this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
399 points (96.9% liked)

World News

39714 readers
2906 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump plans to lift the Biden administration’s freeze on supplying 2,000-pound bombs to Israel and reverse sanctions against Israeli settlers.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 36 points 12 hours ago (28 children)

hey pro-Palestinian lemmings! where y'all at?

this is why you wouldn't vote for Harris, right? when does he stop the killing again?

#when does it stop??

[–] FantasticDonkey@reddthat.com 2 points 3 hours ago

Palestinian here, not in the US. So Harris would have done genocide but without more 2000 pound bombs. Trump does it with them.

Your voters couldn’t decide against genocide, they could only decide with which weapons it will be continued. You guys have a problem.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (3 children)

Non American here. Both your parties are genocide and apartheid supporters. Simple as that.

Yea, one of the two is more than the other. But you got to come to terms with the fact that your country's bipartisan effect in the region is kinda evil.

Lol, down vote all you like. I'm just telling the truth.

[–] Slayan@lemmy.ca -1 points 13 minutes ago (1 children)

Your truth isn't THE truth buddy

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 minutes ago* (last edited 43 seconds ago)

Disprove me. Point me official policies enacted by one of the two US parties that materially opposed Israeli Apartheid and the genocide of Palestinians. To make sure I don't move the goalposts by claiming you cherry pick occasional bleeps, make a strong argument by showing me a consistent trend.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

You do realize the United States didn't start that war. They've done a lot to stabilize the region and they have tried to solve the issue both before and after the war.

You try and negotiate a deal between Israel and Palestine it's not an easy task.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

I never said they started the war. I said they support genocide and apartheid (and I should have added occupation). Which they do. You can argue all you like whether their reasons for doing it are good or bad, but the simple fact of the matter is that in a bipartisan way they support Apartheid Israel and its policies for genocide and occupation. That's just factual.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Everyone here agrees with you, dawg... We just understand our country's political system enough to know which was the correct choice to mitigate that evil.

People made the wrong choice.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 1 points 46 minutes ago* (last edited 43 minutes ago)

You know how we say that Israel is going to continue with apartheid and colonization even if Netanyahu is voted out? And that focusing too much on Netanyahu is sometimes a red herring because Israeli Apartheid is structural and a long term strategic goal of the Israeli establishment? Like, sure Netanyahu accelerates the process and does it shamelessly and publicly, but it's not as if the process had not been in full swing by both center-left and center-right governments before him, who massively expanded settlements and entrenched the occupation and settlements.

Same logic applies for the US support of Israeli Apartheid. Your system moves faster and more overtly when controlled by your fascist Right. But I'm not going to pretend that your non-fascist Center is not basically moving in the same direction.

Just because your political system puts a gun to your heads every four years, doesn't mean the rest of us have to buy into the same blackmail. (EDIT: we have other blackmails foisted on us by our own assholes thank you very much.)

[–] JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I'm here but I'm not United Statesian so I can't vote in your elections (even though US foreign influence is so aggressive it feels like I should have a say).

Oh no, I've upset some MAGA weirdos. Gonna lose sleep over that.

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] doctortofu@reddthat.com 61 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Wow, that's surely going to both get the price of eggs down AND stop the genocide of Palestinians! How does he do it?

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 25 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I mean there are two ways to stop the genocide. You can stop killing people or you can, how did he put it? "Finish the problem"

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 hours ago

It's called a "Final solution" and, yeah, multiple people in the Israeli Government talk about wanting a "Final solution for the Palestinian Problem".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee 13 points 12 hours ago

As it turns out, there are about 2,000 pounds of difference between Republicans and Democrats.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 94 points 19 hours ago (19 children)

Not to beat the dead horse but... Those who said "I won't vote Democratic because Gaza" were either lying or delusional.

In 2028 there won't be any Gaza, what will be the next line?

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

That's just self-indugent tribalist scapegoating using an argument which is circular and self-disproving.

  • If there were too few people who cared about the Israeli Genocide enough for it to affect the vote, which is would justify the decision of the Democrat leadership to not do anything meaningful to agree with the demands of those voters (Biden pausing his own decision of sending 2000lb bombs is very much a "I'm saving you from myself" moment), then you can't really blame those few people for the Democrat loss since there were not enought of them to make a difference and something else made the Democracts lose, so the fault is in the strategy followed by the Democrat leadership on other subjects.
  • If on the other hand there were so many people who cared about the Israeli Genocide enough for it to result in the Democrats losing the vote, why did the Democrat candidates not go after that vote? Again, the blame is down to the choices of the Democrat leadership: it's always easier to change what a handfull of people do than to change what millions do, so for the handful of people in the Democrat Party leadership to change their position with regards to supporting Israeli in its Genocide would be far more logical to expect in that scenario than for such a large slice of the electorate - millions of voters - to change their position instead. Even if one thinks "our leader's position is more important than that of millions of people so it's the millions who have to change their positions, not our leader" (a bootlicker's mindset, BTW), it's still incredibly stupid to go with "we're going to convince millions to change their position rather than just that one guy" as a strategy so the blame still rests with those who chose to go with it.

All I see here and now is people making a pseudo-"argument" that is entirelly reliant on the axiom that "the boss is always right" to manage to somehow blame millions for something which the "the boss" could have (per the part of that very same pseudo-"argument" which claims it was the people who were against the Israeli Genocide that sawyed the vote) easilly avoided by just meaningufully changing his position on just that one subject. That presumption that the leaders are blameless and it's the peons who are to blame for not being willing to follow the leaders no mater what they were doing, is a 100% subservient mindset.

If you're going to assign blame for Trump, look at the handful of people in the Democrat Party who chose to do things in such a way that the results was that millions of their own electorate chose not to vote for them, thus delivering the election to Trump.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 2 points 1 hour ago

Sorry, didn't pass the second line because you failed to understand what I say.

I'm not saying Biden is good for Gaza. I'm saying if your concern is Gaza, Trump is not better. So for a meaningless virtue signaling, everything else is worse.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 hours ago

And the gold medal for mental gymnastics goes to...

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

One way to end a genocide is to 100% the ethnic cleansing.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 1 points 28 minutes ago

Yeah, but when do they ever stop at just one group? When the Nazis started running low on Jews to scapegoat, they expanded their operation to include gays, gypsies, handicapped...etc.

[–] splinter@lemm.ee 44 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

This is the tragic truth.

The most frustrating part about it is that withholding votes was framed as a principled position. And I’m sorry, but that’s asinine. How many of those people who declared that they wouldn’t vote for the democratic ticket because of their action/inaction on Gaza actually did anything more than posting rants on social media? How many raised funds for aid? How many organized rallies, protests, or educational outreach? How many even so much as contacted their representatives?

It is either naivety or complacency to believe that national policy should change just because you and your friends sent around some memes. And it is callous indifference to base your vote on a single issue and then claim that you’re inhabiting the moral high ground.

If you yell into the void, you shouldn’t expect a response. And if you believe in an issue, either take action or acknowledge that it would be staggeringly arrogant to expect other people to put in work that you yourself won’t do.

[–] clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

The American non-Republican voters were played like a fiddle. Long live Tik Tok who fed the indignation and enabled Trump's victory!

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Whoa whoa "Genocide Joe" where did you come from where did you go, where did you come from "Genocide Joe."

Crickets

[–] FolknForage@lemm.ee 27 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I am just here waiting for the “Free Palestine” folks to show us the way with some real radical activism.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 200 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (86 children)

Well, would you look at that, third-party protest voters / abstainers / "undecideds": you saved Palestine. /s

load more comments (86 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›