this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
240 points (98.4% liked)

politics

20671 readers
3508 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Speculatively, Trump might use the Insurrection Act to impose martial law, citing false claims to justify military deployment.

Pentagon purges have removed officials who previously blocked his orders, raising fears of unchecked power.

Mass detention centers, like Leavenworth, could be repurposed for immigrants and dissenters, echoing Project 2025 plans.

Concerns grow over Elon Musk’s access to government AI, potentially aiding surveillance.

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LMurch@thelemmy.club 126 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

I'm thinking he's got to do something before the 2026 elections. If he loses the House and Senate by a lot, he could be impeached and removed. We don't have 4 years, we have 1.

Summer 2026 could really suck.

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 7 hours ago

We don't have 4 years, we have 1.

Seeing what happened the past 2 months I think it's way less than that

[–] Death__BySnuSnu@lemmy.world 18 points 13 hours ago

It's cute to think they'll allow us to vote fairly. After everything they've done, you know for a fact, they'll be going after all the democratic territories to make it impossible to have a fair election. If things are going to turn around, it definitely won't be peaceful.

[–] venotic@kbin.melroy.org 73 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

This is the same guy who has been impeached twice.

[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 47 points 17 hours ago (2 children)
[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 34 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

He wasn't. That was for the photo OP. His ear was perfectly fine the next day.

Yeah - considering his previous involvement with pro wrestling, I’m honestly pretty convinced that he simply got some color.

[–] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 13 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Just a little to more the right. Thanks to that republican, now the next guy has to shoot from 700m

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 21 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 95 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (3 children)

From the article...

The clock is ticking down on a crucial but little-noticed part of President Donald Trump’s first round of executive orders — the one tasking the secretaries of the Department of Defense and Department of Homeland Security to submit a joint report, within 90 days, recommending “whether to invoke the Insurrection Act.”

Always watch what the other hand is doing.

~This~ ~comment~ ~is~ ~licensed~ ~under~ ~CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0~

[–] RidgeDweller@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 hours ago

Hmm... I'm not in those departments, but I already have a conclusion for their report: if that happens, you will be assassinated.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 24 points 15 hours ago

That's Easter Sunday.

Perfect timing while everyone is chilling with family.

45 days today into the 90 if my math was right

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 72 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Trump just moved an entire Stryker brigade, vehicles and all, to the Mexican border.

I think the clearest way to declare himself President for Life, or at least grab a third term, is to invade ~~Iraq~~ Mexico for ~~WMDs~~ fentanyl, provoke a war, and bend everything in his favor in a system he's already fixed.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 38 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I can't quite put my finger on it, but this approach feels familiar 🤔

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 5 points 13 hours ago

I think it's what the Emperor did in Star Wars

[–] NimdaQA@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

The foolish orangutan wants to have Iraq on America’s doorstep.

As Critical Magazine states

“Invading Mexico to wipe out the cartels would effectively jettison everything America learned from our mistakes in the War on Terror. It would be costly, both in lives and treasure. It would be deeply unpopular — and it would fail.”

“For starters, the cartels are not mere gangs. The cartels effectively control chunks of Mexico and are in many ways ingrained into society there. They are not a separate external growth which can be lasered off with a well-aimed cruise missile: the infection has spread throughout the body. Wiping out the cartels would require our soldiers going door to door, house to house, waging war. This is not to even mention the massive cost of such an attack. A Harvard study found that the total cost of the Iraq War was about $3 trillion; we have no reason to think Mexico would be cheaper.”

As some guy on the internet stated:

“There are mountains in Mexico as tough as Afghanistan. Mexicans taking to the hills, like the Afghans, would give the US a constant headache until the Americans are thrown out. Remember, like the US, Mexico started as an insurgency. Every. Single. Mexican conflict has been asymmetrical guerilla warfare (heck, that’s what the drug war is in the first place, that’s why it’s so hard - now we’ve just multiplied the problem by sending the entire Mexican Army packing to the forests and mountains). That’s what Mexico knows best. And that’s a nightmare scenario for the US.”

The Mexican military has RPG-29s and the RPG-29 was considered so dangerous that the US refused to give M1 tanks to Iraqi security forces until years later and when they did, Iraqi M1s started to drop like flies.

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

To him it doesn't matter how foolish it is, how much money it would cost, or how many lives, Mexican or American, it would grind up. If it's a viable vehicle for him to consolidate emergency powers, rile up a fervent base, and become an American Emperor, he will take it.

It may start out relatively focused as a counterterror/counterinsurgency op...but once he pisses off the Mexicans enough for them to fight back, he'll have his casus belli (to his base) for open war. The unrestrained conservative order of battle will make the invasion of Iraq look positively pleasant. It was very common for war hawks back then to pine for the day we could just wipe Iraqi cities off the map and "let god sort them out". It'll be less Fallujah, more Gaza.

If he can get away with launching a Special Military Operation against the cartels and then Mexico as a whole, then Greenland and Panama are next. Then Canada. Then god knows who else. Maybe our war chest will bottom out by then, but that chest runs very deep.

[–] venotic@kbin.melroy.org 8 points 17 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 33 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

Did you happen to notice that GWB is not currently president or dictator? Like, yeah he was shitty, but he didn't participate in a violent attack on the nation's capitol. He didn't illegally try to get other states to "find him votes". He didn't participate in a fake elector scheme. He didn't say the 1st Amendment wasn't legal anymore. He didn't consider imposing martial law...

[–] thallamabond@lemmy.world 21 points 15 hours ago

Like, yeah he was shitty, but he didn’t participate in a violent attack on the nation’s capitol.

Not in DC, but in Miami many of his staffers were involved in a violent riot. The threat of violence was enough for them to suspend the counting of votes, and after a deadline passed, Bush won with a supreme court decision.

Bonus points for similarity, Roger Stone organized a violent protest (riot) with the explicit goal of stopping the counting of votes, for the benefit of republicans.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brooks_Brothers_riot

[–] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago

Yeah, he just killed a million Iraqis, nbd

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

Hanging chad supreme court determined victory says what?

[–] venotic@kbin.melroy.org -2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

You clearly didn't pay a single fraction of a thing that guy has done, obviously. He was more subtle with his crookedness.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 13 points 15 hours ago

Yes, W and his cronies were more subtle and worked more within the system. That's the criticism.

At the end of the day, even though W was a bad President, he still participated in the transition of power that this country has done previously. Trump tried to attempt a coup.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 21 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

We still had elections in those years and Iraq started during his first term. Parallels yes, but a brand new level of fucked up.

[–] TheObviousSolution@kbin.melroy.org 44 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Yes, obviously. He isn't just being dumb with the Canada and Greenland threats, he wants to provoke the circumstances to invoke the Insurrection Act. It's the easiest way to bypass midterms and elections. They know what they are doing is unpopular, they know they are only maintaining the veneer of having popularity. It allows political persecution of "traitors" and "propagandists". They aren't casually siding with Russia, Russian authoritarianism is their model. Hope Musk gets thrown out a rocket window to make room for someone more loyal and less overbearing on Trump, he's unpopular enough on both sides that it might actually be considered good PR by Trump.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 31 points 17 hours ago

Here is what our American oligarchs have to look forward to. That is, if it hasn't already happened. Is it worth it? You are not special and it won't be different for you.

Putin offered the oligarchs a deal: bend to my authority, stay out of my way, and you can keep your mansions, superyachts, private jets, and multibillion-dollar corporations (corporations that, just a few years before, had been owned by the Russian government).

In the coming years, the oligarchs who reneged on this deal and undermined Putin would be thrown into a Siberian prison or be forced into exile or die in suspicious circumstances. The loyalists who remained — and the new ones who got filthy rich during Putin's long reign — became like ATM machines for the president and his allies.

https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2022/03/29/1088886554/how-putin-conquered-russias-oligarchy

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 13 points 14 hours ago

He doesn't have to do shit to justify anything. He hasn't thus far.

All he has to do is say "I declare an insurrection" and the democrats will hem and haw while the republicans move in lock step. And the military will support him, just like they did last time.

Oh, wait, that pisses people off. Let me try again

The military will wait for orders from the POTUS to figure out what to do about the POTUS. SUPPORT THE TROOPS MOTHER FUCKERS!!!