this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
77 points (97.5% liked)

Canada

8019 readers
255 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The train is expected to use a newly built, separate electrified track and run frequently. In addition to Quebec City, Montreal and Toronto, it would serve Trois-Rivières, Laval, Ottawa and Peterborough.

Transport Canada initially estimated that the cost of a high-speed rail link between the two cities could be as high as $80 billion.

It's expected to take four to five years to design the future high-speed line. Funds are to be allocated at the end of that time period, so it's possible a future government could modify or cancel the project.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Funds are to be allocated at the end of that time period, so it's possible a future government could modify or cancel the project.

Oh, so it'll definitely get canceled.

[–] RandAlThor@lemmy.ca 14 points 4 days ago

Let's not elect PP then!

[–] bayesianbandit@lemmy.ca 25 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

This is one of the best initiatives I've seen from a government in a long-ass time. Such a railway would be a boon for our economy. As a Montrealer, the only thing I can say is I'm pissed it didn't already happen three decades ago.

$80 bn is chump change for something this critical. It will in the long run pay for itself via increased productivity and other benefits to our Canadian economy.

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 25 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Doug ford wants to spend 60billion on a tunnel under the 401 that would serve far far fewer people, drives me crazy that's even on the table.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 13 points 4 days ago

Local projects make corruption easier

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 days ago

Does he want fElon to dig it?

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 17 points 4 days ago

This would be amazing. Can we cancel Ford's ridiculous $60bn tunnel to fund this instead?

[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 15 points 4 days ago

this is exciting, won't happen unless they or NDP win the federal tho

[–] kowcop@aussie.zone 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

In Australia, wheeling out the β€˜high speed rail’ proposal means there is an election coming up..

[–] Chip_Rat@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

That is correct, not only an election, but the Liberals are currently having a leadership race. Then the asshat conservatives will vote no confidence and we will have to have an election and possibly follow the states into stupidity.

I'm really hoping the glow from the dumpster fire down south hits the conservatives up here and makes them think... Even if it's just for a moment. Hope is the word though....

[–] moody@lemmings.world 10 points 4 days ago

A high-speed rail line to serve half the country's population? Sorely needed, but not likely to happen.

[–] pedz@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago

Technically he announced a 5/6 years project of 3.9 billion for a study and a plan to have high speed rail. Nothing will get bought or built during that 5 year period. And I doubt anything will move faster once the study is over. Just add it to the pile.

No plans to ameliorate the current VIA Rail service in the meantime. This even kills the HFR plans that VIA proposed.

I'm so tired of those announcements. It's frustrating. I don't have a car now. I need to use VIA Rail now. I can't wait for 'Alto' in maybe 10 or 15 years. Intercity trains, or even buses, are abysmal in Canada. If they exist at all. And it will continue to stagnate or even degrade, while the governments will just keep announcing the same big project again and again and again.

[–] ClarkonRk@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I wish they would continue it through Guelph and London to Windsor.

[–] LostWon@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It'd be nice if they could eventually expand it across Canada.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

They'd probably have to branch it around Ottawa for that.

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 days ago

It's the plan, build Quebec -> Montreal -> Toronto and then extend it to Windsor

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] CanadianCorhen@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

i love Vancouver, and live near it, but we dont have the population or destinations that they have out east for this project.

[–] i_love_FFT@jlai.lu 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

We must think it backwards: building rails will bring population density.

If we wait for density to be high enough, the development will not have been planned for rails and it will be socially impossible to make people accept the demolition needed to build it.

[–] CanadianCorhen@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Fair enough, but we need to start where the density already is.

Once we have it here, and maybe have grown the expertise, we can grow the system.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

You can call me a dreamer but a transcontinental high speed rail would be excellent.

[–] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Vancouver doesn't need high speed intercity service, it needs to improve the existing sad excuse for a regional rail network