this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
939 points (99.2% liked)

News

28963 readers
4335 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Luigi Mangione is accused of stalking United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson and shooting him to death on Dec. 4, 2024.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 minutes ago

Luigi is a hero. But not because he killed a CEO, or anyone. Because he was framed by the government, dragged through the mud, humiliated publicly, and held his head high standing 10 feet tall. Not guilty plea is nothing less than I expected. We should all take note of his example. They can't beat us all if we resist.

[–] johnpmac@lemm.ee 15 points 3 hours ago

“He who saves his country commits no crime “

[–] PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social 37 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

That kid didn’t do it. They are railroading him too hard and committing too many procedural violations for it to be anything but a setup.

Any normal case a judge would throw everything out for how prejudicial the state has behaved.

The face they don’t care how blatantly prejudicial they are shows they don’t care if he did it or not.

He didn’t do it.

The CEOs wife had hmm killed for meeting his side piece there.

The assassin was from El Salvador or something.

[–] Treetrimmer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

All the photos look exactly like him tho... I mean is there is substantial evidence he didn't do it? I fully support him, but I think it's a stretch to say he was framed and the photos look nothing alike

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 7 points 13 minutes ago (1 children)

Dude has a familiar face. There are tons of people that look "just like" those fuzzy videos and pics

[–] PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social 3 points 10 minutes ago

Could those photos be ai generated?

The only way we can be reasonably sure they are not is if we believe the prosecution is honoring their commitment to the constitution and acting in good faith.

I do not believe they are acting in good faith.

This means I have reasonable doubt on their entire effort.

Justice is dead.

[–] PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social 8 points 27 minutes ago

Innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt

The misuse of evidence and the lead detective and mayor sharing evidence his lawyer hasn’t seen in a media campaign to impugn the man.

There’s reasonable doubt in their earnest attempt at seeking justice here. They seem hellbent on violating his constitutional rights.

I doubt they have the right guy. Reasonably

[–] BrazenSigilos@ttrpg.network 3 points 8 minutes ago* (last edited 7 minutes ago)

There shouldn't need to be evidence of his innocence, there should need to be an overwhelming amount of evidence proving he's guilty. That's part of the foundation for justice that courts are meant to uphold.

Edit: mistype for spelling

[–] Uranus_Hz@lemm.ee 11 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

World needs fewer Elons and more Luigis

[–] tfm@europe.pub 3 points 17 minutes ago

The world needs no Elons at all

[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 34 points 11 hours ago

If the eyebrows don't fit, you must acquit.

[–] jaykrown@lemm.ee 37 points 12 hours ago

Good, honestly we don't even know if he's the person who did the crime.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 107 points 15 hours ago (2 children)
[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 63 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

He couldn't have done it! He was having a couple beers with me at the time that CEO died

[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 19 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I remember that night! He was buying rounds for the whole bar, what a great guy!

[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 minutes ago

I was at that bar too, great guy. I'll testify under oath.

[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 10 minutes ago

We all killed that ~~CEO~~ leech, on this blessed day

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 22 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

He should be acquitted specifically to make a point. A certain type of individual may or may not be safe if said person performs against the interest of their constituents.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] anas@lemmy.world 27 points 14 hours ago

He can’t have done it, I saw him on the day and I don’t live in the US. He’s telling the truth.

[–] GoodOleAmerika@lemmy.world 29 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Dude was with me in Bahamas

[–] clashorcrashman@lemmy.zip 16 points 13 hours ago

I was in the Bahamas and witnessed him being with you.

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 64 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I told you he didn't do it!

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 19 points 16 hours ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 87 points 17 hours ago (14 children)

Luigi Mangione is a hero of the people.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 35 points 15 hours ago

Nah he was just framed as one

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 12 points 13 hours ago

For no reason at all.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 26 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Proles_Uprising_Now@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

I was banned from reddit cause I supported him feel at home here

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 193 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Solidarity aside, whenever you are arraigned, any lawyer worth their salt will advise you to plead not guilty, because entering a guilty plea means it's over, move on to sentencing, where you have no leverage at all.

You can always change a not guilty plea to a guilty plea later, if a plea deal offered by the prosecution is acceptable to you. This is especially relevant in a case where the death penalty is on the table, but also applies to the possibility of reduced charges or penalties in any case.

I'll also add that this case could well end up with an Alford plea. In short, where the defendant asserts innocence, does not admit to the criminal act, but accepts the sentence because they believe that a jury would find them guilty based on the evidence. Again, this is definitely related to a case where the death penalty is on the table.

[–] thanksforallthefish 128 points 20 hours ago (16 children)

I'd be very disappointed in any jury who found him guilty

[–] jjagaimo@sh.itjust.works 95 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Having been on a jury,

People are dumb and have no empathy

[–] Palerider@feddit.uk 55 points 17 hours ago

~~Having been on a jury~~

People are dumb and have no empathy

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 7 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

also heard the smart ones get out of jury duty. i had a former colleague in an old job said she was chosen because she wouldnt speak for herself.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Charlxmagne@lemmy.world 24 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Realistically they'll try arrange one that will. They're going to try secure a guilty verdict by any means necessary to make an example out of him.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 70 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

Free this man. The wealthy psychopaths need something to be fearful of as it's the only emotional trigger that will keep their behavior from genociding the poor.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 124 points 20 hours ago (5 children)

He's guilty of stealing my heart tho

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›