this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
868 points (95.6% liked)

Memes

1492 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.one 93 points 2 years ago (2 children)

"We're trying to create a safe and loving home."

"Wow, so what you're saying is you won't love me if I come in and release millions of angry wasps in your home? Have fun in your echo chamber, I guess."

[–] seahorse@midwest.social 61 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"Just because you disagree that minorities should be wiped off the face of the earth doesn't mean you have to cancel me"

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

"Why can't we just meet in the middle and wipe half the minorities off the planet?"

[–] 520@kbin.social 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Easy there, discount Thanos

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Maybe we should start an equally extreme movement on the left so that the centrist actually know what the centre is supposed to be.

"Minorities should be our supreme leaders, that enslaves the majority"

[–] reverendsteveii@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 years ago

This is, unironically, what they tell one another we believe

[–] norbert@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

It's getting to this point. The left need to start arming themselves and agitate for what we want. The over the decades the right-wing shifted right. To counter this the democratic party shifted right as well in an attempt to court the "undecided" voters.

This has failed spectacularly and they just alienated their actual base. Now the country has shifted right and the true leftists are left with little to no representation.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

If you take a look at global demographics, that's already happened.....

[–] aberrate_junior_beatnik@midwest.social -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We should all admit that both sides have a point. Let's all try to break out of our echo chambers.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Mostly because the echoing screams of suffering are getting a hit too loud in this chamber.

"In our latest innovation, we have added sound baffling to the echo chambers. The upshot is now people can hear themselves and nothing else, as requested. This helps narcissists keep out of others way and let people get on with their lives... What's the downside, you ask? Oh.... Well, the downside is that everyone else is predicted to suffer psychosis. Well, predict to suffer it 62% faster than now..... Anyways, mission accomplished!" /s

[–] JBloodthorn@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I just heard your username in my head. >_>

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.one 6 points 2 years ago

Mission accomplished!

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 63 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They appeal to tolerance because we value it, not because they do. Once they have power they won’t practice the tolerance towards differences in opinion they demand.

[–] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Once they have power they won’t practice the tolerance

Well duh. They don't even pretend to practice tolerance when they don't have power.

[–] Dadifer@lemmy.world 45 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm just going to leave this in case someone needs to see it for the first time. Paradox of Tolerance

[–] a1mlezz@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No paradox once you stop viewing tolerance a principle and start viewing it as a social contract; only those that keep it are covered by it.

[–] Fract@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

I really like this take, I'm going to steal it.

[–] Seudo@lemmy.world 41 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them.—In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be most unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant.

The Paradox of Tolerance,
Karl Popper,
1945.

[–] rustyricotta@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

Wonderful quote, but curse my brain for reading "Karl Popper" as "Carl Pappa"

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

It's worth noting that what Karl Popper most likely meant by intolerance is something like "forbid their followers to listen to rational argument ... teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols" rather than any broader meaning of the term, and is here explicitly giving credit to the value of rational debate.

[–] Seudo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Yep, I think the irony of this post is lost on some people.

[–] spiderjuzce@lemmy.sdf.org 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

"tHaT's NoT vErY tOLeRaNt"

"Why thank you for noticing"

[–] RIP_Cheems@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Deus vult for me to find a nazi and kill them with a 950 jdj

[–] Fickle_Ferret@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 years ago

Preach, funny little rocket man.

[–] Limitless_screaming@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's a pretty interesting mustache in the first panel.

[–] yumpsuit@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Michael Jordan would’ve had greater success taking back the toothbrush mustache if he carried a rocket launcher.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

WORMS and killing MAGATS

a paring I didn’t know I needed

[–] nick@midwest.social 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh shit I didn’t get that this was worms. Man, there is a blast from the past.

I don’t know if it’s from WORMS but the over exaggerating weapons with the worm like head coming from the ground only bring me to that conclusion

[–] soviettaters@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago

This is why I have no sympathy for Tankies. Their ideology has caused the death of tens of millions and we should not allow that to happen again just for the sake of "tolerance".

[–] transigence@kbin.social -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is the dumbest stra-man circle-jerk fart-sniffing hate-porn I've seen yet here. Nazis don't exist — they are a figment of the past. Neither do the caricature archetypes of the commentariat.
The most offensive part isn't even the blatant lies, it's the laziness. This 2-minutes is just so Goddamn unbelievably lazy.

[–] seahorse@midwest.social 2 points 2 years ago

Hold this ban my guy.