this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
97 points (97.1% liked)

politics

19102 readers
3301 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

G.O.P. lawmakers whose leaders have pressed to roll back transgender rights around the country moved to bar Sarah McBride, the first transgender member of Congress, from women’s rooms on Capitol Hill.

In Washington this week for new member orientation, Ms. McBride was still sitting through mandatory cybersecurity trainings, setting up her payroll, selecting district offices and learning how to introduce a bill when her new Republican colleague, Representative Nancy Mace of South Carolina, announced plans to introduce a measure to bar transgender women from using women’s restrooms and changing rooms in the Capitol complex.

Ms. Mace did not try to pretend that she was doing anything other than targeting one individual with her resolution, even though it would apply to all employees and officers of the House.

“Sarah McBride doesn’t get a say,” she told reporters on Monday night. “I mean, this is a biological man.” She said that Ms. McBride “does not belong in women’s spaces, women’s bathrooms, locker rooms, changing rooms — period, full stop.”

MBFC
Archive

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 1 points 33 minutes ago

I really hope this backfires and creates a wave of support for McBride.

Kinda like their attempts at attacking AOC just made her more popular.

[–] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 11 points 3 hours ago

Counter with tabling a bill to make the bathrooms all gender neutral.

If the cunts are gonna be counts, at least force em to keep admitting it out loud so people keep seeing it.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 53 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Do I have understand her position correctly?

Trans woman in locker room....no

sex offender as AG....yes

rapist as POTUS....AOK!

[–] Tramort@programming.dev 6 points 3 hours ago

They want to make sure the trans woman is in their bathroom because they fantasize about it.

This is creepy AF

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 28 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

the party of "gun control laws only hurt law abiding citizens" insists that bathroom laws are about protecting people and not about deliberately hurting law abiding citizens

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 0 points 31 minutes ago

From the people who say "No Gun Signs won't stop guns!" comes "Women Only Signs will stop Sex Predators."

Even though most sex predators are white cismen and transwomen are more likely to be preyed upon than to do the preying...

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 45 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (3 children)

“Sarah McBride doesn’t get a say,” she told reporters on Monday night. “I mean, this is a biological man.” She said that Ms. McBride “does not belong in women’s spaces, women’s bathrooms, locker rooms, changing rooms — period, full stop.”

What a cunt. And for the first time in a very, very long time, I do not mean that in the jocular, gender-neutral Scottish way. I mean it in the mean, American way. Including this time, I can still count the number of times on one hand that I've used that word in that way.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

It's literally the first word that comes to mind when you read her hateful small-minded and petty statement regarding a new fellow member of Congress who has never done a single fucking thing to her to deserve such blatant disrespect

[–] firebyte@lemmy.world 17 points 7 hours ago

Ms. Mace is indeed, a cunt.

And I don't mean the jovial mate-ship meaning of the word in Australian vernacular.

[–] Sparrow_1029@programming.dev 4 points 5 hours ago

I agree completely -- said with the C and the T as very sharp and pronounced as possible.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 16 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Hear me out: she should own this and use the men’s room. And I mean USE it. Get as melodramatic, exaggerated, and make those men uncomfortable as hell. Make yourself known when you enter, be loud, be messy, take up 3/4 of the counter space.

[–] Lumelore@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I heard someone else suggest she should get a porta potty and wheel it around the house of representatives on a pallet jack and be annoying as possible with it. That way she can still piss them off and not have to risk any danger using the men's room.

[–] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

I like this idea better!