this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
277 points (90.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

32557 readers
129 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Python allows programmers to pass additional arguments to functions via comments. Now armed with this knowledge head out and spread it to all code bases.

Feel free to use the code I wrote in your projects.

Link to the source code: https://github.com/raldone01/python_lessons_py/blob/main/lesson_0_comments.ipynb

Image transcription:

from lib import add

# Go ahead and change the comments.
# See how python uses them as arguments.

result = add()  # 1 2
print(result)
result = add()  # 3 4
print(result)
result = add()  # 3 4 5 20
print(result)

Output:

3
7
32
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 17 points 1 day ago

Why is this a thing

[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 day ago

Thanks, I hate it.

[–] aliser@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

bro what we are devolving

[–] drathvedro@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hate this shit being routinely used in PHP. Symfony uses those functional comments for routing, essentially scanning every controller file as text on every visit, to gather the url patterns above functions. Laravel uses Reflection, which is functionally the same thing, to provide arguments to controller functions. Also, kind of related, the project I'm working now has few functions that use backtrace to return different results based on where they are called from. It is indeed very cursed and I'm ripping out any usages of them whenever I see one.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Comment Annotations were a nessecary thing as php did not support a native way to do it. However, since php 8, there is now native attributes.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

That is C++ levels of "why the fuck did they add that."

[–] infinite_ass@leminal.space 4 points 1 day ago

The best language is complete, succinct, orderly and clear. And never adds a single goddamn thing ever.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 2 days ago

This is heresy.

[–] HStone32@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago

This is an affront to nature. Comments shouldn't even make it past the scanner.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 194 points 3 days ago (14 children)

IMO comments should never ever be parsed under any circumstances but I probably don't know enough to really speak on this

[–] jaxxed@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can we just clarify that you mean that comments should never be parsed by the language engine. There are valid annotation systems, but the goal is alway to ensure that one passable can never impact the other.

Imagine if here a comment could create a syntax error! This is even worse for runtime scripting languages like python.

[–] bastion@feddit.nl 7 points 1 day ago

Sure, but let's just clarify that this is someone going out of their way to create this problem, using Python's ability to read it's own code.

Basically, you can load any text file, including a source code file, and do whatever you want with it.

So, a function can be written that finds out whatever's calling it, reads that file, parses the comments, and uses them as values. This can also be done with introspection, using the same mechanism that displays tracebacks.

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This isn't standard python. lib is not in the standard library. Python also doesn't have any special variables where it stores comments, other than __doc__ which stores a docstring. If I had to guess, add is reading the file/REPL via __file__.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Is __doc__ storing a comment or just a text string?

[–] Artyom@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

It's a string, although sometimes Python conflates the two. The recommended way to make a multi-line comment is to just make a multi-line string and just don't use it.

[–] jedibob5@lemmy.world 85 points 3 days ago

No, your intuition is correct, this is extremely cursed.

[–] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 55 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

Seen in a code review (paraphrased):

image of a program which is estimating the size of an array by counting how many lines of source code were used to construct it

"Why does this break when you add comments in the middle?"

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Rooki@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Comments should be removed before shipping.

[–] lud@lemm.ee 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Python is an interpreted language but for a compiled language absolutely (and obviously).

[–] Rooki@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I guess there could be just a script before deployment.

[–] raldone01@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Well now that causes breakage two dependencies down the line. Good luck with that. 😅

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] would_be_appreciated@lemmy.ml 63 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I assume the people freaking out about how dumb python is didn't bother to read the code and have never coded in python in their life, because the behavior here is totally reasonable. Python doesn't parse comments normally, which is what you'd expect, but if you tell it to read the raw source code and then parse the raw source code for the comments specifically, of course it does.

You would never, ever accidentally do this.

...you'd also never, ever do it on purpose.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

yeah frankly this post is borderline misinformation, they specifically import a library to read comments as arguments, it's like redefining keywords in C and complaining about C being dumb

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm going to say it just is misinformation, if that's what "lib" is here.

[–] bastion@feddit.nl 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah. 'lib' isn't a standard Python library, it's the name of the abomination that this person created. Since python has quite a bit of useful introspection, they can do something like:

  • get the stack
  • find the exact call to abomination.add()
  • reparse the text of that line, turn the text of the comment into actual numbers, and add them

Now, I don't know if python keeps the comments around, so it may involve getting the filename and line number, reading the file, and manually extracting the comment text from that line.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's not even actually called lib. The line just straight up isn't in the image "transcribed", and it's from arglib import comment_arguments in the original code.

Yeah, I gave this one a downvote.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 38 points 3 days ago

They chose violence.

[–] arisunz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 74 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I fucking hate this, thanks OP

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MrPoopyButthole@lemmy.world 87 points 3 days ago

That's disgusting

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 82 points 3 days ago (2 children)

checks the community to make sure I'm in programmer humor

Yeah that checks out

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] RichardoC@lemmy.world 66 points 3 days ago

Thank you, I hate it

[–] shotgun_crab@lemmy.world 41 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is some javascript level shit

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 day ago

It's actually kind of nice to see this as a JS developer.

Not like, "Oh wow this is neat!"

But like, "Finally the golden child, Python, also has some fucked up shit"

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 48 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 26 points 3 days ago

Yup, the function actually goes and finds the code that calls it and parses the comment.

Disgusting.

[–] doeknius_gloek@discuss.tchncs.de 44 points 3 days ago (4 children)

This does not actually work, right? Right?

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago

they have to import a separate library to do this, it's not a part of standard python, and this post is basically just misinformation

[–] justcallmelarry@lemmy.dbzer0.com 50 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (6 children)

The add() function (that is available in the source code) basically uses some built in debugging tools to find out where in the code the function is called, and then parses the comment from the file and uses it for adding stuff.

I’ve never tried (becuse why would you…) but something similar can probably be built in any interpreted language

It’s not something Python does by design

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

Every day further from god's light etc...

[–] embed_me@programming.dev 31 points 3 days ago (5 children)

As if I needed more reasons to start away from python

[–] Chais@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 days ago

You can so stupid shit in any language. I admit Python doesn't exactly make it difficult. A bit like JS, but different.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] LolaCat@lemmy.ca 30 points 3 days ago

I feel sick

load more comments
view more: next ›