this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2025
585 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

60294 readers
4129 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

ETA: Paywall bypass link: https://archive.is/vyU15

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] notannpc@lemmy.world 238 points 4 days ago (7 children)

God our government is so fucking useless for anything that might actually help people.

[–] Juigi@lemm.ee 50 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 20 points 4 days ago

It's by design: the rich know how easily "representatives" can be bought.

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

this is a direct consequence of the Supreme Court overturning the Chevron deference back in June. the appeals court has to apply the law. so you know who to blame.

expect more cases like this in coming years...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 22 points 4 days ago (5 children)

It's currently not fill with people who want to help "prople". It currently is setup to help corporate America only at this point. At the expense of your rights.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago (2 children)

God our government is so fucking useless for anything that might actually help people.

More specifically: gop.gov

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 149 points 4 days ago (5 children)

If the FCC can't regulate anything I guess I'll just run a high power jammer and block all cell signal in the area.

[–] westyvw@lemm.ee 38 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Wait! You will get in trouble for that. Instead you need to have an LLC that does that for Profit somehow. Then all is forgiven!

[–] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's a privacy subscription service.

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

Privacy? You can't have privacy.

It's to block access to CSAM. Shame it blocks everything else.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Put hundreds of them in a pretty boxes, form an LLC, get a few VCs to sign on, flip the switch, then charge a monthly fee to "open previously-inacessible service areas to cellular customers" and you'll have a successful startup!

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Ah but technically it's still illegal to disrupt emergency services and also leaves you liable to lawsuits.

But yeah, the FCC in particular can't stop you from doing that.

[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 18 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Ahh, but you can subscribe to my private emergency services on my own frequencies which aren't blocked, then nobody can block mine because they are the only available emergency service frequency.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago

Hold on, GumpyDuckling... checks clipboard tsk tsk, I see here you're not wealthy enough to effectively lobby to get us in trouble; I'm afraid that'll be a $10,000 fine.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 264 points 4 days ago (8 children)

Amazing how much the US judiciary branch seems to hate the plebs.

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 97 points 4 days ago (51 children)

Republicans have spent the last 40 years purchasing the entire system, obviously it works for them. They're the ones that paid for it.

load more comments (51 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 93 points 4 days ago

Note that it piggybacks on the SCROTUS decision earlier about preventing government from protecting anything from industry.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

at least we got actual consumer protection under biden’s FTC’s lawsuits and stuff…

edit: FTC, not FCC

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 31 points 4 days ago

They will be promptly rolled back under President Musk

We are losing big time with each successive administration since Congress will never legislate in favour of the working class.

Relying on regulatory agencies for customer protection just creates endless opportunity for corpos to challenge anything favourable to the peasants.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 140 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Their excuse is that telecom services aren’t actually providing telecom services, but information services.

If that doesn’t make sense to you, it’s because you aren’t brain-damaged.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 43 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Courted reclassified the services to remove FCC ability to regulate telecos?

Talk about bad faith behavior.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blackout@fedia.io 131 points 4 days ago (1 children)

All laws protecting the people's interests are now banned. Don't like it? Well become a billionaire and maybe the supreme Court will care

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 4 days ago (7 children)

otoh:

Mike Masnick @mmasnick.bsky.social‬

I mean, this is a terrible (if unsurprising) decision, but I'm left wondering how Brendan Carr is going to still try to claim regulatory authority over social media companies...

There is no possible consistency between "ISPs can throttle and block, but edge services cannot..." ‪nilay patel‬ ‪@reckless.bsky.social‬

2h

Sixth Circuit decision striking down net neutrality doesn’t even remotely pass the sniff test lol www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf...

January 2, 2025 at 3:11 PM

https://bsky.app/profile/mmasnick.bsky.social/post/3lerv476tes22

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 69 points 4 days ago (4 children)

They're going to use this for censorship.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 25 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Torproject.org. There's absolutely no way to censor the entire internet, short of entirely disconnecting the internet.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 28 points 4 days ago (2 children)

But they'll call it freedom of speech. Speech someone/corp paid for of course, but Citizens United...

[–] GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Corporations are just sovereign citizens.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 89 points 4 days ago (15 children)

comes a time when blue states just need to draw the line and flat out refuse to follow federal laws and judges until federal judges stop being corrupt.

[–] w3dd1e@lemm.ee 46 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They do it for marijuana laws but won’t treat anything else like that. I don’t understand.

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 28 points 4 days ago

Money.

Lots of potential tax revenue with cannabis.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 22 points 4 days ago

You say "secede" funny.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 68 points 4 days ago (10 children)

long-winded sigh

I really ought to set up that community meshnet I keep thinking about setting up...

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] db2@lemmy.world 45 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Is this really shocking with the incoming sadministration?

That's not a typo.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 35 points 4 days ago (2 children)

In its opinion, a three-judge panel pointed to a Supreme Court decision in June, known as Loper Bright, that overturned a 1984 legal precedent that gave deference to government agencies on regulations.

“Applying Loper Bright means we can end the F.C.C.’s vacillations,” the court ruled.

"Nyyeaahh nyyeaah nyyeaaaahh ppffthhhhthhth!!" they said.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 25 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Like most large changes, it requires an act of Congress. Doing these via the executive leads to weak outcomes like this.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 54 points 4 days ago (3 children)

The thing is Congress doesn't have time to deal with technical details. That's why they passed a law authorizing the FCC to make exactly this kind of regulation. The conservative courts throwing everything they don't like under the Major Questions Doctrine is just a way to make sure regulation never happens and Corporations are free to exploit people however they want. The problem here isn't the FCC, it's bad faith judges with the power to stop the entire government.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 23 points 4 days ago (19 children)

This is ridiculous how difficult it is to get this law through. Clearly it must be something good. I am 100% behind it.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)

tbf it's not hard to convince hayseed chucklefuck trumplings that regulations which exist to protect them are a bad thing because they cost money. we had condo buildings collapsing and people dying WITH regulations.

when bridges start collapsing left and right, they'll blame drag queens and the maga trumpistan patriots will lap it up like hogs at the trough

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›