model is closest to the ideal set up for OSS projects. Though I use Codeberg for my personal stuff because I'm cheap and lazy

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)

This going to fuck over obtanium?

[–] irelephant@programming.dev 13 points 1 week ago

Its always blocked me from searching in firefox when I'm logged out for some reason.

[–] varnia@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Good thing I moved all my repos from git[lab|hub] to Codeberg recently.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kevin____@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Good thing git is “federated” by default.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago (5 children)

THIS is why I clone all my commonly used Repos to my personal gitea instance.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have a question: why do lemmy dev keep using microsoft github?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›