this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
623 points (99.2% liked)

politics

22641 readers
3669 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

During Tuesday’s hearing, Gabbard told Warner that the Signal thread didn’t share any classified information but refused to share its contents, or even admit that she was on the chain.

“If it’s not classified, share the texts now,” Warner told Gabbard. “Share it with the committee. You can’t have it both ways. These are important jobs. This is our national security.”

Bitch, we can smell the bullshit 500 miles away.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 170 points 1 week ago (5 children)

IANAL, but because this was done on a third party encrypted chat app, doesn't it also violate the federal records act or something? If this was any other administration they would have been launched out of a cannon for that alone, not just the breach in security.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 109 points 1 week ago

Absolutely. Not to mention that organizing a fucking battle plan on a non-government communications system is fucking insane.

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 21 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I anal too, but I think as long as they do submit the conversion to the record which they now still can if it didn't self delete, then they're covered. They can also declassify all of it and say "see?" like Trump did with the classified documents he stole for Mar a Lago.

Signal isn't on an approved list, but the federal records act really just said there will be a council headed by an administrator or whatever to make rules and collect the records. So the current administrator, which could be a vacant seat or a MAGA Hat for all I know right now, would be in charge of this, and probably just hand it over to congress.

[–] Badabinski@kbin.earth 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The messages were set to auto-delete after a week, which imo reduces the likelihood that the messages will be recorded.

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Good thing there are screenshots by the reporter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

But the guy in the chat with them immediately informed them that he'd been in there, which gave them time to act

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

No, not for top secret stuff. That needs to be taken to official, secure channels.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm not personally into the idea of ANAL, but I like how its simultaneously not classified info, and also they've forbidden the journalist from sharing it further ...because its classified info.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I also ANAL. Those boys done fucked up but likely won't see consequences.

[–] MIDItheKID@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

"those boys done fucked up but"

Yes, this is ANAL

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Yes. Unless they forwarded them in a secure way immediately. Which there's like zero chance was the plan.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

That's why they're using Signal. If this while thing collapses on them, they don't want written records of their criminal conspiracies.

[–] Sibshops@lemm.ee 101 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Resign? They should be in jail. They used signal to get around FOIA laws.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 13 points 1 week ago

Right! Resigning is not enough! If a regular person leaked secrets they would face more damning consequences.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 76 points 1 week ago

"It's classified" is a nice catch-all excuse to use when you just don't want to answer for your actions.

Trump literally just got finished broadcasting and tweeting about flights that were deporting Venezuelans, topping it off with an "Oopise" taunt. But when he's brought in front of a judge and is expected to answer for that.......Sorry, classified. State secrets.

Trump's team talks about bombing the shit out of Yemen, then goes and bombs the shit out of Yemen. And is now trying to say they didn't talk about anything classified while talking about bombing the shit out of Yemen during a signal chat without even a hint of realization that the entire conversation was classified. Talking about impending war plans IS FUCKING CLASSIFIED BY DEFAULT YOU FUCKING CHODES

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago

Oh, are we "shredding" instead of "slamming" now? An even better idea: acting on it

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 20 points 1 week ago

Why? They LEARNED their Lessons! Unlike HILARYS EMAILS!

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

The Committee can always ask The Atlantic for the transcripts. I have no doubts they will hand them over.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 19 points 1 week ago

Every politician in that chat should be impeached. I know it won't remove them from office because the fucking Republicans lose even the pretext of ethics when one of their own is in trouble, but it should still be pushed to a vote.

[–] Punchshark@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago

Its funny because republicans clearly do not give a shit about the rules and will continue to do whatever they want. And the dems made little signs to show they are unhappy. All while murica has fallen!

[–] johncandy1812@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago

"Top democrats shout at wall."

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

No one's picking up the phone morons. It's time for pitchforks.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago

tulsi is doing what she is told by kremlin.

[–] peekingduck@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago

Why does tulsi choose to look like she steals Dalmatian puppies on the weekends?

load more comments
view more: next ›