this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
1256 points (97.4% liked)

Political Memes

5393 readers
3026 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They’ll have a to-do list for sure. Are they going to do it, that’s a whole different question.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 22 hours ago

They’ll have a to-do list for sure.

Send another $25B to Israel for... uh... things. Subsidize the tech sector's enormous investments in AGI, so that those businesses and find new and exciting ways to remove adults from the workforce and replace them with substandard algorithms. Open more public lands up for industrial scale mining, particularly for fossil fuels, which will then be privatized and refined to sell to our energy hungry geopolitical allies in Europe and East Asia. Continue escalating militarily with every member of the BRICS, engaging in a slew of violations of international law (from surveillance to torture to civilian bombings) while beating our chest and declaring we are the champions of liberty and justice. Tax cuts! Domestic spending cuts! Privatization of public services!

Maybe we'll get around to doing something for legalizing abortions specifically in blue states, if we can work it into the schedule.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Nobody’s ever been as mean to anyone as Bad Democrats are to poor trumpie :(

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah I don’t know, like Harris isn’t perfect enough yet for me. She hasn’t danced to my tune yet /“undecided” voter

[–] Luminocta@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (5 children)

As a European,

Wtf.

Like how can you ask for perfection when you have so much BS going on in a country

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 1 points 21 hours ago

As a fellow European I’m equally baffled.

True, the Harris-Walz ticket isn’t amazing on all fronts and atrocious in some. But even their turd sandwich is better than whatever the GQP has cooked up. And there’s a tiny chance at progressivism with the Dems, but none with the Rs.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

glances at the state of European politics

How can you talk shit when Kier Starmer, Emanuel Macron, and Olaf Schultz are your idea of good-enough liberal compromise? And why do these liberal centrists (in the US and Europe both) keep producing larger and larger factions of popular fascist movements?

Liberals have made "perfect" synonymous with "good". Candidates like Corbyn and Melancion were the compromise, but y'all couldn't resist selling your democracies down the river for another decade of dirt cheap imports.

[–] Luminocta@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Not at all. In general the political climate is terrible. I can talk shit because I'm not afraid to do so. You see I do have rights, and that's something Americans are about to lose. That worries me.

And chosing between two evils is a bad position to be in, but they can still chose. What I don't understand is why the American people are so reluctant to choose for freedom under democracy, albeit shabby, over a dictatorship with a senile maniac that hasn't worked a day in his life. He's everything parents warn children about, yet the parents still chose him. Wtf?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

You see I do have rights, and that’s something Americans are about to lose.

I've seen this dogged insistence that Americans have rights but an election can take them away and all I can think of is the Iraq War Protesters, the OWS protesters, the Climate Change protesters, the Pro-Choice activists, LGBT activists, and the anti-Genocide protesters who have all seen police action against them.

You're not about to lose your rights. You're simply going to be subjected to a level of enforcement traditionally reserved for ethnic, religious, social minorities, labor organizers, and other broadly defined "Leftists".

And chosing between two evils is a bad position to be in, but they can still chose.

The choice is an illusion in a system as degraded as the American democracy. Even at the most superficial level, you're telling people they have a choice of who to support when the Electoral College clearly denies them this privilege. If you live in Texas, you'll be counted as a Trump supporter whether you are or not. If you live in California, you're counted to Harris. The swing states are exactly that - all or nothing. Individual voices don't matter.

And that's before you get into the decades of legalized disenfranchisement, vote caging, and voter intimidation that have shaped the results in states like Florida, Ohio, and North Carolina. Florida has the single largest number of disenfranchised voters - 1.1M people, roughly 1 in 14 eligible voters. They are legally disqualified from casting a ballot in the state, overwhelmingly biased against ethnicity. Then you've got places like DC and Puerto Rico, which are fully disenfranchised at the Congressional level and only tangentially represented in the EC, via ex-pat voters and the 23rd amendment.

This isn't lesser of two evils, its a ratchet. Dems backstop progress with legalistic delays and poor leadership. GOPs ram ahead in direct violation of law and precedent, then face no consequences other than a brief sabbatical from high office during wave years. The end result is a consistent march towards fascism.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lugal@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Tbf he has the concept of a plan

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 37 points 2 days ago (13 children)

That's why tankies don't want to support kamala.

It's painfully clear by now that Gaza is just a trump card for them to whine about. It sucks.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

Trump supporters be like: "Um, ackchually, Trump wants to lower taxes, maybe only for the billionaires, but they can invest that into new jobs instead of paying for the state. Even if he outlawed homosexuality or transgenderism, a next president can re-legalize it!" (The last one was a real conversation I had with my mother about the child protection law of Fidesz, which so far seems only protecting the sensibilities of her boyfriend, who often makes such homophobic rants on disgust, you immediately know the real motive wasn't the protection of children, unless you call childishly homophobic men children.)

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If Trump wins, it's not as simple as that. Which means that when he eventually discovers he still doesn't have automatic fascist powers, he would immediately fall back to Project 2025. Which is why it is so foreboding - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_2025#Reactions_and_responses

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

I'm a centrist! I can't tell the difference between these statements!

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Harris needs to douch more than just help US families. She's either going to rebuild the political system from the ground up or next elections after her will be the last. Dictators are knocking on the door and damn near half of the US is desperately trying to get that door open because they've been brainwashed into believing it's the right thing to do

The entire winner takes all needs to go out the window, it will destroy the country. Electoral college, out the window, it's a stupid idea to begin with. Gerrymandering, out. The supreme Court members should have a 4 years max tenure and requires VERY strict rules to avoid corruption

Concepts like fox news should be prohibited, too. Freedom of speech? Sure, but if you claim to be a news organization you either do your dned best to be honest or you get shut down. Fox news and honesty is like fore and water, it doesn't go together.

Just a few ideas to begin with

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago

The results of this election should look like those rigged Central American dictatorship elections. So ashamed that so many of my fellow Americans can't get the mental health help they obviously need.

[–] Isoprenoid@programming.dev 53 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He has concepts of revenge.

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 29 points 2 days ago

Unfortunately, Project 2025 is a whole book/organisation devoted to getting effective permanent revenge.

[–] Meron35@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Sadly a lot of people unironically think that these captions should be reversed, because revenge = violence and that's Chad af and helping others is for wusses, or something

[–] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Also, hundreds of years of prosperity gospel. If you're poor or suffering, then you must have done something wrong because God is punishing you. If you're thriving, then you must be good because God is rewarding you. That's one reason why the police go after poor people more heavily. There more likely to pull over an old beater car than they are a new pickup truck. So if you want to commit crimes just drive a newer truck because they won't even look at you. Even better if you put a thin line sticker somewhere.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not "hundreds of years", don't let them make you think it's old. The idea that "God wants you to be wealthy and healthy and being poor and sick is because you displeased God" only really goes back to the start of the last century, and gained a lot of traction with the Jesus People type revivals in the 70s, when faith healing became a serious mainstream thing in the US. The larger portion of devout US Christians were largely fairly apolitical to left-leaning until about the 50s.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

He has concepts of plans though.

load more comments
view more: next ›