this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2025
739 points (97.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

6162 readers
2159 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

I'm living in a city with a housing situation that's fucked even if you have a halfway good income, and my lease will end this year.

I am lucky enough to have a safety net of friends and family, but if I didn't, I could very much face homelessness this year, as someone who's employed, and "functioning" in the eyes of society.

Sometimes I have half a mind to go to spend the rest of my existance in some remote monestary, but I feel I am not quite religious to the necessary degree. Or at all.

[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Does somebody to actually say that? I'd like to ask whether somebody worth listening to is actually saying that, but in this place that filters out way too many people.

[–] callyral@pawb.social 12 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

If homelessness was a choice, no one would be homeless because why would someone choose to be homeless?

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I have a friend who chose it. Had a job with early retirement pension, was buying a house he could afford. They made a minor adjustment to his contract and he snapped, quit the job, abandoned the mortgage and let the house go back to the bank, and took his son and moved to California to live in his car. Ten years later he's still doing that. He works occasionally as a delivery driver when he feels like it.

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

When you only are responsible for yourself this is a legit thing in my eyes. If this is the life he prefers and he is happy, go ahead.

Doing this when you have a child is an irresponsible asshole move in my opinion. You are forcing your child into a live that just can't be as healthy for them, physically and mentaly, then a more secure setting (that he had before) would be.

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 1 points 6 hours ago

Yeah I agree on both sides. His son is an adult now and still lives a life much like his dad. It's too bad he was raised in that situation. When I call him a friend, he's really just one of the few high school friends I've kept in touch with. We live far from each other but we say hi online a couple times a year and we had lunch together about a year ago when I was in California for a wedding.

[–] Entropywins@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Being a free range human has its perks...it's the way we are meant to be

[–] Soulg@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago

There actually is a very small group of people who do it willingly. Emphasis on very small

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 14 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I am disgusted that poverty continues to be considered a failing of the individual when it should in reality be considered a failing of the group, and that group is America as a whole.

Seriously, do other countries struggle with homelessness anywhere near this badly?

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 1 points 6 hours ago

In Germany we have had a significant rise in homelessness lately. Hompless people are present in every city. France feels very much the same when I visit. Britain has loads of them.

We as a group maybe is not just US-Americans after all, but the minority world (the "West") as a whole.

It's a systemic issue, that is for sure. It just not on my the US system that is fucked. Maybe a bit more fucked, as Homelessness is more widespread that in Europe. But defenetly not exclusive to the US.

[–] Zeddex@sh.itjust.works 6 points 14 hours ago

Yes. Parts of Canada have serious homelessness problems and many cities like mine like to pretend we don't. Our mayor routinely gets the police involved to relocate them and then is just like see problem solved!

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago

will smith burned a town to the ground with a single hadouken and it's still going

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 14 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

It is a choice though, a choice by the oligarchs and policy makers who run this shit show of a planet. It just isn't a choice on behalf of the people who are actually suffering.

[–] WhatSay@slrpnk.net 3 points 14 hours ago

Homeless increased 18% last year, 13% in 2023. Source: AP news

[–] sudo42@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

There’s still time to donate to Trump’s inauguration fund in order to get federal disaster relief.
/s

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago (2 children)
[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

it- it understands dark humour and sarcasm? huh

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 2 points 16 hours ago

Can't read that

[–] Librarian@lemm.ee 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yes, My friend,

When I was homeless,

I had “chosen” to be disabled,

“chosen” to live in a country where applying for benefits takes years,

“chosen” to live in a country where healthcare costs weren’t covered after I lost my job,

“chosen” to live in a country where the landlord’s profit was more important than my survival.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 18 points 23 hours ago

It's still a choice.

It's just not a choice you made.

[–] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 82 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It is a choice. An intentional policy choice. Made by our government on behalf of an oligarchy of parasitic oxygen thieves who should all be killed.

But most of yall aren't ready for that discussion.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 10 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Ooh. Me, me, me.... I am.

The government doesn't work for you. You vote then in, sure, but they work for the lobbyists of large corporate interests.

Any policy you want will only pass if the corporations want it to, or they don't believe it will make a substantive difference in their ability to exploit your labor for profit, and take from you every dime, nickel, and dollar they can. They'll only keep you happy enough to not revolt, and beyond that, you're entirely fucked from all angles.

[–] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 19 hours ago (6 children)

But most of yall aren’t ready for that discussion.

Do you know where you are

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The government isn't a monolith.

Yes, there are oligarchs influencing policies that make a standard of living hell on earth.

There are also great people within the government who are actively trying to improve the state of things.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

it's all about possession of power. the good people working for the feds have to do their good work despite their bosses handing our value over to the greedy parasites

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

No, it’s all about who possesses money. Corporations got $100 against every one of your puny worthless votes.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

money is the measurable possession of power

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Not necessarily. Power and money are often hand in hand, but power can exist without money.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 1 points 11 hours ago

exactly. but money can't exist without power. money only represents an accumulation of value stolen through violence

[–] Arbiter@lemmy.world 127 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It’s a choice, just not a choice made by the homeless.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 42 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Your home, some billionaire’s choice.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 88 points 1 day ago (7 children)

If it's a legitimate fire, the house has ways of shutting that whole thing down

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You saw how that house was decorated. It was asking for it.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

Those hedges were quite flammable. It was bound to happen.

[–] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 14 points 1 day ago

jesus... slow clap with deeply disgusted look on face i had all but mercifully forgotten about that

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

Also: all of the other times it isn't.

Say, 95%.

BOOTSTRAPS, PEOPLE. BOOTSTRAPS!

[–] lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As some ~~wise~~ famous guy once said: Just sell your house and move!

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Sell to who Ben? A fucking dragon?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] verdigris@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 day ago (8 children)

I don't love the implication that those displaced by disaster are somehow different than "normal" houseless people, though I'm sure that wasn't the intent behind the meme.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›