this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
229 points (99.1% liked)

News

23267 readers
3028 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Kevin Roberts, president of the Heritage Foundation and architect of Trump’s Project 2025, employs intense fire-related rhetoric in his upcoming book, Dawn’s Early Light: Taking Back Washington to Save America, advocating for a “controlled burn” of institutions he deems corrupt or antithetical to conservative goals.

Roberts calls for dismantling entities like the FBI, Ivy League schools, and the New York Times, framing it as necessary to “renew” America.

His incendiary language has sparked controversy, with critics alarmed by the violent imagery and its implications for Trump’s second term.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] oxjox@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

My personal reaction to reading this is that I want to pick up the book just to better understand what he believes these conservatives values are. Then I realized this is like trying to understand why Hitler wanted to gas the Jews.

What's more important is why the fuck Americans are democratically voting for this. I'm going to venture to guess (and hope) that the majority of people who voted for Trump have no clue what they voted for. I'd like to hope that teachers are going to use this moment in time to perfectly frame it along with the rise of Nazi Germany but I know that Trump also intends on burning down the DoE. Teachers will be prevented from using history to educate students.

Incidentally, I'm already exhausted by all the "news" being made about why the Dems lost and Trump prevailed. We have to be discussing why our media and our existing elected officials are all ignoring the plight of middle class Americans while failing, as they have always done, to educate people.

I remember as a kid hearing presidential debates and getting aggravated that the politicians weren't answering questions. And then in interviews and news reports a topic will be discussed but the contexts and ramifications of that topic are often left out (time constraints, etc). Quick example; why Biden sent arms to Israel has as much, if not more, to do with Iran as it does Gaza. WHY is never explained in political discourse and the media never pressures or holds officials accountable. I am terrified of what Trump will do to our already squeamish journalism community.

I still blame the media for Trump's 2016 win and I'm blaming them again today. People are clueless. Not to say they're unintelligent, they are uneducated regarding politics and history.

People are all in their own bubbles living their day to day lives and occasionally see headlines on their mobile apps. They're subtly influenced, sometimes by the news media but I'd venture to guess equality often by the efforts of Russian, Iranian, and Chinese disinformation armies.

Moreover, this far from a new issue. I was just reading and commented on a story about Musk being the most powerful unelected citizen in America. This reminded me a bit of the guy Citizen Cane was based off of. William Randolph Hearst owned a sprawling media company and used his influence to publish articles that were favorable to Nazis.

How are we not only allowing this but voting in favor of it?

Something is broken. It's not the political parties. It's evidently not the electoral college. Schools have always taught about WWII so it's not our education system. It could be the two party first-past-the post voting system. It could be how election campaigns are financed.

I think we're distracted. I think there's too much going on in modern lives. Too many Americans are struggling to get by while also using every moment of free time to disengage. There's basic government and economic policies and norms that people are clueless about. Take drilling for oil: most Americans think that if we drill for more oil our gas prices will go down. That's not at all true. This will only increase profits for the oil companies because, while the US actually produces more oil than any other country, we lack the infrastructure to refine the oil we have. Honestly, I only learned about that this week. Not to mention the whole tariff thing that republicans are clueless about. Above all else, I'm terrified that Trump's presidency is going to bankrupt Americans.

As this article alludes to, Americans should know that the GOP agenda is to dismantle federal agencies and replace them with private corporations. Some agencies and services will go to the states while others will become Wall Street funded corporations. Theoretically, federal taxes should decrease but state and homeowner taxes are going to sky rocket. The costs of goods and services is going to sky rocket while the quality plummets over time. This has been in the playbook since before Reagan got into office. Now they have the momentum, the votes, and the stooge in the White House to make it happen.

Don't be distracted as the stock market goes to the moon. This is their agenda – to make themselves richer on the backs of clueless Americans.

[–] VantaBrandon@lemmy.world 2 points 24 minutes ago

Great comment, I share many of those concerns.

I guess I'm not so worried that he will bankrupt America per se, but that the US dollar will be diminished in value, and all of the effort, savings and social security that we're all banking on in the future become nearly worthless, while billionaires plunder our country and continue to reap value in spite of the worthlessness.

I'm also concerned Trump is going to die mid-term, and Vance will be running as a better positioned incumbent.

The supreme court, well, that's just a lost cause at this point. I don't see it ever coming back into balance in my lifetime, and perhaps the country goes with it.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 4 points 58 minutes ago (1 children)

Your point about the debate thing is really what gets me. They ask a question and the person on the other end might be close to the answer or they might give some vague response but the moderators are always gutless about it.

“I asked you this question, answer it or we will assume you have no answer and move on.”

[–] pmk@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 27 minutes ago

In an ideal world, dodging questions would lead to decreased popularity. Politicians should feel that if they give bullshit answers, they will not get elected. To get there, we must actually demand, reward, and punish with the power we have, our votes. Of course, one person doing it makes no difference. We need to convince others that this is important.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 42 minutes ago (1 children)

Schools have always taught about WWII so it's not our education system.

It's definitely not not our education system

[–] oxjox@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 minutes ago

You can't really point at today's education system and use it to blame Americans.

People who voted for Trump:
65+: 51%
45-64: 52%
30-44: 47%
18-29: 46%

Our public education system has been abysmal compared to other "first world countries" and we should all be embarrassed.

This has been part of the GOP agenda for decades though. The public schools keep getting worse and subtly foster anti-intellectualism in favor or memorization while the private and higher education schools flourish. The GOP wants to abolish the department of education and replace it with either state run education and/or private corporate owned education.

"Education" is not in the constitution so with a conservative Supreme Court, it's very likely we will see the DoE go away. Bear in mind that the DoE was only just created under Carter and Reagan campaigned on getting rid of it.

And, as teachers start getting wind of this and realizing what the future may hold for them, they're going jump ship. Any hope we have of progressing as a country and competing with other countries is gone. This nation will be run by a handful of corporations paying crap wages to non-union workers without the benefit of social security or pensions.

The writing has been on the wall for a hundred years. We've laughed at it, maybe pondered it, but never took it seriously. All the dystopian novels that have been written are about to come true.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 39 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

We were close to holding right wing extremists accountable. We needed one more term at least. It was clear how suddenly Republicans try to denounce the FBI as a liberal institution after Wray said that white supremacists were the #1 domestic terrorist threat.

Now, we're fucked.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

We were close to holding right wing extremists accountable.

"We" had four goddamn years and did absolutely fuck-all with it! Frankly, in retrospect, the fix was in when Biden appointed Merrick Garland instead of somebody who would actually care about the rule of law and do his goddamn job.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 4 points 42 minutes ago

I know this isn't popular, but because I've literally never seen a substantive counter-argument for this, I have to say that I think Merrick Garland did all that he could given the stacked courts surrounding him. Nobody could've done better. He was clearly building a case from the bottom up that is a classic example of RICO prosecution style, hence the largest criminal investigation in the FBI's history when going after those who committed January 6th. That was always going to lead to Trump. People, however are dreaming and romanticizing this belief that we could've "got" Trump within one year's time and that was never possible.

The only thing that matters is that many Americans knew what Trump was, and a large swath opted to sit out and go, "Both sides!"

We couldn't even convince the proverbial jury that was the American people of crimes in plain sight when they gave a verdict on November 5th.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

This is just a continuation of the wants of the Koch brothers libertarian party agenda from 1979/80.

But, yes, we are fucked.

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2010/08/30/covert-operations

https://lpedia.org/wiki/Document:National_Platform_1980

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 39 minutes ago

I know very little about the Chevron doctrine but I know that the overturning of that made it possible for corporations to essentially ignore any administrative oversight.

I often wondered what would happen if someone were to take the frequencies of the military or even airport flight control and just started broadcasting. Does the FCC have delegated authority? If they don't, sounds like anyone can broadcast Rick Astley on any frequency.

The problem that these justices and elites seem to forget is that they are trusting on the very systems they dismantling working for them.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 40 minutes ago* (last edited 40 minutes ago)

It is not just a continuation of this. Maybe some of the economic things in P2025 come from there, but I don't think the Koch's were ever trying to ban pornography and track women's menstrual cycles.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Too bad critique can do absolutely nothing now. His wishes have already been granted.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

Biden leaves Afghanistan, the Taliban takes over.

Biden leaves the white house, the Taliban takes over.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 73 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

He hates the Boy Scouts and BlackRock? But is also super right-wing? Who is this guy?

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 50 points 4 hours ago (6 children)

The boy scouts one is especially baffling. A lot of boys become more traditionally "manly" through boy scouts. It is physically active and they typically learn skills like camping, fire starting, wood working. We were also expected to do good deeds, be polite, and overall be decent members of society that help where is needed, such as litter clean ups and tree plantings. I guess the latter half of my point is where their issues start?

[–] MightBeAlpharius@lemmy.world 3 points 54 minutes ago

I think the issue started a little over a decade ago, when the Boy Scouts got in some hot water for discriminating against gay kids and they actually tried to be better.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 77 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

Maybe because they now allow girls to participate. Integration is "woke" and must be destroyed.

[–] morriscox@lemmy.world 1 points 31 minutes ago

If they are the Boy Scouts and allow girls to participate then this looks to be the start of a trans joke.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 18 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't know that part. I thought conservatives hate them because they now allow gay leaders after being sued to pieces over it. Also didn't they crack down on pedophiles in the organization? That is the number one pastime of conservative men.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Lol. They didn't get sued to pieces because their leaders were gay, it was because some of them were pedophiles.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 9 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Nobody sued them over gay leaders.

They got sued by parents over not doing anything about pedos, AND got sued by prospective leaders because they were being prevented from joining over their sexual orientation.

Bill wanted to be a scoutmaster since he grew up with scouts, but since he was gay, he was not allowed. He then sued the organization over it. (idk names, that's just for clarity)

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I obviously meant that they were sued for NOT allowing gay leaders and I think even scouts themselves. Google it if you care. Conservatives don't like that they changed the policy on gays.

[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 3 hours ago

I would bet that this is the correct answer.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

Both of them are pretty baffling. Because you're right about the Boy Scouts, but also, BlackRock is basically a Republican dream company.

[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 28 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (4 children)

Because he's attacking all institutions that have some sort of control he wants. The wide net just feeds into the deep state narrative and he needs to capitalize on that right now

Kids, healthcare, education, private equity etc.. that's how you make a dictatorship.

See it this way, BlackRock has enough power to do to the republican party what the republican party is doing to the gov. They need all of that gone to become maglomaniac authoritarians.

If I wanted to become Bill Gates, and make my own Microsoft, i first have to outlaw bill gates and Microsoft.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Did you just accidentally almost coin the term "magalomaniac"?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 38 minutes ago

Coined and minted.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago

I think this is right, but I would add there's a chance this all ends up being for show and BlackRock makes some public show of fealty to the Trumpists that makes them look powerful and gets BlackRock some government contracts down the line. Like, hypocrisy is no barrier for the right wing, they're fully capable of writing a whole novel about (e.g.) how we must destroy Google and then turning around and buying a bunch of shit from them.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

The keys to GAINING power are not the same keys needed to KEEP power.

They gained the power (or will in a few months)

Now they need to keep it.

If one of the keys needed to get it could potentially turn on you, it's better for your regime to eliminate them as soon as possible after taking power.

For a better explanation, CGP GREY has a video about rules for rulers, which clears things up quite well: https://youtu.be/rStL7niR7gs

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

If they already have that much power, it would make more sense to stay on their good side, at least for now, wouldn't it?

[–] RedditWanderer@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Now is the time to scare them at least, and if there's any time to have them on the bad side it's now. See who kneels and who doesn't imo.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

They have the upper hand now, if MAGA is firmly in control of the government, they can dismantle Blackrock in a month.

[–] NeilBru@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 35 minutes ago* (last edited 34 minutes ago) (1 children)

This kind of ignorance is what is most upsetting to me... People just do not seem to be able to grasp the totality of authoritarian rule. I understand why, there is nothing in recent memory even close to this to compare.

But we have really failed our students by not drilling home just how insidious fascism is. Under fascism, corporations become another arm of the government to be used however the singular leader sees fit. Or they get eliminated.

[–] NeilBru@lemmy.world 2 points 26 minutes ago (1 children)

I'm asking, practically speaking, how will the Trumpers dismantle BlackRock inside of 1 month?

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 13 minutes ago* (last edited 10 minutes ago)

Executions? In ~2 months, we will be giving one singular man the power to wield the federal government as a weapon against anyone who doesn't bend the knee (or really for any, or no, reason whatsoever. And this is a very petty man). I don't know if it's going to be in under a month, but we have historical examples to look to. This has happened before.

[–] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I guess the Boy Scouts are "woke" now too since they dared to allow gay scouts and girls rather than fold because they were not making enough revenue.

[–] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

If it's not hateful and white it doesn't represent conservative values, in other words, woke

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Come to think of it, BlackRock occasionally allows people a shade darker than peach rent their properties too.

[–] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

That's radical wokeism

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

I could see the blackrock angle as trying to appease the working class. Like "see we hate big wealth too" but then never actually do anything to hurt blackrock.

[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Not to mention many troops still have an emphasis on Christianity. Though it's slightly less mandatory than it used to be.

[–] sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

So are they going to condemn the church as well?

[–] Mbourgon@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

My mother in law has a book about “Woke Jesus”, and I know some churches have had issues because the parishioners think Jesus was a wuss.

[–] nomous@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

"My Jesus can kick your Jesus' ass!" is the most American thing someone could say

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] goldteeth@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 hours ago

...Let them fight, I guess?

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

You know, at least there's some solace in knowing Trump 100% didn't and can't read Project 2025. He's still going to bull-in-the-china-shop his way though this but I don't think he's going to follow the script exactly.

load more comments
view more: next ›