this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
311 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2459 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The woman told a sheriff’s lieutenant in an interview that she filled out her mother’s ballot after her mother’s death, according to a probable cause statement filed with the district court. The statement said the woman was an “ardent” Trump supporter who had wanted to vote for him before she died.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 180 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Of course it was a republican.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 76 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Is someone keeping a tally of how many people went to prison for this guy so far? I can't imagine anyone going to prison for Biden, it's just so crazy.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 49 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 2 weeks ago

There is a tiktok that I'm too lazy to go find but basically it boils down to Trump FANS vs. Biden Voters.

Trump fans are willing to break the law (read: not go to jail) because they believe they are above the law. The law is for punishing other people.

Biden/Harris voters are not fanatics, at least generally speaking.

[–] peto@lemm.ee 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Which just goes to show his lack of presidential authority. - magas (I expect.)

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean, it's actually kind of impressive how Republicans are just willing to do this. People did it for Nixon, Reagan, and to a whole new level with Trump.

[–] peto@lemm.ee 8 points 2 weeks ago

More expected than impressive. They didn't invent warped moral frameworks but they do buy from the market leader. The accusations aren't to convince people to leave the other team, it's to allow people to justify taking those actions themselves. Stochastic vote manipulation of you will.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 37 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's funny, I'm not even expecting the "everything right-wingers complain about is projection" rule to not apply at this point, but it's getting to the point where I'm not sure if they do anything else at all

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Trump is calling Kamala a fascist now which no doubt means he's come up with some new fascist schemes

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 weeks ago

Either it's projection, or it's the "no U R" response.

When they were called weird, the only response was "no U R".

When they claim that Tim Walz is a sexual predator.... that's projection.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

Well, he is talking about the Alien Enemies Act as an immediate action on taking power. There's only really one way to round up what he's saying are millions of people at once, and it's what the Alien Enemies Act was last used for, setting up concentration camps.

I reeeeeeally try to stay hopeful most of his supporters are ignorant of what they're going along with, or we are in serious trouble as a nation no matter who wins.

[–] SassyRamen@lemmy.world 65 points 2 weeks ago

It's always projection

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 44 points 2 weeks ago

The statement said the woman was an “ardent” Trump supporter who had wanted to vote for him before she died.

What's so fucked up about the MAGA news bubble is that they push these false stories of Democratic voter fraud, so their own supporters think that cheating is ok because everyone is doing it. Then these chucklefucks find out the hard way that election fraud - contrary to what Fox News has told them - is taken seriously and has very serious consequences.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So if I read the article correctly: you can cast a vote for a dead person so long as they die after the absentee ballots are mailed out. Plausible deniability.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Just make sure you don't mail it back, the post mark might give you away.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ok I hate to be devils advocate here but… say you are taking care of your sick and dying mother. She has a stack out outgoing mail you haven’t had a chance to drop off at the mailbox yet. It includes her mail in ballot. She dies. Then you take her last unsent mail to the mailbox. It would be post marked after her death. Is that a legit vote?

Also I happened to notice our mail in ballots say “no power of attorney” so presumably the person has to be able to fill out and sign it themselves.

[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 2 points 2 weeks ago

the person has to be able to fill out and sign it themselves.

This. If she voted, but it is postmarked after her death, it will probably be flagged, however, you haven't broken the law.