this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2024
258 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19159 readers
4490 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 40 points 3 days ago

No, he's still liked by some in certain states, generally by the same people who like Liz (although nobody likes her father lol). I could imagine he could even move some older Texans over, assuming they haven't all drank the coolaid. Not much, but if Republicans delivered just one surprise state the resulting tumult would likely shape both parties quite drastically in 2026 onward.

And yes, he's a war criminal so obviously I won't give a shit about the endorsement, but hey, it's not just about the win. It's about making it harder for Trump to contest things later.

[–] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub 45 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Who is this for? No one likes Bush. He is a war criminal who wrecked the economy. Same with Liz’s pop.

[–] hate2bme@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago

Stop spreading misinformation dude. I know a guy that likes bush.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This whole Lincoln project constituency is just political insiders that live in DC, nobody else is changing their vote based on their endorsement. It's so weird that Democrats and the media keep chasing these assholes.

[–] Jardthebard@lemmy.world 36 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think there's an underestimate of how a lot of Republicans don't like trump. They're not a part of his maga crowd but they're still dumb enough to think that voting for a Democrat is worse than voting for trump. The support and endorsement of all of these Republicans and the support of the Lincoln project is showing those people who are Republicans and have Republican beliefs that it is okay to vote for Kamala.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

a switching vote is worth 2

[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

People from his hometown could vote for Harris.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

W is from Connecticut. We’re not waiting on his endorsement.

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

i got the feeling he'd rather stay home and paint dog portraits

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

And I'd support him in that. Bush is hated by both Republicans and Democrats, they've got nothing to gain by courting him. They'll lose more votes than they'd gain.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sure, but I miss the days when I could just disagree with conservatives instead of fear them trying to push fascism.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Bush was a fascist as well. Post 9/11 any dissent was crushed for years, which is how they got to push the Iraq war through.

[–] Birch@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

People tend to forget just how hard the propaganda machine was swinging then. Remember freedom fries? And how the start of the war was timed for primetime television?

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 8 points 2 days ago

"Free speech zones"

[–] Enoril@jlai.lu 5 points 2 days ago

I remember and will never forget the media, politic and the following "french frog white flag bashing" when we told you the reasons invoked for this war were bullshit...

But more important, I will always remember the deadly attacks we got in our country following the global destabilisation you created in the world. They couldn’t access USA so they targeted the Europe instead... Charlie Hebdo, the Bataclan and many more...

I have participated to a retrospective meeting leaded by the colonel in charge of Paris when several sites and the Bataclan were attacked. And how he had to choose where to send the help and how many vehicules he could afford, trying to know if another attack will happens in another site. In this meeting I’ve also heard the phone call of people crying for help and being executed by these fanatics...

Knowing that 6 days before I was in this same fucking place listening Nobuo Uematsu playing final fantasy music... I’m sure you understand why I will never forget that.

I’m lucky this concert was not on the same day of the football/soccer game they initialy targeted but couldn’t due to the enhanced security this day (a minister was there with my company boss and some others colleagues). So they started to travel in the city, shooting at random (like bars) before entering in the concert room and massacre everybody inside...

All of that for the $ of your dear GOP members... The fucking $ you put in all conversations like it’s the ultimate goal of a life. More important than a life... A child life in a school for example...

Please USA, clean your shit, i’m sick seeing the world being impacted by your politics...

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -4 points 3 days ago

Giving Democrats an opportunity to move to the right and gain nothing? No wonder they want his support so badly.

[–] solidgrue@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Welcome to the timeline where Cheney > Bush. Not by much, mind, but the sigil don't lie.

The Daily Beast - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Daily Beast:

Wiki: mixed - There is no consensus on the reliability of The Daily Beast. Most editors consider The Daily Beast a biased or opinionated source. Some editors advise particular caution when using this source for controversial statements of fact related to living persons.


MBFC: Left - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America


Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.thedailybeast.com/liz-cheney-tells-george-w-bush-to-endorse-kamala-harris-its-time/
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support