this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2025
184 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19656 readers
4616 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

A single Republican, Sen. Todd Gardenhire, R-Chattanooga, joined Democrats in voting against the measure, calling it a "dangerous precedent" to charge local officials for casting a vote.

Todd is going to get death threats. I'm calling it now.

[–] ZeroCool@slrpnk.net 58 points 1 day ago

The GOP supermajority in the General Assembly this week gave swift passage to the immigration enforcement law despite warnings from staff attorneys that the bill is "constitutionally suspect" in its unprecedented effort to curtail elected officials' voting decisions.

The constitution? Are we still pretending that old thing matters anymore? lol good joke.

[–] Alteon@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's fucked. That whole thing is fucked. Tennessee should be on fire over this shit.

[–] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

I wonder if they repealed their statute giving elected officials acting in official capacity qualified immunity.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

Pretty sure the 5 million is probably better spent on all sorts of things Tennesseans actually need.

Inbred fuckwits.

[–] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 12 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Do better Tennessee voters.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's gerrymandered to all hell. A federal court literally ruled it's gerrymandered along political, rather than racial lines, which makes it legal somehow.

TN-4, which includes the college town of Murfreesboro, used to lean blue, but they lumped it together with a bunch of rural areas going all the way out to East Tennessee and now it's one of the safest red seats in the country, held by a dirtbag domestic abuser.

Gov. Haslem may have been a corporate tool but at least he pushed back on some of the culture war bullshit. Ever since he retired, the far-right kicked into overdrive. They're all trying to outdo each other and the state government has no understanding of how the law even works. If an issue is mentioned on Fox News, a new law will be proposed about it within the week.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

My sister in law is a few months out from leaving that state.

Crippling poverty and isolation without education or services. She'd done aid work in africa and in afghanistan for years during the war. She says Tennessee is more hopeless.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 5 points 1 day ago

This what they WANT.

[–] tophneal@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

If we could do that, no one know Marsha blackburns name