this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2024
82 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19244 readers
2253 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
outrageousmatter@lemmy.world
aidan@lemmy.world
jordanlund@lemmy.world
HLMenckenFan@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
82
Analysis: John Roberts leads the charge to uphold bans on trans care (www.cnn.com)
submitted 3 weeks ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Summary

The Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice John Roberts, appears poised to uphold Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care for minors, signaling a pivotal moment for transgender rights.

Roberts, citing state authority over medical decisions, compared the case to his 2015 dissent in Obergefell v. Hodges, where he opposed judicial intervention on same-sex marriage.

Conservative justices emphasized minimal judicial scrutiny, while liberal justices, including Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, warned of harm to transgender youths.

The case underscores broader tensions over constitutional protections versus legislative authority in regulating trans rights.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LookBehindYouNowAndThen@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

In Nazi Germany, transgender people were prosecuted, barred from public life, forcibly detransitioned, and imprisoned and killed in concentration camps. Though some factors, such as whether they were considered "Aryan", heterosexual with regard to their birth sex, or capable of useful work had the potential to mitigate their circumstances, transgender people were largely stripped of legal status by the Nazi state.

The GOP court will be following reactionary tradition.

This is what Make America Great Again means: persecution of the people they hate.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Male Aryan Gestapo Alliance

MAGA is just another word for NAZI

I don't care what anyone says. They are the same.

A MAGA is a NAZI. A NAZI is a MAGA.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yep. That's what I've been saying since about 2015. Anyone putting on one of those fucking hats might as well be donning some SS gear.

I DGAF what the centrists and the Tone Police say.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

With this supreme court it was never going to go any other way.

This is the price of Trump's first term. God only knows how high the cost of his second will be.

[–] Diva@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 weeks ago

So glad the Democrats upheld norms instead of doing shit to stop this

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I am an outsider. People need to move. If your community is actively hostile towards you, then you should relocate. I get that its 'home' but the environment change may be just as beneficial as surgery. I don't know shit but I want people to be safe and happy. These states need to be ghosttowns with no young people. No women. Just a bunch of elderly, truck drivers and welders wondering where all their caregivers went.

[–] hedgehogging_the_bed@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

This is the US supreme Court so there's nowhere for us to go. No country on Earth takes refugees from the US. That's what was so cool about the US once upon a time in history, it was the one place you could go, that provided an option if your birth country was hostile.

Now that the US is hostile to its own people, there's no country to go to.

[–] actually@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s still much much much better to be in some states than others. It’s also far easier to move now while there is still freedom of interstate movement. It may not get so bad, but why make any assumptions?

[–] hedgehogging_the_bed@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I agree, it's better is some states than others -right now-. But any state you move to has the chance that it will elect a GOP governor and legislature and become the next bad place. I don't see a single state in the nation that is so blue that it is guaranteed to stay that way for the foreseeable future. Unlike abortion, no state has trans-rights in their constitution.

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Just look at NYC. Our governor is absolutely useless and our mayor is a Trump loving traitor under investigation by the FBI

Though we do have trans rights in our constitution now

[–] actually@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

A good way to tell the long term future of a state is to see how ballots are counted, and if the published stats pass United Nations tests for fair elections.

Most states flunk, some pass, it’s been a few years since I last checked, so I’m not going to give potentially bad info. But it falls down to what one might suspect, more blue states pass than red states

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

California, the issue here is with the state, not the country as a whole. Their are much more friendly states to live.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 3 weeks ago

Easy to say, impossible for most to do.