Gosh, I wonder which side would do such a thing.
this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
212 points (97.3% liked)
politics
19104 readers
2491 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Watch it'll again be those who work forces
Maybe this ages like milk but... The side that expects to win doesn't destroy ballots. It seems very likely to me that this was a Trumper and they all know, in their heart of hearts, Trump has a ceiling of 47pts and will never have broad enough support to win the ec again.
They also know dems are more likely to vote early. I guarantee these vote boxes don't get torched in deeply red counties.
Portland and Vancouver have both had repeated problems with the Proud Boys and Patriot Prayer, so I don't think it will be too hard to figure this one out.
Somebody is bragging on Telegram or somewhere, it will bite them.
We've been using Idaho as Nazi storage since the eighties.
Oh, yeah, but the Proud Boy problem has been coming down from Vancouver, Camas, Battleground...
It's wrong for some random citizen to torch someone's democratic agency. That's what the Electoral College is for.
I'm now aware that there's a Vancouver in the US. I thought it was illegal Canadian votes coming over.
I mean... We here in Vancouver BC just had a Provincial election that is so fiercely fought they are still tallying votes a week after the fact and the winner still has not been officially declared and we have no idea if we have a minority or majority government because some districts (ridings) are like 20 votes apart.
Our election is on fire... Just not literally.
Vancouver Washington is a fun place. I say I live in Washington and a good chunk of people assume DC. I say Vancouver and they think Canada. I usually just tell people I live in Portland and only a small chunk associate that with Maine by default. Also we were first BC... We were first.
Blah blah blah stop the steal blah blah blah imma steal it instead.
The penalty for burning ballots should be burning at the stake.
Idk about that but certainly a realistic punishment in addition to hefty fines and jail time is losing the right to vote for life
Need guards at the boxes or we are gonna need fireproof boxes. We could just have the boxes manned like the scanners are and be sure the ballots are scanned into the database when dropped off so the vote is cast and the paper is just for records.
Let's arm the children so they can patrol the ballot boxes.
/s because you can never be sure when one of the dumbest things you've suggested may become a talking point and then official policy
Fireproof boxes wouldn't help; an incendiary device was placed inside the box.
I seem to recall that at least some boxes in AZ have fire suppression. It's not impossible.
Both of these boxes also had fire suppressants in them. The one in Portland worked, which is why they only lost a few ballots. The one in Vancouver did not work.
I hate Pacific Northwest Nazis.
Guards are a terrible idea. Voter intimidation anyone?
We absolutely have the tech for fireproof boxes though.
They don't have to be standing next to the box. They can be nearby in a car or in a building with camera feed. As long as they are able to pursue someone that tampers with the box.
So, my wife is an elected precinct committee person and last election we were tasked with watching a ballot box to make sure nothing went wrong and nobody was intimidated.
We parked on the other side of the street about a block down and just... watched.
It was fine!
But it was also only on the very last day...
That's neat, but not really what comes to mind when I hear "guards."
Were you two prepared to intervene if someone started lighting the box on fire?
Definitely, I wasn't going to let her do it by herself and I have a concealed carry permit. ;)
That idea would connect voters to the votes they cast. Terrible idea.
That already happens when you vote in person. It's scanned into the machine.
In a highly-controlled and staffed room where no one is allowed recording equipment. This is an external box with no staff. You either need a camera for security (which would connect the counting of the vote with the video's timestamp) or forego one (which allows for illegal ballot stuffing)
Well something needs to be done because allowing arson to destroy votes is not something that should be allowed.
So... Are they going to have a re-vote? Like what's going to happen to all the lost ballets?