this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
76 points (95.2% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3884 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

After former President Donald Trump gave his victory speech early Wednesday, at the Palm Beach Convention Center, dozens of his supporters gathered in a lobby to sing “How Great Thou Art,” reciting from memory the words and harmonies of a classic hymn, popular among evangelical Christians.

It was a fitting coda to an election in which Trump once again won the support of about 8 in 10 white evangelical Christian voters, according to AP VoteCast, a sweeping survey of more than 120,000 voters. That margin — among a group that represented about 20% of the total electorate — repeats similarly staggering margins of evangelical support that T rump received in 2020.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Myxomatosis@lemmy.world 35 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I hope religion continues its slow death in America. Forcing your beliefs on people doesn’t help.

[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

I was an agnostic when I was 12-years-old. "Christians" have made me an atheist.

Maybe that's their goal. Playing 5-D checkers there.

[–] vala@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

It's not actually about religion at all anymore.

[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 27 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Can we start putting quotes around the word christians when they so clearly don't give the slightest bit of a fuck about the teachings of christ?

[–] lunarul@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

I grew up in a country with over 90% Christian population in the 80s and 90s. The way the average person in my country would have answered if asked what religions are there would be: Catholic and Orthodox. Any other Christian denomination was clumped under either "sectarians" or "heretics" (and of course non-Christians were just "pagans"). Nobody in my country considered these American churches to count as actual Christians.

And even though I personally grew up as an atheist and spent every single religion class (yeah, that was a mandatory subject in our schools) debating the existence of God with my teachers, I still cringe and resent seeing these people called "Christians".

[–] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 26 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Makes sense to me. If you lack the critical thinking skills to see the contradictions in the fairy tales the Bible serves up, you're likely to miss the fact that the guy paying lip service to 'Christian values' is the antithesis to said values.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

"...but he's white and he sells a bible?" - xtian nationalists

[–] Australis13@fedia.io 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It's really disappointing that so many "Christians" are blind to the fact that Trump fits many of the descriptors for the Antichrist. He may not be the definitive article (he doesn't quite match everything), but is definitely one of those false prophets the Bible specifically warns Christians to look out for. They are ignorant of what the Bible says and the values it actually stands for.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Problem is that almost all people who rise to power fit the description, more or less. What's more disappointing to me ia that evangelicals are willing to completely undermine their own Christian witness by submitting to a leader who is, literally, the exact opposite of what they otherwise preach when they choose a leader, all for a few pieces of political red meat. I can't take anything they say seriously.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

all for ~~a few~~ 30 pieces of ~~political red meat~~ silver

FTFY

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

I can’t take anything they say seriously.

They have never given a good reason to be taken seriously.

[–] Unlocalhost@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

The book of revelation talks about a flock mislead. That gods followers will be mislead by a false prophet.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Are they still going to support him when his prolapsed rectum gets sucked down into the White House plumbing?

[–] vala@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

This is such a thumbnail lol

[–] SPRUNT@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

It's because those motherfuckers desperately want to meet God and believe Trump is their fastpass to heaven.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Yeah, because all these dumbasses are upset that their numbers are dwindling and want to force people to be in their silly little book club, against their will, and against the Constitution.